From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: lg@denx.de, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
marc.pignat@hevs.ch
Subject: Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:09:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B527F6.6040705@evidence.eu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080826131736.GA1916@fluff.org.uk>
Ben Dooks ha scritto:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:30:01PM +0200, Claudio Scordino wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a custom board equivalent to AT91RM9200DK.
>
> Is that exactly the same, or does it have changes?
No, it's really equivalent, that's why I used the same configuration.
>
> Note, this should have been sent to the linux-arm-kernel list, where
> it will be read by more of the developers who work on ARM, we don't
> all have time to sit on linux-kernel.
I see. I thought the right place for this kind of question was the
LKML. I will use linux-arm-kernel for future issues about Linux on ARM.
Anyway, eventually I found out that this is a bug of U-Boot (see
later) and not of Linux.
>
>> After commit
>>
>> 87fee013a23ad02821699aef5b76891b42959182
>>
>> [ARM] 4647/1: at91rm9200: Remove redundant machine-type verification
>> and manipulation
>>
>> I cannot boot my board anymore.
>
> Hmm, having looked at this, it would be very probably that your
> u-boot is not passing the right boot information to the kernel.
Right. U-Boot does not pass the right value when compiled for the
AT91RM9200DK board... I'm going to send an email to the U-Boot ML to
fix this bug.
Many thanks to all,
Claudio
--
Ing. Claudio Scordino
Software Engineer, PhD
Tel. +39-050-5492050
http://retis.sssup.it/~scordino/
Evidence Srl
Embedded Real-Time Solutions
http://www.evidence.eu.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-27 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-26 10:30 [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type Claudio Scordino
2008-08-26 12:43 ` Marc Pignat
2008-08-26 13:19 ` Russell King
2008-08-27 10:09 ` Claudio Scordino
2008-08-26 13:17 ` Ben Dooks
2008-08-27 10:09 ` Claudio Scordino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B527F6.6040705@evidence.eu.com \
--to=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=lg@denx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.pignat@hevs.ch \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox