public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Peterson <joe@skyrush.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Elias Oltmanns" <eo@nebensachen.de>,
	"Török Edwin" <edwintorok@gmail.com>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:44:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4877FE5C.3000900@skyrush.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080711154748.407ea6c9@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

Alan Cox wrote:
>> seems that the following two calls do the same thing in n_tty.c:
>> 		n_tty_flush_buffer(tty);
>> 		tty_driver_flush_buffer(tty);
> 
> Sorry missed this originally - they don't do the same thing. The first
> clears out anything in the ldisc internally the second clears out
> anything in the tty driver itself.

Alan, before I wrote this, I had put a printk() in n_tty_flush_buffer()
and noticed it was called twice when ^C was hit in an xterm.  Then I did
some investigating into this a few days ago, putting a dump_stack() in
n_tty_flush_buffer() so I could see how it is being called.

I realized the calls indeed have different purposes at that point.  I
still wonder, though, why when processing a ^C in an xterm/pty,
n_tty_flush_buffer() does get called again from the driver call.  See
the two traces below from the ldisc and driver flushes:

***********  CTRL-C received
Pid: 4669, comm: xterm Not tainted 2.6.26-rc8-git3 #1
 [<c0283126>] n_tty_flush_buffer+0xd/0x67
 [<c028385c>] n_tty_receive_buf+0x398/0xd87
 [<c031824b>] ? sock_aio_read+0xed/0xfb
 [<c017a824>] ? do_sync_read+0xab/0xe9
 [<c0136257>] ? hrtimer_forward+0xd6/0xec
 [<c0285569>] pty_write+0x2d/0x3b
 [<c0283450>] write_chan+0x21b/0x28f
 [<c011bfa4>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xd
 [<c028103f>] tty_write+0x14e/0x1be
 [<c0283235>] ? write_chan+0x0/0x28f
 [<c017a8ec>] ? rw_verify_area+0x8a/0xad
 [<c0280ef1>] ? tty_write+0x0/0x1be
 [<c017ae88>] vfs_write+0x8c/0x133
 [<c017b48c>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
 [<c0103aa3>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xb1
 =======================
Pid: 4669, comm: xterm Not tainted 2.6.26-rc8-git3 #1
 [<c02857c5>] ? pty_unthrottle+0x15/0x21
 [<c0283126>] n_tty_flush_buffer+0xd/0x67
 [<c0285663>] pty_flush_buffer+0x20/0x67
 [<c038ae61>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1b/0x2f
 [<c0284934>] tty_driver_flush_buffer+0x13/0x15
 [<c0283863>] n_tty_receive_buf+0x39f/0xd87
 [<c031824b>] ? sock_aio_read+0xed/0xfb
 [<c017a824>] ? do_sync_read+0xab/0xe9
 [<c0136257>] ? hrtimer_forward+0xd6/0xec
 [<c0285569>] pty_write+0x2d/0x3b
 [<c0283450>] write_chan+0x21b/0x28f
 [<c011bfa4>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xd
 [<c028103f>] tty_write+0x14e/0x1be
 [<c0283235>] ? write_chan+0x0/0x28f
 [<c017a8ec>] ? rw_verify_area+0x8a/0xad
 [<c0280ef1>] ? tty_write+0x0/0x1be
 [<c017ae88>] vfs_write+0x8c/0x133
 [<c017b48c>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
 [<c0103aa3>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xb1
 =======================

In a Linux virtual console/tty, however, the tty driver flush doesn't
call the ldisc flush again in my tests:

***********  CTRL-C received
Pid: 6, comm: events/0 Not tainted 2.6.26-rc8-git3 #1
 [<c0283126>] n_tty_flush_buffer+0xd/0x67
 [<c028385c>] n_tty_receive_buf+0x398/0xd87
 [<c038ab32>] ? _spin_lock_irqsave+0x27/0x41
 [<c038ab32>] ? _spin_lock_irqsave+0x27/0x41
 [<c038ae61>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1b/0x2f
 [<c027f3ee>] ? tty_ldisc_try+0x2f/0x35
 [<c027f9e2>] flush_to_ldisc+0xde/0x14d
 [<c013129d>] run_workqueue+0x78/0x102
 [<c027f904>] ? flush_to_ldisc+0x0/0x14d
 [<c0131a0b>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0xbf
 [<c0131abf>] worker_thread+0xb4/0xbf
 [<c0133f4d>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x33
 [<c0133e77>] kthread+0x3b/0x64
 [<c0133e3c>] ? kthread+0x0/0x64
 [<c0104753>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
 =======================


						-Joe

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-12  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-28 10:38 Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O Török Edwin
2008-06-29  2:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-29  2:45   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-29  3:42   ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-29  5:13     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-29  5:39       ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-29  6:25         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-29  7:45           ` Török Edwin
2008-06-29 23:57           ` Bill Davidsen
2008-06-29 12:37         ` Alan Cox
2008-06-30 17:35       ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-06-29  7:09   ` Török Edwin
2008-06-29  7:23   ` David Newall
2008-06-29 12:10   ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-29 16:02     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-30 10:30       ` Helge Hafting
2008-07-01  7:47 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-01  8:02   ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-01  8:28     ` Török Edwin
2008-07-01  9:59       ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-01 12:07       ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-01  8:50   ` David Newall
2008-07-01  9:01     ` Török Edwin
2008-07-01  9:12       ` David Newall
2008-07-01 14:12   ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-01 14:48     ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-01 16:27       ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-02 21:26   ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-04 20:10   ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-04 20:23     ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 21:17       ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-11 14:47         ` Alan Cox
2008-07-12  0:44           ` Joe Peterson [this message]
2008-07-12 10:37             ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 21:21       ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-04 21:14         ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 21:36           ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-04 21:44             ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 22:09               ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-05 10:34                 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-05 11:00                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-05 11:34                     ` Alan Cox
2008-07-05 12:49                     ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-05 14:01                       ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-05 19:58                       ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-06  8:28                         ` Elias Oltmanns
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-03  0:59 Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4877FE5C.3000900@skyrush.com \
    --to=joe@skyrush.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=edwintorok@gmail.com \
    --cc=eo@nebensachen.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox