From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758793AbYGDBt7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 21:49:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758219AbYGDBtp (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 21:49:45 -0400 Received: from E23SMTP02.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.163]:35478 "EHLO e23smtp02.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758174AbYGDBto (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 21:49:44 -0400 Message-ID: <486D81B9.9030704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:19:45 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.26-rc8-mm1] memrlimit: fix mmap_sem deadlock References: <20080703160117.b3781463.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080703160117.b3781463.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > There doesn't seem to have been much discussion regarding your recent > objections to the memrlimit patches. But it caused me to put a big > black mark on them. Perhaps sending it all again would be helpful. Black marks are not good, but there have been some silly issues found with them. I have been addressing/answering concerns raised so far. Would you like me to fold all patches and fixes and send them out for review again? -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL