From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI: MSI interrupts masked using prohibited method
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:17:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4864DA54.6000205@csr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806251420.51751.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --]
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:46 am David Vrabel wrote:
>> PCI MSI interrupts are masked and unmasked using a method (by writing
>> the MSI Enable capability bit) that is prohibited by the PCI specification.
>
> Yeah, it's probably quite a bit slower too (I assume you're talking about
> io_apic_64's msi_mask_irq). Seems like masking this at the ioapic level
> would make more sense anyway...
>
>> This behaviour can cause missed interrupts with some devices if the
>> interrupt is asserted by the hardware while MSI is disabled.
>>
>> I believe the interrupt should be masked/unmasked on the interrupt
>> controller (the APIC on x86, for example). I'm going to test this now
>> and see if it works.
After further research it seems that MSI interrupts aren't routed via
the IO-APIC, so this cannot be done.
I think the only solution is to not perform any sort of masking and rely
on the device driver being able to handle this.
David
--
David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers
CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562
Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ http://www.csr.com/
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: pci-dont-mask-msi-with-msi-enable-bit.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff; name="pci-dont-mask-msi-with-msi-enable-bit.patch", Size: 1922 bytes --]
PCI: don't mask MSI's with MSI Enable bit
The PCI Local Bus Specification Revision 3.0, section 6.8.1.3. Message
Control for MSI on page 236, prohibited the use of the MSI Enable bit for
masking and unmasking the interrupt.
"MSI Enable: If 1 and the MSI-X Enable bit in the MSI-X Message
Control register (see Section 6.8.2.3) is 0, the
function is permitted to use MSI to request service
and is prohibited from using its INTx# pin (if
implemented; see Section 6.2.4 Interrupt pin register).
System configuration software sets this bit to enable
MSI. A device driver is prohibited from writing this bit
to mask a function’s service request."
There is no alternative method for mask/unmask on PCI devices with MSI
and no specific mask bit. In this case, the device driver will have
to ensure (via some hardware specific mechanism) that MSI's are only
generated when the device driver can handle them.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6-working/drivers/pci/msi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-working.orig/drivers/pci/msi.c 2008-06-27 12:24:17.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-working/drivers/pci/msi.c 2008-06-27 12:25:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -141,7 +141,18 @@
mask_bits |= flag & mask;
pci_write_config_dword(entry->dev, pos, mask_bits);
} else {
- msi_set_enable(entry->dev, !flag);
+ /*
+ * If there is no mask bit, this irq cannot be
+ * masked and the driver will have to use
+ * whatever hardware specific mechanisms are
+ * available to control the sending of MSI
+ * messages.
+ *
+ * Note: cannot attempt to mask via the MSI
+ * enable bit as that is prohibited by the PCI
+ * specification.
+ */
+ return;
}
break;
case PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-27 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 10:46 PCI: MSI interrupts masked using prohibited method David Vrabel
2008-06-25 21:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-06-27 12:17 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2008-06-27 17:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-16 19:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-16 19:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-16 20:35 ` David Miller
2008-07-17 12:16 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-17 12:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-17 13:14 ` David Vrabel
2008-07-17 15:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-17 15:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-17 16:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-17 17:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-17 16:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <487F7DFA.10101@csr.com>
2008-07-17 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-18 10:33 ` David Vrabel
2008-07-22 13:56 ` Michal Schmidt
2008-07-22 17:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-23 13:02 ` Michal Schmidt
2008-07-25 13:29 ` Michal Schmidt
2008-07-25 13:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-25 13:53 ` Michal Schmidt
2008-07-25 15:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-28 9:54 ` Michal Schmidt
2008-07-25 16:37 ` David Vrabel
2008-07-25 16:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-25 19:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-28 9:59 ` Michal Schmidt
2008-07-28 22:04 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4864DA54.6000205@csr.com \
--to=david.vrabel@csr.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox