From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: <mingo@elte.hu>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Gregory Haskins" <GHaskins@novell.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, "David Bahi" <DBahi@novell.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:51:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48601AFE.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080623225645.31515.36393.stgit@lsg.lsg.lab.novell.com>
>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:04 PM, in message
<20080623225645.31515.36393.stgit@lsg.lsg.lab.novell.com>, Gregory Haskins
<ghaskins@novell.com> wrote:
>
>
> I think the patch 1/3 is a good one, but it requires careful review. Patch
> 2/3 is based upon some work I had seen PeterZ submit, so its possible to
> just pull his work (if it hasnt been already) as opposed to this patch, if
> desired. Lastly, Patch 3/3 is a bit controversial so I put it last for
> easier cherry picking of the first two. It does help in our testing, but
> it
> will have to be reviewed carefully.
Err...in case it wasnt obvious, I had 2/3 and 3/3 inverted in my description. 2/3 is the controversial one, 3/3 is based on Peter's work. Sorry for the(my) confusion. :)
-Greg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-23 23:04 [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements Gregory Haskins
2008-06-23 23:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock during newidle balancing Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 0:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-24 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock duringnewidle balancing Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lockduringnewidle balancing Gregory Haskins
2008-06-23 23:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: only run newidle if previous task was CFS Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-23 23:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 0:50 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 1:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-24 1:26 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 2:39 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 1:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 2:59 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at leastone " Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once atleastone " Gregory Haskins
2008-06-24 19:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 0:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements Steven Rostedt
2008-06-24 1:51 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48601AFE.BA47.005A.0@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=DBahi@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox