From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: sched_mc_power_savings broken with CGROUPS+CPUSETS
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:17:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B8593E.7050205@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080829131514.GS4801@dirshya.in.ibm.com>
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sched_mc_power_savings seems to be broken with CGROUPS+CPUSETS.
> When CONFIG_CPUSETS=y the attached BUG_ON() is being hit.
>
> I added a BUG_ON to check if SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE is set at
> SD_LV_CPU whenever sched_mc_power_savings is set.
>
> This BUG is hit when config CONFIG_CPUSETS (depends on CONFIG_CGROUPS)
> is just compiled in while this is never hit when they are compiled
> out. The fact that SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE being cleared even when
> sched_mc_power_savings = 1 completely breaks the
> sched_mc_power_savings heuristics.
>
> To recreate the problem,
> Have sched_mc power savings enabled CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y
> Add this BUG_ON()
>
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings
>
> Try these these on a multi core x86 box.
>
> sched_mc_power_savings seems to be broken from 2.6.26-rc1, but
> I do not have a confirmation that the root cause is same in all
> successive versions. sched_mc_power_savings works perfect in
> 2.6.25.
>
> Please help me root cause the issue. Please point me to changes that
> may potential cause this bug.
That's my fault. I redid domain rebuild/hotplug handling awhile ago and missed
the fact that partition_sched_domains() is trying to avoid unnecessary domain
rebuilds. Primary issue at the time was circular locking issues and the the
testing that I was doing then was exercising a bunch of different scenarios
(ie cpu up/down, cpuset create/destroy, mcpowersave on/off) and I did not
notice that mcpowersave did not actually trigger domain rebuilds.
Anyway, I sent you guys a patch that should fix this issue.
Please confirm.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-29 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-29 13:15 sched_mc_power_savings broken with CGROUPS+CPUSETS Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-08-29 13:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-29 14:05 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-08-29 20:29 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-30 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-30 20:42 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-08-30 21:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-29 20:17 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-08-30 20:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B8593E.7050205@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox