From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755856AbYGXPrk (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:47:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751439AbYGXPrb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:47:31 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:44087 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750995AbYGXPrb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:47:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4888A410.3020108@goop.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:47:28 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Mark McLoughlin , Eduardo Habkost , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: call early_cpu_init at the same point References: <488520A2.1080701@goop.org> <20080724102856.GB28817@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080724102856.GB28817@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > >> Call early_cpu_init() at the same (early) point in setup_arch(). The >> x86_64 code was calling it relatively late, after when other arch code >> need to do cpu-related setup which depends on it. >> > > applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks Jeremy. > Thanks. Curious to see if this causes any breakage, especially in numa-ish type systems. J