public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: sched_mc_power_savings broken with CGROUPS+CPUSETS
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:17:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B8593E.7050205@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080829131514.GS4801@dirshya.in.ibm.com>

Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> sched_mc_power_savings seems to be broken with CGROUPS+CPUSETS.
> When CONFIG_CPUSETS=y the attached BUG_ON() is being hit.
> 
> I added a BUG_ON to check if SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE is set at
> SD_LV_CPU whenever sched_mc_power_savings is set.
> 
> This BUG is hit when config CONFIG_CPUSETS (depends on CONFIG_CGROUPS)
> is just compiled in while this is never hit when they are compiled
> out.  The fact that SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE being cleared even when
> sched_mc_power_savings = 1 completely breaks the
> sched_mc_power_savings heuristics.
> 
> To recreate the problem,
> Have sched_mc power savings enabled CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y
> Add this BUG_ON()
> 
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings
> 
> Try these these on a multi core x86 box.
> 
> sched_mc_power_savings seems to be broken from 2.6.26-rc1, but
> I do not have a confirmation that the root cause is same in all
> successive versions. sched_mc_power_savings works perfect in
> 2.6.25.
> 
> Please help me root cause the issue.  Please point me to changes that
> may potential cause this bug.

That's my fault. I redid domain rebuild/hotplug handling awhile ago and missed
the fact that partition_sched_domains() is trying to avoid unnecessary domain
rebuilds. Primary issue at the time was circular locking issues and the the
testing that I was doing then was exercising a bunch of different scenarios
(ie cpu up/down, cpuset create/destroy, mcpowersave on/off) and I did not
notice that mcpowersave did not actually trigger domain rebuilds.

Anyway, I sent you guys a patch that should fix this issue.
Please confirm.

Max

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-29 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-29 13:15 sched_mc_power_savings broken with CGROUPS+CPUSETS Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-08-29 13:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-29 14:05   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-08-29 20:29   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-30 11:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-30 20:42       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-08-30 21:43         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-29 20:17 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-08-30 20:02   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48B8593E.7050205@qualcomm.com \
    --to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox