From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: Bisecting tip/auto-x86-next?
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:00:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485C4484.3080706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620153626.GE17373@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> hm, could you send me the config that triggered this?
>> I will do so tonight when I am home again. It is a UP AMD64 box with
>> a VIA chipset, if that helps.
>>
>>> btw., you can probably ignore this one safely. Also please tell me
>>> at which commit ID you were at when you triggered this warning.
>> Good to know - I will get the commit ID tonight as well, although
>> wouldn't following the same bisection sequence that I did give you the
>> same bisection point? I guess that would assume that linus/master and
>> auto-x86-next haven't changed much since last night, which might not
>> be correct.
>
> yeah, you'd probably not hit that warning with the x86/gart bisection
> sequence. (Assuming the bug is introduced in that branch - so you should
> first check whether pure x86/gart kernel triggers the problem too.)
>
> If you still have the commit ID around then please send it - if you
> dont, no problem, it's no big issue. I wanted to check how wide the
> bisection window is where the warning triggers.
>
I'm sorry - I accidentally checkout out x86/gart to test it before
grabbing the commit ID.
I went ahead with the bisection and found:
8c9fd91a0dc503f085169d44f4360be025f75224 is first bad commit
commit 8c9fd91a0dc503f085169d44f4360be025f75224
Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Apr 13 18:42:31 2008 -0700
x86: checking aperture size order
some systems are using 32M for gart and agp when memory is less
than 4G.
Kernel will reject and try to allcate another 64M that is not needed,
and we will waste 64M of perfectly good RAM.
this patch adds a workaround by checking aper_base/order between NB and
agp bridge. If they are the same, and memory size is less than 4G, it
will allow it.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
:040000 040000 848d6e4045a14d01fc0a794d4350d8a84f3ceff6
4a10a52b41309060cd5dc1bf0c322f6d43b2477b M arch
:040000 040000 aa1cee87b1f5b1b30ed03ce6164ad7f404fef2a3
f9ce0aaa1f7d4fdc7bdc5a43285495db53a6f531 M drivers
as the first bad commit. I do not have time to look at the patch right
now, but in case anyone else does, I figured I would post it.
Thanks,
--
Kevin Winchester
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-20 0:40 Bisecting tip/auto-x86-next? Kevin Winchester
2008-06-20 7:15 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-06-20 10:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 22:23 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-06-20 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 10:49 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-20 11:40 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-06-20 10:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-20 11:37 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-06-20 15:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-21 0:00 ` Kevin Winchester [this message]
2008-06-21 0:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-21 10:00 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-06-21 10:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-21 10:23 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-06-21 10:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-21 10:39 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-06-21 10:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-21 11:49 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-06-23 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485C4484.3080706@gmail.com \
--to=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox