public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Januszewski <spock@gentoo.org>,
	Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Nickurak <kernel-bugs@atrus.rifetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: disable hrtick implementation
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:43:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AC65CD.9080108@gawab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219217091.10800.395.camel@twins>

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 15:54 -0700, Justin Madru wrote:
>> The hrtick implementation in 2.6.25 and .26 has been known to cause boot
>> problems with at least Intel GMA cards. see:
>>
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15602
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10892
>>
>> A full fix to hrtick went into 2.6.27
>> (31656519e132f6612584815f128c83976a9aaaef),
>> but that fix is too intrusive to backport. Henceforth, we default to
>> disable hrtick.
>
> Thing is, I'm still not understanding how, or if, the old code is wrong.
>
> That said, this will paper over the problem just fine, and as its old
> kernels we're talking about I don't particularly care.

Fair enough.

All I know is that right when I started testing .25-rc1 I kept getting a 
garbled boot splash, blank screen, and even lock-ups during booting. It 
seemed to be that if I disabled the boot splash and/or started x 
manually the problem would rarely occur. So, maybe the first change to 
hrtick just exposed a bug in the boot splash or the x server. If that's 
true then, I don't get why right when .27-rc1 was out all the boot 
problems were gone.

Bisecting found both commits (introduce and fix) to be about hrtick. So 
maybe the commit that introduced my bug wasn't completely wrong, but at 
least it was not right enough because of the second commit was trying to 
fix something -- right? And the kernel still boots with hrtick disabled, 
I tested that.


> Just occured to me that a Kconfig change that always makes
> CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK not set will also do.
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
>> Tested-by: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>>
>> --- a/kernel/sched_features.h
>> +++ b/kernel/sched_features.h
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>> SCHED_FEAT(AFFINE_WAKEUPS, 1)
>> SCHED_FEAT(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY, 1)
>> SCHED_FEAT(SYNC_WAKEUPS, 1)
>> -SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, 1)
>> +SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, 0)
>> SCHED_FEAT(DOUBLE_TICK, 0)
>> SCHED_FEAT(NORMALIZED_SLEEPER, 1)
>> SCHED_FEAT(DEADLINE, 1)
>>

Wouldn't disabling CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS (in the menu) also disable 
CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK? In any case what about this patch below?


The hrtick implementation in 2.6.25 and .26 has been known to cause boot
problems with at least Intel GMA cards. see:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15602
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10892

A full fix to hrtick went into 2.6.27 
(31656519e132f6612584815f128c83976a9aaaef),
but that fix is too intrusive to backport. Henceforth, we default to 
disable hrtick.

Signed-off-by: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
Tested-by: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

--- a/kernel/Kconfig.hz
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.hz
@@ -55,4 +55,5 @@
     default 1000 if HZ_1000

 config SCHED_HRTICK
-    def_bool HIGH_RES_TIMERS && X86
+    bool
+    default n


      reply	other threads:[~2008-08-20 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-18 18:21 Backport hr-tick fix into .25/.26 Justin Madru
2008-08-19  0:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-19  2:43   ` Justin Madru
2008-08-19  6:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-19  9:25     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-19  9:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-19 18:22         ` Greg KH
2008-08-19 19:30           ` Justin Madru
2008-08-19 19:44             ` Greg KH
2008-08-19 22:54               ` [PATCH] sched: disable hrtick implementation Justin Madru
2008-08-20  7:24                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 18:43                   ` Justin Madru [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48AC65CD.9080108@gawab.com \
    --to=jdm64@gawab.com \
    --cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=kernel-bugs@atrus.rifetech.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=romano.giannetti@gmail.com \
    --cc=spock@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox