From: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86: AMD microcode patch loading v2 fixes
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:28:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48903431.9060707@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <488F581B.7060009@qualcomm.com>
Max Krasnyansky schrieb:
> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>> 2008/7/29 Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>:
>>> Fixed coding style issues.
>>
>> I have a comment on the abstraction layer (microcode_ops).
>>
>> [ Not that I've looked very carefully at it so far, nor I pretend to
>> be at-ease with this 'microcode' topic to make any design judgements
>> :-) ]
>>
>> but would it be somehow possible to not have set_cpus_allowed_ptr()
>> code in arch-dependent parts? Let's say the mechanism of how to run
>> certain arch-specific code (and synchronization) on a given cpu should
>> be a prerogative of (and placed in) the generic part...
>>
>> Note, this code will likely happily give you an oops if you run
>> cpu_down/up() ;-)
>>
>> I also wondered, is there a requirement that when a new cpu is brought
>> up, microcode updates {should,must} be done as early as possible, say
>> before any tasks have a chance to run on it? Or can the update be a
>> bit delayed? e.g. we don't do it from cpu-hotplug handlers.
>
> Dmitry looks like you missed my email. I already asked that question and
> proposed a couple of options (workqueue and ipi).
> Tigran said that he does not know. Maybe Peter does.
>
> My guess is that it does not have to be done synchronously and can be
> delayed. There is no guaranty that microcode CPU hotplug handler will
> run before all the other handlers. Which by definition means that some
> things will start running on the cpu before the microcode is updated.
> Hence we might as well do the update outside of the cpu hotplug path.
>
> Max
>
>
>
>
Since ucode updates may fix severe issues, it is supposed to happen as early as
possible. If you re-plug your CPU into your socket, your BIOS also applies a
ucode patch, but that won't necessarily be the latest and critical one.
Peter
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-29 15:41 [patch 0/4] x86: AMD microcode patch loading v2 fixes Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 15:41 ` [patch 1/4] x86: AMD microcode patch loader style corrections Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 15:41 ` [patch 2/4] x86: Intel " Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 15:41 ` [patch 3/4] x86: Moved function declarations out from AMD microcode patch loader to heade file Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 15:41 ` [patch 4/4] x86: Minor pointer type cast in AMD microcode patch loader Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 16:18 ` [patch 0/4] x86: AMD microcode patch loading v2 fixes Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-29 17:49 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-29 19:37 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-30 9:28 ` Peter Oruba [this message]
2008-07-30 9:57 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-30 10:34 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-30 16:35 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-30 18:38 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-31 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-01 2:23 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-30 16:54 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-30 20:59 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-01 2:18 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-01 11:25 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-01 12:21 ` Peter Oruba
2008-08-01 15:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-31 21:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-31 22:02 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-31 22:12 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48903431.9060707@amd.com \
--to=peter.oruba@amd.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox