public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
To: Craig Milo Rogers <rogers@ISI.EDU>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	gorcunov@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:52:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4881AB31.7010400@keyaccess.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080719080002.GA11272@isi.edu>

On 19-07-08 10:00, Craig Milo Rogers wrote:

> In <487D7781.6000407@keyaccess.nl>, Rene Herman proposed [somewhat 
> arbitrary] transition to 2.8 and 2.9, and specified that 3.0 should
> be until when world domination by Linux is near.

Nonono, that's all backwards! This is about having a 3.0 release BRING 
ABOUT world domination!

</tongue in cheek> and all but that was my point -- with a not at least 
ostensibly feature driven scheme you loose out on all the hype, press, 
marketing and, frankly, on the fun.

Really, find me a single Linux developer who wouldn't try just a little 
bit harder for a big 3.0 release. This is still a community, not yet a 
boring office schedule...

Rene.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-19  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-15  2:10 From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? Stoyan Gaydarov
2008-07-15  2:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15  2:31   ` Stoyan Gaydarov
2008-07-15  2:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15  3:55       ` david
2008-07-15  5:31         ` Willy Tarreau
2008-07-15  6:40           ` Rafael C. de Almeida
2008-07-15  7:23           ` Stoyan Gaydarov
2008-07-15  7:49       ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-17 17:25         ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-17 19:56           ` Craig Milo Rogers
2008-07-17 20:21             ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19  8:00               ` Craig Milo Rogers
2008-07-19  8:52                 ` Rene Herman [this message]
2008-07-19 20:49                   ` Craig Milo Rogers
2008-07-19 20:56                     ` david
2008-07-19 21:56                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-20  8:34                     ` Rene Herman
2008-07-20 14:53                       ` Stefanos Harhalakis
2008-07-19 19:30                 ` Peter T. Breuer
2008-07-19 21:16                   ` Craig Milo Rogers
2008-07-19 23:10                     ` Peter T. Breuer
2008-07-15  8:29       ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2008-07-15 12:41       ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-07-15 13:18         ` Alberto Gonzalez
2008-07-15 18:06       ` Charles grey wolf Banas
2008-07-15 20:43       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-16  7:53         ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-16  7:57           ` Rene Herman
2008-07-17 22:16         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-15 10:10   ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-15 11:31     ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-15 15:20     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 15:27     ` Parag Warudkar
2008-07-15 15:32       ` Alan Cox
2008-07-18  9:02         ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-16 21:11     ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-07-15 12:38   ` Alan Cox
2008-07-15 14:07   ` Byron Stanoszek
2008-07-16 21:14     ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-07-17  0:03       ` Alex Chiang
2008-07-17 12:38         ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-07-17 20:02           ` Alex Chiang
2008-07-15 14:24   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-07-15 16:36     ` Tobias Brox
2008-07-15 18:04   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-16  4:22     ` Rene Herman
2008-07-16  6:55       ` Rafael C. de Almeida
2008-07-16  7:17         ` Rene Herman
2008-07-16  7:30         ` Rene Herman
2008-07-16  9:34       ` Peter T. Breuer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-17 22:05 Alastair Stevens
2008-07-17 22:40 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-07-18  8:23   ` Peter T. Breuer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4881AB31.7010400@keyaccess.nl \
    --to=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rogers@ISI.EDU \
    --cc=stoyboyker@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox