Re: [git pull] cpus4096 fixes

[Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>]

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2008 06:15:26 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> Please pull the latest cpus4096-fixes git tree from:
>> No. Not without explanations.
>>
>> Quite frankly, this "fix" looks like a huge stinking pile of sh*t.
>>
>> I can't follow that thread on lkml.org (horrible web interface with
>> hard-to-follow threading), and I'm too lazy to bother to look in my lkml
>> email archives, but whoever said
>>
>>   "The simple version is just a static array of [NR_CPUS] cpumask_t's."
>>
>> and then implemented this piece of shit is a complete and utter moron.
> 
> How awesome, Linus is talking about me!
> 
> Your idea is clever, thanks.  This patch was a bandaid to save us from the 
> unbearably fugly "cpumask_of_cpu_ptr_declare(cpu_mask)".  I was going to rip 
> this code out as soon as possible, but with your trick we should keep it.
> 
> The 4k CPU patches have been sliding in without review up until now.  We need 
> a serious think about how to handle cpumask_t that doesn't fit on the stack.  
> 
> Hey, since Mike put his Signed-off-by above mine and didn't put a From line 
> when he took my patch, WFT am I taking responsibility? :)
> 
> Rusty.


Just so I don't make the same mistake, this:


Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>


Should have been this:

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>

?

Thanks,
Mike