public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression: boot failure on AMD Elan TS-5500
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:22:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <486A921E.2070306@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080701195942.GA76608@atlantis.8hz.com>

Sean Young wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:42:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>   
>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>     
>>> Maybe it really does require the far jump immediately after setting PE 
>>> in cr0...
>>>
>>> Hm, I don't remember this paragraph being in vol 3a, section 8.9.1 
>>> before.  Is it a recent addition?
>>>
>>>   Random failures can occur if other instructions exist between steps
>>>   3 and 4 above.  Failures will be readily seen in some situations,
>>>   such as when instructions that reference memory are inserted between
>>>   steps 3 and 4 while in system management mode.
>>>
>>>       
>> I don't remember that, either.
>>     
>
> Which document are we talking about? 
>   

*The* document ;)
http://www.intel.com/products/processor/manuals/ specifically, Volume 
3a: System Programming Guide, Part 1. 

Section 8.9.1 describes the steps needed to turn on protected mode 
correctly.  It says that you need to do a far jump or call immediately 
after turning on protected mode.  Linux has not done it immediately, and 
there has been a school of thought that this advice is a workaround for 
some obsolete CPU, and is not something we have to worry about now.

However, the paragraph I quoted was added since the previous release of 
the manual, and so presumably documents a current concern.  
Specifically, the mention of SMM is interesting, because I gather that 
embedded-class processors like the Elan are very SMM-dependent.

>> Sean: could you try the following patch?
>>
>> 	-hpa
>>     
>
>   
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S b/arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S
>> index ab049d4..141b6e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S
>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ protected_mode_jump:
>>  	movw	%cs, %bx
>>  	shll	$4, %ebx
>>  	addl	%ebx, 2f
>> +	jmp	1f			# Short jump to serialize on 386/486
>> +1:
>>  
>>  	movw	$__BOOT_DS, %cx
>>  	movw	$__BOOT_TSS, %di
>> @@ -40,8 +42,6 @@ protected_mode_jump:
>>  	movl	%cr0, %edx
>>  	orb	$X86_CR0_PE, %dl	# Protected mode
>>  	movl	%edx, %cr0
>> -	jmp	1f			# Short jump to serialize on 386/486
>> -1:
>>  
>>  	# Transition to 32-bit mode
>>  	.byte	0x66, 0xea		# ljmpl opcode
>>     
>
> I'm afraid it doesn't work. Maybe I can find something in the AMD Elan
> documentation. Would a fence make sense?
>   

Not really, but if it fixes the bug it won't hurt anyone else (unless 
older processors treat it as an illegal instruction).

    J

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-01 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16 12:11 Regression: boot failure on AMD Elan TS-5500 Sean Young
2008-06-16 13:27 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-16 13:37   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 16:19     ` Sean Young
2008-06-16 17:06       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 17:58         ` Sean Young
2008-06-16 18:16           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 17:06       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 17:07       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-30 21:43       ` Sean Young
2008-06-30 21:52         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-30 22:04           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-30 22:14             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-30 22:36               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-30 22:45                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-30 22:31             ` Sean Young
2008-06-30 22:34             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-30 22:42               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-01 19:59                 ` Sean Young
2008-07-01 20:20                   ` Sean Young
2008-07-01 20:24                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-01 20:25                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-15 22:23                     ` Sean Young
2008-07-15 22:30                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-01 20:22                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-07-01 20:23                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-01 20:29                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-01 20:39                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-06 13:21                       ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-30 22:09           ` Sean Young
2008-07-06  2:41             ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-06  3:07               ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=486A921E.2070306@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sean@mess.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox