From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758284AbYFXQu4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:50:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751615AbYFXQut (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:50:49 -0400 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:26015 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072AbYFXQus (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:50:48 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5324"; a="4183947" Message-ID: <486125E5.7020209@qualcomm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:50:45 -0700 From: Max Krasnyanskiy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: "Daniel K." , mingo@elte.hu, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Jackson , Gregory Haskins Subject: Re: RT-Scheduler/cgroups: Possible overuse of resources assigned via cpu.rt_period_us and cpu.rt_runtime_us References: <485917CF.1010401@uw.no> <1213799836.16944.244.camel@twins> <486090DC.7010705@qualcomm.com> <1214301185.4351.8.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1214301185.4351.8.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 23:14 -0700, Max Krasnyansky wrote: > >> That seems too complicated :). There is no need to mount them separately. > > Mounting them independently gives you much greater flexibility. > > You quickly run into overlapping cpu sets if you want multiple groups on > the isolated part. Sure, it is more flexible but for simple cases it's more confusing. Max