From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rc1 for set_cpus_allowed_ptr
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:49:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A0C213.4090305@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080811224636.GA25577@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
>>> And I was hoping to do -rc3 today. Can I please have pull-requests for the
>>> appropriate urgent scheduler/x86 fixes? Or should I just take these as
>>> patches?
>> It'd be nice if -rc3 included my cpuset patch so that we could put circular
>> locking issues in the cpu hotplug path to the rest.
>> Ingo, I'm talking about this:
>> [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
>
> the latest (-v4) version of the patch was submitted just half an hour
> ago and it's rather large/complex, with a few unrelated changes
> (whitespace, etc.) mixed in as well. I'd like to wait for Paul's final
> ack for -v4 (he has already agreed with the approach in general), and
> wanted to have it tested myself as well, at least minimally.
Fair enough.
btw Whitespace and other cosmetic changes were requested by reviewers.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-11 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-08 19:44 Regression in 2.6.27-rc1 for set_cpus_allowed_ptr Langsdorf, Mark
2008-08-08 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-08 21:31 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-11 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 14:01 ` Langsdorf, Mark
2008-08-11 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 14:28 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-11 22:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-11 22:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 22:14 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-11 22:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 22:49 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-08-11 22:55 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48A0C213.4090305@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox