public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Korneliusz Osmenda <korneliuszo@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Guard pci_create_sysfs_dev_files with atomic value
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 12:58:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888964.44csPzL39Z@steina-w> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <612dfdd2-7de1-12a7-c47c-7569c3466224@suse.com>

Hi Oliver,

Am Donnerstag, 16. März 2023, 12:17:32 CET schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> On 16.03.23 10:33, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > Hi Oliver,
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Admittedly
> > I would like to get rid of these two pathes for creating sysfs files in
> > the
> > first place, but I do not know the pci subsystem very well.
> > IMHO for_each_pci_dev(pdev) in pci_sysfs_init is part of the problem as it
> > unconditionally iterates over the bus, without any locks, thus creating
> > sysfs files for each device added to the bus.
> > Any ideas?
> 
> First of all, this existing code is a mess.
> 
> If I understand you have the issue that your driver adds a bridge
> in dw_pcie_host_init() and the generic code in pci_create_sysfs_dev_files()
> populates the directory before or while your driver does so and
> the devices are effectively discovered twice.

Yep, that's my observation as well.

> It seems to me that you must not add a bridge before
> pci_create_sysfs_dev_files() has finished. Now you could add a wait_queue
> and a flag and wait for it to finish. But that is not very elegant.

Do we need the pci_sysfs_init initcall at all? Or to put it in other words, 
what does this initcall solve?
See my different approach eliminating this race at all.

> From which initcall is your driver probed?

The callstack looks like this:
> imx6_pcie_probe from platform_probe+0x5c/0xb8
> platform_probe from call_driver_probe+0x24/0x118
> call_driver_probe from really_probe+0xc4/0x31c
> really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x120
> __driver_probe_device from driver_probe_device+0x30/0xc0
> driver_probe_device from __driver_attach_async_helper+0x50/0xd8
> __driver_attach_async_helper from async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0x144
> async_run_entry_fn from process_one_work+0x1c4/0x3d0
> process_one_work from worker_thread+0x50/0x41c
> worker_thread from kthread+0xec/0x104
> kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c

So technically the device is not probed from within a initcall but a kthread. 
It is set to be probed asynchronous in imx6_pcie_driver.

This async call is scheduled in __driver_attach, from this callstack:
> __driver_attach from bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc8
> bus_for_each_dev from bus_add_driver+0xf0/0x1f4
> bus_add_driver from driver_register+0x7c/0x118
> driver_register from do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x180
> do_one_initcall from do_initcalls+0xe0/0x114
> do_initcalls from kernel_init_freeable+0xd8/0x100
> kernel_init_freeable from kernel_init+0x18/0x12c
> kernel_init from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c

Best regards,
Alexander
-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-16 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16  9:15 [PATCH v2 1/1] Guard pci_create_sysfs_dev_files with atomic value Alexander Stein
2023-03-16  9:18 ` Alexander Stein
2023-03-16  9:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2023-03-16  9:33   ` Alexander Stein
2023-03-16 11:17     ` Oliver Neukum
2023-03-16 11:58       ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2023-03-16 12:23         ` Oliver Neukum
2023-03-16 13:16           ` Alexander Stein
2023-03-16 14:01             ` Oliver Neukum
2023-03-16 15:00               ` Alexander Stein
2023-03-21  9:09               ` Oliver Neukum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4888964.44csPzL39Z@steina-w \
    --to=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=korneliuszo@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox