From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>,
Gerhard Brauer <gerhard.brauer@web.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.{26.2,27-rc} oops on virtualbox
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:32:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B43E2E.5000207@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080826171822.GB14906@Krystal>
I have been unable to replicate this on my own hardware mostly because
my testing machine decided to blow its DVD drive in some very strange
way, but I did pick apart the data from Luiz, and found it very interesting:
The code sequence before patching looks like:
c012fc69: 51 push %ecx
c012fc6a: 52 push %edx
c012fc6b: ff 15 40 b9 41 c0 call *0xc041b940
c012fc71: 5a pop %edx
c012fc72: 59 pop %ecx
After patching:
50 9d 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 <00> 00
... which disassembles to (in Intel notation):
C012FC69 50 push eax
C012FC6A 9D popfd
C012FC6B 0F1F840000000000 nop dword [eax+eax+0x0]
We do, indeed have a return point that falls in the *middle* of a
patched instruction, and if the patching happens in the middle of the
instruction call, then, well, bad things happen.
Furthermore, why on Earth is %ecx/%edx pushed and popped in-line here?
Surely it should be the responsibility of the PV call to present a
no-clobber interface (using an assembly wrapper if necessary[*]), rather
than bloating every callsite like this?
-hpa
[*] One can compile gcc code with -fcall-saved-* to use nonstandard
register conventions. Unfortunately stock gcc only lets you do this
with a file parameter, and doesn't support doing this with attributes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-26 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-20 19:29 2.6.{26.2,27-rc} oops on virtualbox Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-21 21:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 6:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-22 14:39 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-22 15:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-22 16:29 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-22 16:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-22 17:20 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-22 18:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 19:40 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-22 20:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 20:55 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-22 20:57 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-22 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-26 14:18 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-26 14:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-26 16:09 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-26 16:13 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-26 17:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-26 17:32 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-08-26 18:02 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-26 18:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-26 19:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-26 20:34 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-26 20:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-26 21:25 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-26 21:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-26 21:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-27 0:13 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-27 19:13 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-27 23:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-28 13:30 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-31 9:29 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-31 13:28 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2008-08-31 14:03 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-31 14:09 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-09-21 13:41 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-09-22 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-24 13:24 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-28 13:50 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-26 19:27 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-26 16:02 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-26 16:40 ` Gerhard Brauer
2008-08-22 17:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 17:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-22 17:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 19:10 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-22 19:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 19:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 19:42 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-08-22 14:28 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B43E2E.5000207@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=colin.king@ubuntu.com \
--cc=gerhard.brauer@web.de \
--cc=lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox