public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:45:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <487EEA9B.4030808@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807161728560.2835@woody.linux-foundation.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>> Andi did not. The whole series I pulled was rebased today at 2PM.
>> Ugg, when Andi took over we talked about it; I thought we had agreed that he 
>> would stick with Len's tree.  I guess I was wrong.
> 
> Well, I haven't actually seen Len's original tree, so maybe the stuff Andi 
> pushed was just the stuff he had queued up independently. I guess I 
> shouldn't judge before I'm sure.

I originally started with topic branches and imported a few patches
this way, but then eventually realized they don't really match my
working style. In particular I tend to edit and sometimes
delete old patches and that seems to be quite painful with
the topic branch setup (or perhaps I just haven't figured out
how to do it nicely). Also tried it with guilt, but that
also ran into some issues (in particular after merges one
cannot manage the patches as a guilt stack anymore)

What I did then was to export Len's tree to quilt, do all the touchups
etc, merged some more patches and then regenerated a quilt tree for
the merge request. That is how the old x86-64 tree used to work.

-Andi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-17  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-16 21:45 Please pull ACPI updates Andi Kleen
2008-07-16 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-16 23:33   ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-16 23:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-16 23:51       ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-17  0:32         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17  0:53           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17  2:26             ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-17  2:56               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17  6:45           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-07-17 15:06             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17  6:40       ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 15:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 18:49           ` Len Brown
2008-07-17 19:12             ` Harvey Harrison
2008-07-17 19:50               ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 19:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 19:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 21:15             ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-17 23:11           ` [PATCH] Revert duplicate "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled" commit (was: Please pull ACPI updates) Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-17 23:25             ` [PATCH] Revert duplicate "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled" commit Andi Kleen
2008-07-18  0:07             ` [PATCH] Revert duplicate "ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled" commit (was: Please pull ACPI updates) Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-17  6:47     ` Please pull ACPI updates Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 15:18       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 15:47         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 16:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 16:23           ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 19:11             ` Ray Lee
2008-07-17 19:49               ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 20:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 20:14                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 20:16                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 20:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-18 13:25                       ` Olivier Galibert
2008-07-18 15:57                         ` Ray Lee
2008-07-17 20:34                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 20:11                 ` Ray Lee
2008-07-17 20:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18  6:39                     ` david
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-24 20:36 Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=487EEA9B.4030808@firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox