public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:44:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BC2A03.9000104@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809011311210.3243@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>

Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Larry Finger wrote:
> 
>> An ancient laptop of mine started throwing errors from b43legacy when I
>> started using 2.6.27 on it. This has been bisected to commit bfc0f59 "x86:
>> merge tsc calibration". Incidentally, I was appalled at the number of build
>> errors that were found while bisecting in this region. Every commit from
>> 2.6.26-rc9-00715 to at least -00719 had include errors that had to be fixed
>> before it would compile. Those fixes are the only reason that the builds below
>> are "dirty".
>>
>> The CPU in this computer is an AMD-K6 at stepping 0c and running at 450 MHz.
>>
>> The critical differences in the dmesg output between the "good" and "bad"
>> results indicate a factor of 2 difference in the clock speed, and are shown
>> below:
> 
>> +Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 500037272 ns)
> 
>> -Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 83950402 ns)
> 
> In both cases the TSC is ahead of the pm_timer, which looks like the
> pm_timer is behaving strange.
> 
> Can you please disable the pm_timer (in the kernel config,
> unfortunately there is no command line option for that) for a test and
> provide the relevant output of demsg ?

It took a while to figure out how to kill the pm_timer. I finally did 
it by changing the default to no rather than yes. I also reset the 
bisection and compiled a full -rc4 kernel.

What I hope is the relevant output of dmesg is below. The clock rate 
is correctly determined, and the b43legacy errors are gone.

Thanks - Larry

Linux version 2.6.27-rc4-wl-15747-g2e3bbe3-dirty (finger@larrylap) 
(gcc version 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 
135036] (SUSE Linux) ) #36 Mon Sep 1 12:19:13 ACT 2008

--snip--

Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda3 vga=0x314 resume=/dev/sda2 
splash=silent
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 10, 4096 bytes)
TSC calibrated against PIT
Detected 428.823 MHz processor.
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
console [tty0] enabled
Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Memory: 252692k/262080k available (1442k kernel code, 8836k reserved, 
613k data, 188k init, 0k highmem)
virtual kernel memory layout:
     fixmap  : 0xffffa000 - 0xfffff000   (  20 kB)
     vmalloc : 0xd0800000 - 0xffff8000   ( 759 MB)
     lowmem  : 0xc0000000 - 0xcfff0000   ( 255 MB)
       .init : 0xc0306000 - 0xc0335000   ( 188 kB)
       .data : 0xc0268b54 - 0xc0302208   ( 613 kB)
       .text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc0268b54   (1442 kB)
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor 
mode...Ok.
CPA: page pool initialized 1 of 1 pages preallocated
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer 
frequency.. 857.64 BogoMIPS (lpj=1715292)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-01 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-31 22:54 Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 Larry Finger
2008-09-01 11:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 15:37   ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 17:49     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 17:44   ` Larry Finger [this message]
2008-09-01 18:31     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 19:10       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 20:07         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 21:30           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 22:33             ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:56               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 23:24                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02  6:37                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-02 12:21                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 23:16             ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02  3:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02  3:35                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02  4:54                   ` Larry Finger
2008-09-02  9:17                   ` Alan Cox
2008-09-02 12:15                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 15:09                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 18:14                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 18:41                         ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-02 21:16                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 18:42                         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 21:13                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 22:21                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 23:10                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-03  1:49                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 22:54                           ` [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-03  2:14                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-03  9:11                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04  1:14                                 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04  2:56                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  3:16                                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04  3:59                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  4:10                                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04  4:20                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  4:27                                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04  4:25                                         ` Willy Tarreau
2008-09-04  4:53                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  5:09                                             ` Willy Tarreau
2008-09-04  1:18                                 ` [PATCH] Change warning message in TSC calibration Alok Kataria
2008-09-03  2:51                             ` [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues Larry Finger
2008-09-03  4:00                               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-03  4:34                                 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-05 13:45                       ` Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 Mark Lord
2008-09-02 17:17                 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-09-01 19:36       ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 20:09         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 20:23           ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 20:45             ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 18:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 19:08       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48BC2A03.9000104@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox