From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <mingo@elte.hu>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: readjust the load whenever task_setprio()is invoked
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:01:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48805C06.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216384984.28405.36.camel@twins>
>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:43 AM, in message <1216384984.28405.36.camel@twins>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 15:37 -0600, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> The load may change with the priority, so be sure to recompute its value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
>> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> Right, but in this case we'd need to do the dec/inc load game again
> because otherwise we'll skew stuff - see the previuos mail on how
> dequeue_task() doesn't actually do that.
>
> Also, it looks like current mainline still has this issue.
>
> OTOH - since prio boosting is a temporal feature, not changing the load
> isn't too bad, we ought to get back to where we came from pretty
> quickly.
Yeah, I agree. This issue probably didn't actually matter much in practice.
It just "looked" wrong, so I figured I'd fix it ;)
-Greg
>
>
>
>> ---
>>
>> kernel/sched.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
>> index b046754..c3f41b9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
>> @@ -4637,6 +4637,7 @@ void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
>> p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
>>
>> p->prio = prio;
>> + set_load_weight(p);
>>
>> // trace_special_pid(p->pid, __PRIO(oldprio), PRIO(p));
>> prev_resched = _need_resched();
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 21:37 [PATCH 0/2] sched: misc fixes for stable-25.y and 25-rt Gregory Haskins
2008-07-03 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: remove extraneous load manipulations Gregory Haskins
2008-07-18 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 12:53 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-21 22:06 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-03 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: readjust the load whenever task_setprio() is invoked Gregory Haskins
2008-07-18 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 13:01 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48805C06.BA47.005A.0@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox