From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: paccept() oddity
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:50:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AC4B6E.4040409@gmail.com> (raw)
Ulrich,
[
2.6.27-rc has paccept():
int paccept(int fd, struct sockaddr *sockaddr, socklen_t *addrlen,
const sigset_t *sigmask, int setsize, int flags)
]
While considering the sigset argument for paccept() (see my previous
message), and testing that system call, I realized that there is a certain
oddness in the implementation of paccept().
Like accept(), paccept() automatically restarts if interrupted by a signal
handler that was established with the SA_RESTART flag.
On the other hand, pselect(), ppoll(), and epoll_pwait() are never restarted
if interrupted by a handler, even if the handler was established with
SA_RESTART. (This is the same as with select(), poll(), and epoll_wait().)
It seems to me that it makes little sense to restart paccept(), especially in
the case where it is interrupted by a handler for one of the signals that is
in sigmask, since the whole point of calling paccept() is to block until a
connection is received, or until one of the signals in sigmask is caught().
How about changing paccept() so that it is never automatically restarted if
interrupted by a signal handler, regardless of the SA_RESTART flag. (In
other words, paccept() should be consistent with pselect(), ppoll(), and
epoll_pwait(), rather than being consistent with accept().) What are your
thoughts?
Cheers,
Michael
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-20 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-20 16:50 Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2008-08-29 20:45 ` paccept() oddity Michael Kerrisk
2008-09-08 13:31 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-09-10 18:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-11 0:38 ` Roland McGrath
2008-09-11 5:47 ` Michael Kerrisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48AC4B6E.4040409@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox