public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Török Edwin" <edwintorok@gmail.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix delayed signals
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:33:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48788891.5070905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080711155306.3153e0a1@infradead.org>

On 2008-07-12 01:53, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>     
>>> Btw, did any of the impacted people test -rc9? Edwin's report is
>>> about -rc2 and -rc8, and one of the things we fixed since -rc8 is
>>> that incorrect and unintentional nr_zones zeroing that effectively
>>> disabled kswapd - and made everybody do synchronous memory freeing
>>> when they wanted to allocate more memory.. That can play havoc with
>>> any interactive stuff.
>>>       
>> Hmm. Edwin's latencytop output includes this (ignoring the _very_ top 
>> entries that are all either CD-ROM media change tests or are
>> interruptible pipe/select things) at the top:
>>
>> 	21 10264428 915514 get_request_wait __make_request
>> generic_make_request submit_bio xfs_submit_ioend_bio xfs_submit_ioend 
>> 		xfs_page_state_convert xfs_vm_writepage __writepage 
>> 		write_cache_pages generic_writepages xfs_vm_writepages
>>     
>
>
> argh. well I guess this might be useful for this case, but normally
> latencytop gives you much more humanly readable data... maybe Edwin
> forgot to do "make install" :-(

I forgot to use 'latencytop -d', I was running latencytop and when I've
seen something interesting I did a 'cat /proc/latency_stats' instead of
'latencytop -d'.
I'll try to use latencytop -d next time.

Best regards,
--Edwin

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-12 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-10 21:50 [PATCH] x86_64: fix delayed signals Roland McGrath
2008-07-10 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-10 22:42   ` Roland McGrath
2008-07-10 22:51     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-10 23:02       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11  0:52       ` Roland McGrath
2008-07-11  1:18         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11  1:27           ` Roland McGrath
2008-07-11  1:48         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11  2:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11  2:22             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11  2:26               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 12:24             ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-11  5:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-11 11:13   ` Török Edwin
2008-07-11 12:24   ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-11 17:58   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 18:07     ` Roland McGrath
2008-07-11 18:16       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 18:17         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 18:10     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 18:31       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 22:53         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-12 10:33           ` Török Edwin [this message]
2008-07-11 20:37       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 23:22         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 10:32           ` Török Edwin
2008-07-12 13:42             ` Török Edwin
2008-07-12 14:55               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-12 18:00                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 18:15                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-12 18:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 17:29             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 20:26               ` Török Edwin
2008-07-12 20:47                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 20:57                 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-07-13 10:46                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-07-13 12:34                     ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-07-13 18:36                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 18:45                       ` Peter T. Breuer
2008-07-12 12:27     ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-12 17:41       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13  9:38         ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-13 17:32           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 18:59             ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-13 19:08               ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48788891.5070905@gmail.com \
    --to=edwintorok@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=eo@nebensachen.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox