From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:05:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485C0D8A.6030500@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620195620.GA20183@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>>> Blows up on "gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)":
>>>
>> Yeah, I was a bit worried about that. Gcc sometimes does insane
>> things.
>>
>> We literally just tested that the asm should only _ever_ be generated
>> with a constant value, but if some gcc dead-code removal thing doesn't
>> work, it will then screw up and try to generate the asm even for a
>> non-constant thing.
>>
>> The fairly trivial fix is probably to just change the "i" to "ir",
>> safe in the knowledge that any _sane_ case will never use the "r"
>> possibility. I suspect even your insane case will end up then killing
>> the bad choice later.
>>
>
> okay - Jeremy, could you try the fix below? (or tip/master, i just
> pushed this out)
>
>
Hm. On 32-bit I get these, but they're warnings. On 64-bit they're errors.
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:1609: Warning: using `%dl' instead of `%edx' due to `b'
suffix
vs
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:20511: Error: Incorrect register `%eax' used with `b'
suffix
> (i dont use gcc 3.x myself to build the kernel, had way too many
> miscompilations in randconfig tests in the past.)
>
I do it mainly to pick up these kinds of problems.
> Ingo
>
> -------------->
> commit b68b80b8ab39c42707dc126c41e87d46edc97c27
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date: Fri Jun 20 21:50:20 2008 +0200
>
> x86, bitops: make constant-bit set/clear_bit ops faster, gcc workaround
>
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge reported this compiler bug:
>
> Suggestion from Linus: add "r" to the input constraint of the
> set_bit()/clear_bit()'s constant 'nr' branch:
>
> Blows up on "gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)":
>
> CC init/main.o
> include2/asm/bitops.h: In function `start_kernel':
> include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
> include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
> include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
> include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
> include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
> include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
>
> Reported-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
> index 6c50548..4575de4 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static inline void set_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
> if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
> asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orb %1,%0"
> : CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
> - : "i" (CONST_MASK(nr))
> + : "ir" (CONST_MASK(nr))
> : "memory");
> } else {
> asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "bts %1,%0"
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static inline void clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
> if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
> asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andb %1,%0"
> : CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
> - : "i" (~CONST_MASK(nr)));
> + : "ir" (~CONST_MASK(nr)));
> } else {
> asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "btr %1,%0"
> : BITOP_ADDR(addr)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-20 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-16 11:29 [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-16 18:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-16 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-18 23:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-18 23:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19 0:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19 0:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 0:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19 0:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 4:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 11:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 12:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 12:20 ` Akinobu Mita
2008-06-19 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 16:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 10:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 19:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-20 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-20 19:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-20 20:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-20 20:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-21 6:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 20:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-06-19 0:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-19 5:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19 7:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-19 17:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] paravirt: add hooks for ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 3 of 4] xen: implement ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 4 of 4] xen: add mechanism to extend existing multicalls Jeremy Fitzhardinge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-31 0:04 [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-31 0:04 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-02 11:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485C0D8A.6030500@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox