public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdb: Merkey's Linux Kernel Debugger  2.6.27-rc4 released
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:09:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AD7705.2000404@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808212337.38626.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>

Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 21 August 2008 22:26, jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com wrote:
>> It's simple to reproduce.  Take away the volatile declaration for the
>> rlock_t structure in mdb-ia32.c (rlock_t debug_lock) in all code
>> references and watch the thing lock up in SMP with multiple processors in
>> the debugger each stuck with their own local copy of debug_lock.
> 
> You should disable preempt before getting the processor id. Can't see any
> other possible bugs, but you should be able to see from the disassembly
> pretty easily.

debug_lock() is AFAICS only called from contexts which have preemption
disabled.  Last time around I recommended to Jeff to document this
requirement on the calling context.

But even though preemption is disabled, debug_lock() is still incorrect
as I mentioned in my other post a minute ago.  It corrupts its .flags
and .count members.  (Or maybe it coincidentally doesn't as long as
volatile is around.)
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- =-=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-21 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-21  2:50 [ANNOUNCE] mdb: Merkey's Linux Kernel Debugger 2.6.27-rc4 released jmerkey
2008-08-21 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 10:57   ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 11:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 11:47       ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 12:03         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 14:53           ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 14:58             ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 12:05         ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 12:26           ` jmerkey
     [not found]             ` <43593.166.70.238.46.1219321595.squirrel@webmail.wolfmountaingroup.com >
2008-08-21 12:35               ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 13:37             ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21 14:09               ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-08-22  1:40                 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-22  6:32                   ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-22 11:54                     ` jmerkey
2008-08-22 12:36                       ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 14:09               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 14:30                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 14:14                   ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 14:48                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 16:21                 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-21 21:06               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-21 21:18                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 21:21                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-24  4:25                   ` jmerkey
2008-08-26  8:26                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-27  1:49                       ` jmerkey
2008-08-22  1:37                 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21 14:02             ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 14:08               ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 15:22                 ` Stefan Richter
2008-08-21 15:02                   ` jmerkey
2008-08-21 15:57         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 16:18           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 16:48             ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-24  0:01               ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-21 16:43           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48AD7705.2000404@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox