From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756215AbYH1U0R (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:26:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753916AbYH1U0C (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:26:02 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:54918 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753683AbYH1U0B (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:26:01 -0400 Message-ID: <48B7090C.3030506@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:22:36 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: the arch/x86 maintainers , Stephen Rothwell , Austin Zhang , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Cleanup and updates of x86 CPU definitions References: <48B629D2.7040809@zytor.com> <48B70660.5020003@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <48B70660.5020003@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> +#define X86_FEATURE_VMX (4*32+ 5) /* Hardware virtualization */ >> +#define X86_FEATURE_SMX (4*32+ 6) /* "Safer" mode */ >> > Is this supposed to appear as "Safer" in /proc/cpuinfo? Or should this > be ``Safer''? It was a dumb-ass thinko on my part (already fixed in tip:x86/cpu). -hpa