public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Max.Krasnyansky@qualcomm.com
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
	jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:00:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <489A7359.8090607@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218052854-5020-1-git-send-email-Krasnyansky@qualcomm.com>

Max.Krasnyansky@qualcomm.com wrote:
> From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
> 
> For some reason we had redundant parsers registered for maxcpus=. 
> One in init/main.c and another in arch/x86/smpboot.c
> So I nuked the one in arch/x86.
> 
> Also 64-bit kernels used to handle maxcpus= as documented in
> Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt. CPUs with 'id > maxcpus' are initialized
> but not booted. 32-bit version for some reason ignored them even though
> all the infrastructure for booting them later is there.
> 
> In the current mainline both 64 and 32 bit versions are broken. I'm
> too lazy to look through git history but I'm guessing it happened as
> part of the i386 and x86_64 unification.
> 
> This patch restores the correct behaviour. I've tested x86_64 version on
> 4- and 8- way Core2 and 2-way Opteron based machines. Various config
> combinations SMP, !SMP, CPU_HOTPLUG, !CPU_HOTPLUG.
> Booted with maxcpus=1 and maxcpus=4, etc. Everything is working as expected.
> 
> I cannot test 32-bit version (no 32-bit machines here).
> 

I booted my 2-core x86_32 box with maxcpus=1, and saw cpu1 was offline,
and then I got softlockup BUG immediately when I onlined cpu1:

SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code
CPU 1 irqstacks, hard=c078c000 soft=c076c000
Booting processor 1/1 ip 6000
Initializing CPU#1
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5600.37 BogoMIPS (lpj=2800188)
CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 1024K
CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
CPU: Processor Core ID: 1
Intel machine check architecture supported.
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1.
CPU1: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (24) available
CPU1: Thermal monitoring enabled
CPU1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz stepping 04
checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]: passed.
Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 1
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 216s! [events/0:0]
Modules linked in: bridge stp llc autofs4 dm_mirror dm_log dm_mod snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore r8169 snd_page_alloc sg button sata_sis pata_sis ata_generic libata sd_mod scsi_mod ext3 jbd mbcache uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
irq event stamp: 156
hardirqs last  enabled at (155): [<c044407f>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
hardirqs last disabled at (156): [<c04eee88>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0xc/0x10
softirqs last  enabled at (152): [<c042c2f3>] __do_softirq+0xe3/0xe9
softirqs last disabled at (95): [<c04058eb>] do_softirq+0x65/0xb4

Pid: 0, comm: events/0 Not tainted (2.6.27-rc1 #224)
EIP: 0060:[<c04088ba>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 1
EIP is at mwait_idle+0x3c/0x4a
EAX: 00000000 EBX: e3e48008 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e3e48f9c ESP: e3e48f98
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000000 CR3: 00768000 CR4: 000006d0
DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
 [<c0402591>] cpu_idle+0xbf/0xdf
 [<c05fb737>] start_secondary+0x16b/0x170
 =======================


216s should be the time since the machine booted up.


(maybe off-topic)
I never succeed to offline cpu1, it caused the kernel to hang
whenver I offlined cpu1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-07  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-06 20:00 [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option Max.Krasnyansky
2008-08-06 20:23 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-07  4:00 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2008-08-07  5:48   ` Jeff Chua
2008-08-07 17:22     ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-07 17:21   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-08  2:13     ` Li Zefan
2008-08-11 18:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 18:28   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-11 18:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 18:46       ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-11 18:40   ` Max Krasnyansky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=489A7359.8090607@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Max.Krasnyansky@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox