From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:14:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4876194E.4080205@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487556A5.5090907@goop.org>
With the zero based approach you do not have a relative address anymore. We are basically creating a new absolute address space where we place variables starting at zero.
This means that we are fully independent from the placement of the percpu segment.
The loader may place the per cpu segment with the initialized variables anywhere. We just need to set GS correctly for the boot cpu. We always need to refer to the per cpu variables
via GS or by adding the per cpu offset to the __per_cpu_offset[] (which is now badly named because it points directly to the start of the percpu segment for each processor).
So there is no 2G limitation on the distance between the code and the percpu segment anymore. The 2G limitation still exists for the *size* of the per cpu segment. If we go beyond 2G in defined per cpu variables then the per cpu addresses will wrap.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-10 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 190+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-09 16:51 [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 01/15] x86_64: Cleanup early setup_percpu references Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 02/15] x86_64: Fold pda into per cpu area Mike Travis
2008-07-09 22:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-13 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-14 14:24 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 03/15] x86_64: Reference zero-based percpu variables offset from gs Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 04/15] x86_64: Replace cpu_pda ops with percpu ops Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 05/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations with x86_xxx_percpu() Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 06/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations in include_asm-x86_current_h Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 07/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations in include_asm-x86_hardirq_64_h Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 08/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations in include_asm-x86_mmu_context_64_h Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 09/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations in include_asm-x86_percpu_h Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 10/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations in include_asm-x86_smp_h Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 11/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations in include_asm-x86_stackprotector_h Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 12/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations in include_asm-x86_thread_info_h Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 13/15] x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations in include_asm-x86_topology_h Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 14/15] x86_64: Remove xxx_pda() operations Mike Travis
2008-07-09 16:51 ` [RFC 15/15] x86_64: Remove cpu_pda() macro Mike Travis
2008-07-09 17:19 ` [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 17:40 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 17:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 18:05 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 17:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 18:09 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 18:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 19:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 19:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 20:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-09 21:03 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 21:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-25 15:49 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-25 16:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-25 16:46 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-25 16:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-25 18:12 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 17:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 17:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 17:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 18:14 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 18:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 18:31 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 19:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 18:02 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 18:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 18:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 18:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 18:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 18:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 18:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 19:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 19:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 19:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 19:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 19:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 20:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 20:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 21:05 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 19:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 19:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 18:27 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 18:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 20:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-09 20:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 20:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-09 21:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 21:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 21:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-09 23:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-09 18:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 18:00 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 19:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 19:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 20:55 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 21:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 20:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-09 20:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 20:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 20:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 20:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 20:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 20:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 20:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 20:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 21:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-09 21:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 21:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 21:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-09 21:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 21:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 22:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-09 22:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 23:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 0:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 0:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 14:14 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-07-10 14:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 15:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 15:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 16:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 16:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 17:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 17:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 17:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 17:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 20:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 20:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 21:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-11 0:55 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-10 21:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 21:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 21:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-11 0:12 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-11 0:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-11 0:58 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-11 1:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-11 15:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-11 0:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-11 15:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 17:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 17:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 19:11 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-10 19:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 17:46 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-10 17:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 19:18 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-10 19:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 23:37 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-10 20:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 20:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-10 21:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-11 1:39 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-11 2:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 0:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 20:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 20:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-09 20:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 20:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 21:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 21:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 21:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 22:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-09 22:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 23:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 16:22 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-10 16:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 16:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 16:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 16:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 17:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 17:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 17:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 18:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 17:20 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-10 17:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 17:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 17:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 17:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 17:41 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-10 18:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 20:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 21:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-10 21:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-11 15:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-11 16:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-11 16:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-11 17:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 21:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 18:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 18:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 19:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 19:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-10 20:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 20:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-11 6:59 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-10 20:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-10 17:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-10 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-09 20:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 20:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-09 20:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-09 21:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 21:39 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-09 21:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-09 21:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4876194E.4080205@linux-foundation.org \
--to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox