From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: scan: Fix device check notification handling
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:35:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4872492.GXAFRqVoOG@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6021126.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It is generally invalid to fail a Device Check notification if the scan
handler has not been attached to the given device after a bus rescan,
because there may be valid reasons for the scan handler to refuse
attaching to the device (for example, the device is not ready).
For this reason, modify acpi_scan_device_check() to return 0 in that
case without printing a warning.
While at it, reduce the log level of the "already enumerated" message
in the same function, because it is only interesting when debugging
notification handling
Fixes: 443fc8202272 ("ACPI / hotplug: Rework generic code to handle suprise removals")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
v1 -> v2: Add R-by from Jonathan.
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -314,18 +314,14 @@ static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct
* again).
*/
if (adev->handler) {
- dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Already enumerated\n");
- return -EALREADY;
+ dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "Already enumerated\n");
+ return 0;
}
error = acpi_bus_scan(adev->handle);
if (error) {
dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Namespace scan failure\n");
return error;
}
- if (!adev->handler) {
- dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Enumeration failure\n");
- error = -ENODEV;
- }
} else {
error = acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 16:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: scan: Check enabled _STA bit on Bus/Device Checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2024-02-26 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI: scan: Relocate acpi_bus_trim_one() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_processor_add() check the device enabled bit Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 9:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-27 11:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI: scan: Rework Device Check and Bus Check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 9:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-26 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: scan: Consolidate " Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 9:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4872492.GXAFRqVoOG@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox