From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760195AbYHVAgs (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:36:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754142AbYHVAgj (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:36:39 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:33537 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753030AbYHVAgj (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:36:39 -0400 Message-ID: <48AE0A14.4090609@goop.org> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:36:36 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Nick Piggin , Andi Kleen , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Suresh Siddha , Jens Axboe , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] smp_call_function: don't use lock in call_function_data References: <48AE087C.4000408@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <48AE087C.4000408@goop.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > There's no need for a lock in call_function_data, since it's only used > to decrement-and-test a counter. Use an atomic instead. BTW, these two patches are against tip.git. J