public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction	abstraction
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:05:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <485C0D8A.6030500@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620195620.GA20183@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>     
>>> Blows up on "gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)":
>>>       
>> Yeah, I was a bit worried about that. Gcc sometimes does insane 
>> things.
>>
>> We literally just tested that the asm should only _ever_ be generated 
>> with a constant value, but if some gcc dead-code removal thing doesn't 
>> work, it will then screw up and try to generate the asm even for a 
>> non-constant thing.
>>
>> The fairly trivial fix is probably to just change the "i" to "ir", 
>> safe in the knowledge that any _sane_ case will never use the "r" 
>> possibility. I suspect even your insane case will end up then killing 
>> the bad choice later.
>>     
>
> okay - Jeremy, could you try the fix below? (or tip/master, i just 
> pushed this out)
>
>   

Hm.  On 32-bit I get these, but they're warnings.  On 64-bit they're errors.

{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:1609: Warning: using `%dl' instead of `%edx' due to `b' 
suffix

vs

{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:20511: Error: Incorrect register `%eax' used with `b' 
suffix


> (i dont use gcc 3.x myself to build the kernel, had way too many 
> miscompilations in randconfig tests in the past.)
>   

I do it mainly to pick up these kinds of problems.


> 	Ingo
>
> -------------->
> commit b68b80b8ab39c42707dc126c41e87d46edc97c27
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date:   Fri Jun 20 21:50:20 2008 +0200
>
>     x86, bitops: make constant-bit set/clear_bit ops faster, gcc workaround
>     
>     Jeremy Fitzhardinge reported this compiler bug:
>     
>     Suggestion from Linus: add "r" to the input constraint of the
>     set_bit()/clear_bit()'s constant 'nr' branch:
>     
>     Blows up on "gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)":
>     
>      CC      init/main.o
>     include2/asm/bitops.h: In function `start_kernel':
>     include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
>     include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
>     include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
>     include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
>     include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
>     include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
>     
>     Reported-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
> index 6c50548..4575de4 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static inline void set_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
>  	if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
>  		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orb %1,%0"
>  			: CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
> -			: "i" (CONST_MASK(nr))
> +			: "ir" (CONST_MASK(nr))
>  			: "memory");
>  	} else {
>  		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "bts %1,%0"
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static inline void clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
>  	if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
>  		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andb %1,%0"
>  			: CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
> -			: "i" (~CONST_MASK(nr)));
> +			: "ir" (~CONST_MASK(nr)));
>  	} else {
>  		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "btr %1,%0"
>  			: BITOP_ADDR(addr)
>   


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-20 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16 11:29 [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 17:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-16 18:13     ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-16 18:49       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-18 23:23   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-18 23:59     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  0:15       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  0:24         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19  0:37           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  0:49             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19  4:03               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 11:58                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 12:03                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 12:20                   ` Akinobu Mita
2008-06-19 16:30                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 16:47                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 10:10                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 19:06                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-20 19:15                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-20 19:56                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 20:03                               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-20 20:16                                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-20 20:22                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-21  6:06                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 20:05                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-06-19  0:39           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-19  5:03             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  7:20               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-19 17:57                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] paravirt: add hooks for ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 3 of 4] xen: implement ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 4 of 4] xen: add mechanism to extend existing multicalls Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-31  0:04 [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-31  0:04 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 11:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-02 11:57     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=485C0D8A.6030500@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox