From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754813AbYGGOez (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:34:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753531AbYGGOer (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:34:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:51630 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753237AbYGGOeq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:34:46 -0400 Message-ID: <48722996.4050601@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:35:02 -0400 From: Tony Camuso Reply-To: tcamuso@redhat.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesse Barnes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org CC: "Schoeller, Patrick (Linux - Houston, TX)" Subject: bfsort whitelist patch apparently applied twice Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In the most recent pull from Linus' tree, I see that the patch I submitted on 14-May-2008 was merged twice in the git log. commits: a16b4bcd31a73a81b6d2b8ffa6b5f6ed01cf6d64 and: a1676072558854b95336c8f7db76b0504e909a0a The result is that now the DL360 and DL380 are whitelisted twice and the DL385 G2 and DL585 G2 are not whitelisted at all! Can one of these redundant commits be backed out? Thanks and regards, Tony