From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Allow compile with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y, X86_PAE not set on gcc 3.4.5
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:01:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <489C89FA.5000301@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080808161331.GF14495@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 08:21:41AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y is why I never hit it before.
>>>
>>> It does not seem to be just one dodgy Redhat compiler (as I assumed in
>>> the Bugzilla entry) but the whole 3.4 series of gcc which makes our
>>> resolution of saying that this specific compiler is broken invalid.
>>>
>>> Considering that we officially support all compilers >= 3.2 this is
>>> just one more case where we have to add to the kernel a workaround for
>>> a broken compiler.
>>>
>>>
>> Yes. I'm happy to write off a specific rpm package, but a whole series
>> is a different matter.
>>
>> Adding
>>
>> if (PREALLOCATED_PMDS == 0)
>> return;
>>
>> in the appropriate places with a small comment seems like the right answer.
>>
>
> The patch below you suggested fixes it for me with gcc 3.4.6.
>
>
>> J
>>
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
OK. Want to submit this as a proper patch?
Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Thanks,
J
>
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ static void pgd_prepopulate_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd, pmd_t *pmds[])
>
> pud = pud_offset(pgd, 0);
>
> + if (PREALLOCATED_PMDS == 0)
> + return;
> +
> for (addr = i = 0; i < PREALLOCATED_PMDS;
> i++, pud++, addr += PUD_SIZE) {
> pmd_t *pmd = pmds[i];
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-08 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-08 5:04 Allow compile with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y, X86_PAE not set on gcc 3.4.5 Simon Horman
2008-08-08 6:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-08 7:50 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-08 8:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-08 15:21 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-08 16:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-08 18:01 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-08-08 18:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-08 20:46 ` [PATCH] x86: work around gcc 3.4.x bug Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-09 6:29 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-11 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=489C89FA.5000301@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox