From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: v2.6.26-rc7: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:58:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485FD644.80208@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806231326.11328.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Monday 23 June 2008 02:29:07 Vegard Nossum wrote:
>> And the (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) fails because the CPU has just been
>> offlined (or failed to initialize, but it's the same thing), while
>> NR_CPUS is the value that was compiled in as CONFIG_NR_CPUS (so the
>> former check will always be true).
>>
>> I don't think it is valid to ask for a per_cpu() variable on a CPU
>> which does not exist, though
>
> Yes it is. As long as cpu_possible(cpu), per_cpu(cpu) is valid.
>
> The number check should be removed: checking cpu_possible() is sufficient.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Rusty.
I don't see a check for index being out of range in cpu_possible().
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-23 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-22 12:56 v2.6.26-rc7: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference Vegard Nossum
2008-06-22 14:47 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-22 14:54 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-22 15:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-22 16:29 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-23 3:26 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-23 16:58 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-06-24 1:36 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-24 7:40 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-24 8:06 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-06-24 8:37 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-24 13:14 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-24 14:44 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-25 5:38 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 15:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-26 12:58 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-06-27 3:16 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-30 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-26 0:59 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-06-26 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-26 9:00 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-26 12:40 ` Jason Wessel
2008-06-26 13:59 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-10 19:10 ` Vegard Nossum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485FD644.80208@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox