From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:26:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <487D15FC.1060300@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080715210002.GA7072@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
>
> in hindsight core/percpu indeed looks unfinished and direction-less
> without core/percpu-zerobased - but the latter is not stable yet.
>
> Ingo
Well it's very stable using gcc-4.2.4. The earlier problems came about
using gcc-4.2.0 and has yet to be determined what exactly went wrong.
(And I need to install gcc-3.2 to complete the build/test QA.)
Btw, is there a list of "bad" gcc's for kernel building? Or better yet,
can the Makefile script provide a warning when a known "bad" gcc is
being used to compile the kernel? I seem to recall that Peter provided
this list:
4.2.3 is fine; he was using 4.2.0 before, and as far as I know,
4.2.0 and 4.2.1 are known broken for the kernel.
Thanks!
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-15 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-14 14:34 [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27 Ingo Molnar
2008-07-14 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 15:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-15 21:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15 21:26 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-07-15 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-18 22:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 22:54 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-25 15:18 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=487D15FC.1060300@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox