* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] thermal: trip: Rework thermal_zone_set_trip() and its callers
2023-11-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] thermal: trip: Rework thermal_zone_set_trip() and its callers Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2023-11-29 16:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2023-11-29 17:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-11-29 21:43 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-11-30 10:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2023-11-29 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM
Cc: LKML, Srinivas Pandruvada, Zhang Rui, Lukasz Luba
Hi Rafael,
On 29/11/2023 14:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Both trip_point_temp_store() and trip_point_hyst_store() use
> thermal_zone_set_trip() to update a given trip point, but none of them
> actually needs to change more than one field in struct thermal_trip
> representing it. However, each of them effectively calls
> __thermal_zone_get_trip() twice in a row for the same trip index value,
> once directly and once via thermal_zone_set_trip(), which is not
> particularly efficient, and the way in which thermal_zone_set_trip()
> carries out the update is not particularly straightforward.
>
> Moreover, some checks done by them both need not go under the thermal
> zone lock and code duplication between them can be reduced quite a bit
> by moving the majority of logic into thermal_zone_set_trip().
>
> Rework all of the above functions to address the above.
Please hold on before merging this change. I've some comment about it
but I have to double check a couple of things before
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3: Fix missing return statement in thermal_zone_set_trip() (Lukasz).
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Fix 2 typos in the changelog (Lukasz).
> * Split one change into the [1/2].
>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h | 9 ++++++
> drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c | 52 ++++++++--------------------------
> drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> include/linux/thermal.h | 3 --
> 4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> @@ -122,6 +122,15 @@ void __thermal_zone_device_update(struct
> void __thermal_zone_set_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
> int __thermal_zone_get_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> struct thermal_trip *trip);
> +
> +enum thermal_set_trip_target {
> + THERMAL_TRIP_SET_TEMP,
> + THERMAL_TRIP_SET_HYST,
> +};
> +
> +int thermal_zone_set_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> + enum thermal_set_trip_target what, const char *buf);
> +
> int thermal_zone_trip_id(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> const struct thermal_trip *trip);
> int __thermal_zone_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp);
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> @@ -120,31 +120,17 @@ trip_point_temp_store(struct device *dev
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = to_thermal_zone(dev);
> - struct thermal_trip trip;
> - int trip_id, ret;
> + int trip_id;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!device_is_registered(dev))
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> if (sscanf(attr->attr.name, "trip_point_%d_temp", &trip_id) != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
> -
> - if (!device_is_registered(dev)) {
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> -
> - ret = __thermal_zone_get_trip(tz, trip_id, &trip);
> - if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> -
> - ret = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &trip.temperature);
> - if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> + ret = thermal_zone_set_trip(tz, trip_id, THERMAL_TRIP_SET_TEMP, buf);
>
> - ret = thermal_zone_set_trip(tz, trip_id, &trip);
> -unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> -
> return ret ? ret : count;
> }
>
> @@ -179,30 +165,16 @@ trip_point_hyst_store(struct device *dev
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = to_thermal_zone(dev);
> - struct thermal_trip trip;
> - int trip_id, ret;
> + int trip_id;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!device_is_registered(dev))
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> if (sscanf(attr->attr.name, "trip_point_%d_hyst", &trip_id) != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
> -
> - if (!device_is_registered(dev)) {
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> -
> - ret = __thermal_zone_get_trip(tz, trip_id, &trip);
> - if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> -
> - ret = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &trip.hysteresis);
> - if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> -
> - ret = thermal_zone_set_trip(tz, trip_id, &trip);
> -unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> + ret = thermal_zone_set_trip(tz, trip_id, THERMAL_TRIP_SET_HYST, buf);
>
> return ret ? ret : count;
> }
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c
> @@ -148,39 +148,61 @@ int thermal_zone_get_trip(struct thermal
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_get_trip);
>
> int thermal_zone_set_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> - const struct thermal_trip *trip)
> + enum thermal_set_trip_target what, const char *buf)
> {
> - struct thermal_trip t;
> - int ret;
> + struct thermal_trip *trip;
> + int val, ret = 0;
>
> - ret = __thermal_zone_get_trip(tz, trip_id, &t);
> + if (trip_id < 0 || trip_id >= tz->num_trips)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &val);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (t.type != trip->type)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
>
> - if (t.temperature != trip->temperature && tz->ops->set_trip_temp) {
> - ret = tz->ops->set_trip_temp(tz, trip_id, trip->temperature);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> + trip = &tz->trips[trip_id];
>
> - if (t.hysteresis != trip->hysteresis && tz->ops->set_trip_hyst) {
> - ret = tz->ops->set_trip_hyst(tz, trip_id, trip->hysteresis);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + switch (what) {
> + case THERMAL_TRIP_SET_TEMP:
> + if (val == trip->temperature)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + if (tz->ops->set_trip_temp) {
> + ret = tz->ops->set_trip_temp(tz, trip_id, val);
> + if (ret)
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + trip->temperature = val;
> + break;
> +
> + case THERMAL_TRIP_SET_HYST:
> + if (val == trip->hysteresis)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + if (tz->ops->set_trip_hyst) {
> + ret = tz->ops->set_trip_hyst(tz, trip_id, val);
> + if (ret)
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + trip->hysteresis = val;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> - if (tz->trips && (t.temperature != trip->temperature || t.hysteresis != trip->hysteresis))
> - tz->trips[trip_id] = *trip;
> -
> thermal_notify_tz_trip_change(tz->id, trip_id, trip->type,
> trip->temperature, trip->hysteresis);
>
> __thermal_zone_device_update(tz, THERMAL_TRIP_CHANGED);
>
> - return 0;
> +unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int thermal_zone_trip_id(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/thermal.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -283,9 +283,6 @@ int __thermal_zone_get_trip(struct therm
> int thermal_zone_get_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> struct thermal_trip *trip);
>
> -int thermal_zone_set_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> - const struct thermal_trip *trip);
> -
> int for_each_thermal_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> int (*cb)(struct thermal_trip *, void *),
> void *data);
>
>
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] thermal: trip: Rework thermal_zone_set_trip() and its callers
2023-11-29 16:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2023-11-29 17:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2023-11-29 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM, LKML, Srinivas Pandruvada, Zhang Rui,
Lukasz Luba
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:54 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 29/11/2023 14:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Both trip_point_temp_store() and trip_point_hyst_store() use
> > thermal_zone_set_trip() to update a given trip point, but none of them
> > actually needs to change more than one field in struct thermal_trip
> > representing it. However, each of them effectively calls
> > __thermal_zone_get_trip() twice in a row for the same trip index value,
> > once directly and once via thermal_zone_set_trip(), which is not
> > particularly efficient, and the way in which thermal_zone_set_trip()
> > carries out the update is not particularly straightforward.
> >
> > Moreover, some checks done by them both need not go under the thermal
> > zone lock and code duplication between them can be reduced quite a bit
> > by moving the majority of logic into thermal_zone_set_trip().
> >
> > Rework all of the above functions to address the above.
>
> Please hold on before merging this change. I've some comment about it
> but I have to double check a couple of things before
That's fine, but why don't you make the comment before the double checks?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] thermal: trip: Rework thermal_zone_set_trip() and its callers
2023-11-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] thermal: trip: Rework thermal_zone_set_trip() and its callers Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-11-29 16:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2023-11-29 21:43 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-11-30 10:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lukasz Luba @ 2023-11-29 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: LKML, Daniel Lezcano, Srinivas Pandruvada, Zhang Rui, Linux PM
On 11/29/23 13:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Both trip_point_temp_store() and trip_point_hyst_store() use
> thermal_zone_set_trip() to update a given trip point, but none of them
> actually needs to change more than one field in struct thermal_trip
> representing it. However, each of them effectively calls
> __thermal_zone_get_trip() twice in a row for the same trip index value,
> once directly and once via thermal_zone_set_trip(), which is not
> particularly efficient, and the way in which thermal_zone_set_trip()
> carries out the update is not particularly straightforward.
>
> Moreover, some checks done by them both need not go under the thermal
> zone lock and code duplication between them can be reduced quite a bit
> by moving the majority of logic into thermal_zone_set_trip().
>
> Rework all of the above functions to address the above.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3: Fix missing return statement in thermal_zone_set_trip() (Lukasz).
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Fix 2 typos in the changelog (Lukasz).
> * Split one change into the [1/2].
>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h | 9 ++++++
> drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c | 52 ++++++++--------------------------
> drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> include/linux/thermal.h | 3 --
> 4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
That looks OK. I have also checked those places
were we set the callbacks. In mainline we only use
set_trip_temp() callback. I don't know what is
Daniel's idea for the patch, but LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
also tested both patches on two arm32, arm64 boards
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] thermal: trip: Rework thermal_zone_set_trip() and its callers
2023-11-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] thermal: trip: Rework thermal_zone_set_trip() and its callers Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-11-29 16:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2023-11-29 21:43 ` Lukasz Luba
@ 2023-11-30 10:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2023-11-30 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2023-11-30 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM
Cc: LKML, Srinivas Pandruvada, Zhang Rui, Lukasz Luba
Hi Rafael,
On 29/11/2023 14:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Both trip_point_temp_store() and trip_point_hyst_store() use
> thermal_zone_set_trip() to update a given trip point, but none of them
> actually needs to change more than one field in struct thermal_trip
> representing it. However, each of them effectively calls
> __thermal_zone_get_trip() twice in a row for the same trip index value,
> once directly and once via thermal_zone_set_trip(), which is not
> particularly efficient, and the way in which thermal_zone_set_trip()
> carries out the update is not particularly straightforward.
>
> Moreover, some checks done by them both need not go under the thermal
> zone lock and code duplication between them can be reduced quite a bit
> by moving the majority of logic into thermal_zone_set_trip().
>
> Rework all of the above functions to address the above.
The resulting change looks to me over complicate for the code it is
supposed to improve. One new function, one enum and leaking the sysfs
buffer to a function located outside of thermal-sysfs.c. That does not
improve the readability IMO.
The function thermal_zone_set_trip is only called from thermal_syfs.c
Why not directly change the trip point temp/hyst value in the array in
the thermal_sysfs functions and remove the function
thermal_zone_set_trip() ?
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3: Fix missing return statement in thermal_zone_set_trip() (Lukasz).
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Fix 2 typos in the changelog (Lukasz).
> * Split one change into the [1/2].
>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h | 9 ++++++
> drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c | 52 ++++++++--------------------------
> drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> include/linux/thermal.h | 3 --
> 4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> @@ -122,6 +122,15 @@ void __thermal_zone_device_update(struct
> void __thermal_zone_set_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
> int __thermal_zone_get_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> struct thermal_trip *trip);
> +
> +enum thermal_set_trip_target {
> + THERMAL_TRIP_SET_TEMP,
> + THERMAL_TRIP_SET_HYST,
> +};
> +
> +int thermal_zone_set_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> + enum thermal_set_trip_target what, const char *buf);
> +
> int thermal_zone_trip_id(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> const struct thermal_trip *trip);
> int __thermal_zone_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp);
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c
> @@ -120,31 +120,17 @@ trip_point_temp_store(struct device *dev
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = to_thermal_zone(dev);
> - struct thermal_trip trip;
> - int trip_id, ret;
> + int trip_id;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!device_is_registered(dev))
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> if (sscanf(attr->attr.name, "trip_point_%d_temp", &trip_id) != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
> -
> - if (!device_is_registered(dev)) {
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> -
> - ret = __thermal_zone_get_trip(tz, trip_id, &trip);
> - if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> -
> - ret = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &trip.temperature);
> - if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> + ret = thermal_zone_set_trip(tz, trip_id, THERMAL_TRIP_SET_TEMP, buf);
>
> - ret = thermal_zone_set_trip(tz, trip_id, &trip);
> -unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> -
> return ret ? ret : count;
> }
>
> @@ -179,30 +165,16 @@ trip_point_hyst_store(struct device *dev
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = to_thermal_zone(dev);
> - struct thermal_trip trip;
> - int trip_id, ret;
> + int trip_id;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!device_is_registered(dev))
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> if (sscanf(attr->attr.name, "trip_point_%d_hyst", &trip_id) != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
> -
> - if (!device_is_registered(dev)) {
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> -
> - ret = __thermal_zone_get_trip(tz, trip_id, &trip);
> - if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> -
> - ret = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &trip.hysteresis);
> - if (ret)
> - goto unlock;
> -
> - ret = thermal_zone_set_trip(tz, trip_id, &trip);
> -unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> + ret = thermal_zone_set_trip(tz, trip_id, THERMAL_TRIP_SET_HYST, buf);
>
> return ret ? ret : count;
> }
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_trip.c
> @@ -148,39 +148,61 @@ int thermal_zone_get_trip(struct thermal
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_get_trip);
>
> int thermal_zone_set_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> - const struct thermal_trip *trip)
> + enum thermal_set_trip_target what, const char *buf)
> {
> - struct thermal_trip t;
> - int ret;
> + struct thermal_trip *trip;
> + int val, ret = 0;
>
> - ret = __thermal_zone_get_trip(tz, trip_id, &t);
> + if (trip_id < 0 || trip_id >= tz->num_trips)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &val);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (t.type != trip->type)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
>
> - if (t.temperature != trip->temperature && tz->ops->set_trip_temp) {
> - ret = tz->ops->set_trip_temp(tz, trip_id, trip->temperature);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> + trip = &tz->trips[trip_id];
>
> - if (t.hysteresis != trip->hysteresis && tz->ops->set_trip_hyst) {
> - ret = tz->ops->set_trip_hyst(tz, trip_id, trip->hysteresis);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + switch (what) {
> + case THERMAL_TRIP_SET_TEMP:
> + if (val == trip->temperature)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + if (tz->ops->set_trip_temp) {
> + ret = tz->ops->set_trip_temp(tz, trip_id, val);
> + if (ret)
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + trip->temperature = val;
> + break;
> +
> + case THERMAL_TRIP_SET_HYST:
> + if (val == trip->hysteresis)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + if (tz->ops->set_trip_hyst) {
> + ret = tz->ops->set_trip_hyst(tz, trip_id, val);
> + if (ret)
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + trip->hysteresis = val;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> - if (tz->trips && (t.temperature != trip->temperature || t.hysteresis != trip->hysteresis))
> - tz->trips[trip_id] = *trip;
> -
> thermal_notify_tz_trip_change(tz->id, trip_id, trip->type,
> trip->temperature, trip->hysteresis);
>
> __thermal_zone_device_update(tz, THERMAL_TRIP_CHANGED);
>
> - return 0;
> +unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int thermal_zone_trip_id(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/thermal.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -283,9 +283,6 @@ int __thermal_zone_get_trip(struct therm
> int thermal_zone_get_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> struct thermal_trip *trip);
>
> -int thermal_zone_set_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip_id,
> - const struct thermal_trip *trip);
> -
> int for_each_thermal_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> int (*cb)(struct thermal_trip *, void *),
> void *data);
>
>
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] thermal: trip: Rework thermal_zone_set_trip() and its callers
2023-11-30 10:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2023-11-30 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2023-11-30 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM, LKML, Srinivas Pandruvada, Zhang Rui,
Lukasz Luba
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 11:40 AM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
>
> On 29/11/2023 14:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Both trip_point_temp_store() and trip_point_hyst_store() use
> > thermal_zone_set_trip() to update a given trip point, but none of them
> > actually needs to change more than one field in struct thermal_trip
> > representing it. However, each of them effectively calls
> > __thermal_zone_get_trip() twice in a row for the same trip index value,
> > once directly and once via thermal_zone_set_trip(), which is not
> > particularly efficient, and the way in which thermal_zone_set_trip()
> > carries out the update is not particularly straightforward.
> >
> > Moreover, some checks done by them both need not go under the thermal
> > zone lock and code duplication between them can be reduced quite a bit
> > by moving the majority of logic into thermal_zone_set_trip().
> >
> > Rework all of the above functions to address the above.
>
> The resulting change looks to me over complicate for the code it is
> supposed to improve. One new function, one enum and leaking the sysfs
> buffer to a function located outside of thermal-sysfs.c. That does not
> improve the readability IMO.
>
> The function thermal_zone_set_trip is only called from thermal_syfs.c
>
> Why not directly change the trip point temp/hyst value in the array in
> the thermal_sysfs functions and remove the function
> thermal_zone_set_trip() ?
I can do that if you prefer it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread