From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] High, likely incorrect process cpu usage counters with kvm and 2.6.2[67]
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:16:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BBB2FF.9040104@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7848160808311109v70db1e99hb6af3b89c34d0d8c@mail.gmail.com>
Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:
>
>> Running an idle Windows VM on Linux 2.6.26+ with kvm, one sees high values
>> for the kvm process in top (30%-70% cpu), where one would normally expect
>> 0%-1%. Surprisingly, the per-cpu system counters show almost 100% idle,
>> leading me to believe this is an accounting error and that the process does
>> not actually consume this much cpu.
>>
>
> Busted process accounting - This looks the same as
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 .
> Please verify. Peter's patch in latest git stops showing "incorrect
> looking" CPU usage but at least the process times are still wrong,
> horribly.
> In fact the CPU usage thing in -rc5 is likely also incorrect but I
> need to analyze that bit a little more.
>
> From Today's Git -
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>
> 12961 parag 20 0 83000 8908 6628 R 0 0.1 5124415h npviewer.bin
>
>
Yes, it looks very similar. In my tests, %CPU is consistent with TIME;
it's just not consistent with what's actually happening and with the
global statistics.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-01 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-31 15:43 [REGRESSION] High, likely incorrect process cpu usage counters with kvm and 2.6.2[67] Avi Kivity
2008-08-31 18:09 ` Parag Warudkar
2008-09-01 9:16 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-09-01 14:58 ` [PATCH] sched_clock: fix NOHZ interaction Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-01 16:17 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-05 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48BBB2FF.9040104@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox