From: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: Change the default value of nr_irqs from 32 to NR_IRQs
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:32:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AB11A3.4060102@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440808191124v39ce2aa9rb548d3bdd75ca25c@mail.gmail.com>
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Alex Nixon (Intern)
> <Alex.Nixon@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> If the number of discovered IRQs is suspiciously low, this patch causes
>>>> the number reported to default to NR_IRQS, rather than 32. NR_IRQS has
>>>> already been defined to be a >sensible value for the current system (in
>>>> particular, at least 224 when paravirtualisation is involved).
>>>>
>>> if only one ioapic, nr will be 24<<1, you will get 48. Does pv has io apic
>>> ?
>>>
>>> YH
>>>
>> I'm not sure about the general case, but Xen does not (Jeremy correct me if
>> I'm wrong).
>>
>> Unless I'm missing something (which I may well be; I'm new to this area of
>> code), it seems more logical anyway to default back to the calculated
>> system-specific value (NR_IRQS), instead of 32, which seems rather
>> arbitrary.
>
> can you try !CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ and CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ ?
>
> YH
Sorry I should have mentioned originally - the bug occurs both with
CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ enabled, and disabled.
- Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-19 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 16:55 [PATCH] X86: Change the default value of nr_irqs from 32 to NR_IRQs Alex Nixon
2008-08-19 17:44 ` Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <0E902970173AF84089673FA54B7FE78A2CA11D@lonpexch01.citrite.net>
2008-08-19 18:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-19 18:32 ` Alex Nixon [this message]
2008-08-19 19:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-19 19:50 ` Alex Nixon
2008-08-19 20:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-19 23:19 ` Alex Nixon
2008-08-20 23:23 ` Alex Nixon
2008-08-20 23:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-21 23:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-20 23:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48AB11A3.4060102@citrix.com \
--to=alex.nixon@citrix.com \
--cc=Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox