From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@linux-foundation.org>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Thomas Friebel <thomas.friebel@amd.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, paravirt-spinlocks: fix boot hang
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:55:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4874DF7F.4080204@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080709134944.GA15190@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>
>> the patches caused a boot hang with this config:
>>
>> http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Jul__9_14_47_04_CEST_2008.bad
>>
>
> ok, fixed it via the patch below.
>
> Ingo
>
> -------------->
> commit 6412367fe22dc54cc727e7bec5bd65c36c1a0754
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date: Wed Jul 9 15:42:09 2008 +0200
>
> x86, paravirt-spinlocks: fix boot hang
>
> the paravirt-spinlock patches caused a boot hang with this config:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Jul__9_14_47_04_CEST_2008.bad
>
> i have bisected it down to:
>
> | commit e17b58c2e85bc2ad2afc07fb8d898017c2b75ed1
> | Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
> | Date: Mon Jul 7 12:07:53 2008 -0700
> |
> | xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks
>
> i.e. applying that patch alone causes the hang. The hang happens in the
> ftrace self-test:
>
> initcall utsname_sysctl_init+0x0/0x19 returned 0 after 0 msecs
> calling init_sched_switch_trace+0x0/0x4c
> Testing tracer sched_switch: PASSED
> initcall init_sched_switch_trace+0x0/0x4c returned 0 after 167 msecs
> calling init_function_trace+0x0/0x12
> Testing tracer ftrace:
> [hard hang]
>
> it should have continued like this:
>
> Testing tracer ftrace: PASSED
> initcall init_function_trace+0x0/0x12 returned 0 after 198 msecs
> calling init_irqsoff_tracer+0x0/0x14
> Testing tracer irqsoff: PASSED
> initcall init_irqsoff_tracer+0x0/0x14 returned 0 after 3 msecs
> calling init_mmio_trace+0x0/0x12
> initcall init_mmio_trace+0x0/0x12 returned 0 after 0 msecs
>
> the problem is that such lowlevel primitives as spinlocks should never
> be built with -pg (which ftrace does). Marking paravirt.o as non-pg and
> marking all spinlock ops as always-inline solve the hang.
>
Thanks Ingo, that would have taken me a while to work out.
Presumably that means that xen/smp.o should also be built without -pg.
In fact, should I move the spinlock code into its own file, so that
ftrace can cover as much as it can?
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-07 19:07 [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] x86/paravirt: add hooks for spinlock operations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] paravirt: introduce a "lock-byte" spinlock implementation Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] xen: use lock-byte " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08 6:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-08 7:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08 7:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-08 0:29 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks Rusty Russell
2008-07-08 0:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08 1:01 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-08 4:51 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-08 5:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:35 ` [patch] x86: paravirt spinlocks, !CONFIG_SMP build fixes (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks) Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:39 ` [patch] x86: paravirt spinlocks, modular build fix " Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 13:33 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 13:49 ` [patch] x86, paravirt-spinlocks: fix boot hang (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks) Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 15:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-07-09 19:26 ` [patch] x86, paravirt-spinlocks: fix boot hang Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4874DF7F.4080204@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=clameter@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=thomas.friebel@amd.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox