From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix pte_flags() to only return flags, fix lguest.
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:49:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488566EA.5040805@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807221431.58991.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell wrote:
> Change a15af1c9ea2750a9ff01e51615c45950bad8221b 'x86/paravirt: add
> pte_flags to just get pte flags' removed lguest's private pte_flags()
> in favor of a generic one.
>
> Unfortunately, the generic one doesn't filter out the non-flags bits:
> this results in lguest creating corrupt shadow page tables and blowing
> up host memory.
>
> Since noone is supposed to use the pfn part of pte_flags(), it seems
> safest to always do the filtering.
>
Thinking about this, I wonder if it needs to be a pv_op at all.
Generality says "yes", but there are no users which set it to anything
other than native_pte_flags. The point of it is to return the flags
as-is, without needing more complex stuff (like Xen's mfn to pfn
conversion).
In most cases, the surrounding code will be applying its own mask
anyway, so making it a simple inline will allow all the masks to get
folded together.
If a user which wants to do something other than return the bare flags,
it would be easy enough to put the pv_op back.
> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> diff -r ee1a6adad3d2 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c Mon Jul 21 12:49:25 2008 +1000
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c Tue Jul 22 14:09:33 2008 +1000
> @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ struct pv_mmu_ops pv_mmu_ops = {
> #endif /* PAGETABLE_LEVELS >= 3 */
>
> .pte_val = native_pte_val,
> - .pte_flags = native_pte_val,
> + .pte_flags = native_pte_flags,
> .pgd_val = native_pgd_val,
>
> .make_pte = native_make_pte,
> diff -r ee1a6adad3d2 include/asm-x86/page.h
> --- a/include/asm-x86/page.h Mon Jul 21 12:49:25 2008 +1000
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/page.h Tue Jul 22 14:09:33 2008 +1000
> @@ -144,6 +144,18 @@ static inline pteval_t native_pte_val(pt
> return pte.pte;
> }
>
> +/* This belongs in pgtable.h, but our includes are too much of a mess. */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_X86_PAE)
> +#define PTE_FLAGS _AC(0x8000000000000FFF, ULL)
> +#else
> +#define PTE_FLAGS 0x00000FFF
> +#endif
>
We already have this, it's called PTE_MASK.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-22 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-22 4:31 [PATCH] x86: fix pte_flags() to only return flags, fix lguest Rusty Russell
2008-07-22 4:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-22 4:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-22 4:52 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-22 4:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-07-22 5:40 ` [PATCH] x86: fix pte_flags() to only return flags, fix lguest (updated) Rusty Russell
2008-07-22 5:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: rename PTE_MASK to PTE_PFN_MASK Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-22 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-22 10:58 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-22 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-22 13:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-22 14:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-22 15:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-22 15:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-22 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-22 15:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-22 5:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: add PTE_FLAGS_MASK Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-22 9:04 ` [PATCH] x86: fix pte_flags() to only return flags, fix lguest (updated) Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 0:59 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-24 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-25 1:55 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-28 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488566EA.5040805@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox