public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	mingo@elte.hu, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, pj@sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu hotplug,	sched:Introduce	cpu_active_map	and	redoscheddomainmanagment (take 2)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:06:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4885E952.8020708@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48856BA9.6050609@qualcomm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3653 bytes --]

Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> Greg, correct me if I'm wrong but we seem to have exact same issue with the
> rq->rq->online map. Lets take "cpu going down" for example. We're clearing
> rq->rd->online bit on DYING event, but nothing AFAICS prevents another cpu
> calling rebuild_sched_domains()->partition_sched_domains() in the middle of
> the hotplug sequence.
> partition_sched_domains() will happily reset rd->rq->online mask and things
> will fail. I'm talking about this path
>
> __build_sched_domains() -> cpu_attach_domain() -> rq_attach_root()
> 	...
> 	cpu_set(rq->cpu, rd->span);
> 	if (cpu_isset(rq->cpu, cpu_online_map))
> 		set_rq_online(rq);
> 	...
>
>   

I think you are right, but wouldn't s/online/active above fix that as 
well?  The active_map didnt exist at the time that code went in initially ;)

> --
>
> btw Why didn't we convert sched*.c to use rq->rd->online when it was
> introduced ? ie Instead of using cpu_online_map directly.
>   
I think things were converted where they made sense to convert.  But we 
also had a different goal at that time, so perhaps something was 
missed.  If you think something else should be converted, please point 
it out.

In the meantime, I would suggest we consider this patch on top of yours 
(applies to tip/sched/devel):

----------------------

sched: Fully integrate cpus_active_map and root-domain code
   
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 62b1b8e..99ba70d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -6611,7 +6611,7 @@ static void rq_attach_root(struct rq *rq, struct 
root_domain *rd)
     rq->rd = rd;
 
     cpu_set(rq->cpu, rd->span);
-    if (cpu_isset(rq->cpu, cpu_online_map))
+    if (cpu_isset(rq->cpu, cpu_active_map))
         set_rq_online(rq);
 
     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 7f70026..2bae8de 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
  * search starts with cpus closest then further out as needed,
  * so we always favor a closer, idle cpu.
  * Domains may include CPUs that are not usable for migration,
- * hence we need to mask them out (cpu_active_map)
+ * hence we need to mask them out (rq->rd->online)
  *
  * Returns the CPU we should wake onto.
  */
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
             || ((sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR)
             && !task_hot(p, task_rq(p)->clock, sd))) {
             cpus_and(tmp, sd->span, p->cpus_allowed);
-            cpus_and(tmp, tmp, cpu_active_map);
+            cpus_and(tmp, tmp, task_rq(p)->rd->online);
             for_each_cpu_mask(i, tmp) {
                 if (idle_cpu(i)) {
                     if (i != task_cpu(p)) {
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 24621ce..d93169d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -936,13 +936,6 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
         return -1; /* No targets found */
 
     /*
-     * Only consider CPUs that are usable for migration.
-     * I guess we might want to change cpupri_find() to ignore those
-     * in the first place.
-     */
-    cpus_and(*lowest_mask, *lowest_mask, cpu_active_map);
-
-    /*
      * At this point we have built a mask of cpus representing the
      * lowest priority tasks in the system.  Now we want to elect
      * the best one based on our affinity and topology.

--------------

Regards,
-Greg


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-22 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-15 11:43 [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redo sched domain managment (take 2) Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15 11:49 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-07-15 11:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 11:57     ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-07-15 12:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 15:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15 12:45 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-15 15:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-16  8:57 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-16 20:29   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-16 21:55     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-16 12:12 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-16 21:44   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-17  2:51     ` [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redosched " Gregory Haskins
2008-07-17  7:16       ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-17 11:57         ` [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redoscheddomain " Gregory Haskins
2008-07-17 18:52           ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-17 19:46             ` [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redoscheddomainmanagment " Gregory Haskins
2008-07-18 11:53               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 12:22                 ` [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched:Introduce " Gregory Haskins
2008-07-22  5:10                   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-22 14:06                     ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2008-07-22 14:16                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-22 14:17                         ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-22 14:26                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-22 14:45                             ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-22 19:32                       ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-11 13:11                       ` Gregory Haskins
2008-08-11 21:57                         ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-18 11:30 ` [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redo sched domain managment " Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4885E952.8020708@novell.com \
    --to=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox