From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Rui Sousa <rui.p.m.sousa@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATH] Fix compilation when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is not set
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:29:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C0291D.6060205@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809041947.54339.rui.p.m.sousa@gmail.com>
Rui Sousa wrote:
> On Thursday 4 September 2008 19:14, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Rui Sousa <rui.p.m.sousa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes compilation if CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is ever
>>>> disabled (which is currently not allowed by Kconfig). Alternatively we
>>>> could just remove the option altogether and the associated code paths.
>>>> Since the compilation error has been in the tree for at least two
>>>> years and no one noticed it, I guess we don't really have the need for
>>>> CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=n. Boot tested on x86 UP.
>>> applied to tip/core/locking - thanks Rui.
>>>
>>> since you fixed it i prefer the fix over the removal. We could still
>>> remove the !TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT now (in a separate commit) and
>>> simpify this header a bit that way. Thus if someone needs the
>>> !TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT mode of build for future work, it can be
>>> restored via a simple revert.
>> Hi, it seems that this patch breaks uml build.
>
> Hi Hiroshi,
>
>> kernel/printk.c: In function 'vprintk':
>> kernel/printk.c:674: error: implicit declaration of function
>> 'raw_local_irq_save' kernel/printk.c:772: error: implicit declaration of
>> function 'raw_local_irq_restore'
>
> With the patch bellow it compiles (make ARCH=um with a x86 host), but I'm
> really out of my league on this one...
Hi Rui,
with this patch, build and boot (on my x86_64 box) looks ok.
I CC-ed to uml people to check this.
thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
>
>> thanks,
>> Hiroshi Shimamoto
>
> Thanks,
> Rui
>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/asm-um/system-generic.h b/include/asm-um/system-generic.h
> index 5bcfa35..f1ea4da 100644
> --- a/include/asm-um/system-generic.h
> +++ b/include/asm-um/system-generic.h
> @@ -4,15 +4,15 @@
> #include "asm/arch/system.h"
>
> #undef switch_to
> -#undef local_irq_save
> -#undef local_irq_restore
> -#undef local_irq_disable
> -#undef local_irq_enable
> -#undef local_save_flags
> -#undef local_irq_restore
> -#undef local_irq_enable
> -#undef local_irq_disable
> -#undef local_irq_save
> +#undef raw_local_irq_save
> +#undef raw_local_irq_restore
> +#undef raw_local_irq_disable
> +#undef raw_local_irq_enable
> +#undef raw_local_save_flags
> +#undef raw_local_irq_restore
> +#undef raw_local_irq_enable
> +#undef raw_local_irq_disable
> +#undef raw_local_irq_save
> #undef irqs_disabled
>
> extern void *switch_to(void *prev, void *next, void *last);
> @@ -23,21 +23,21 @@ extern int get_signals(void);
> extern void block_signals(void);
> extern void unblock_signals(void);
>
> -#define local_save_flags(flags) do { typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> +#define raw_local_save_flags(flags) do { typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> (flags) = get_signals(); } while(0)
> -#define local_irq_restore(flags) do { typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> +#define raw_local_irq_restore(flags) do { typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> set_signals(flags); } while(0)
>
> -#define local_irq_save(flags) do { local_save_flags(flags); \
> - local_irq_disable(); } while(0)
> +#define raw_local_irq_save(flags) do { raw_local_save_flags(flags); \
> + raw_local_irq_disable(); } while(0)
>
> -#define local_irq_enable() unblock_signals()
> -#define local_irq_disable() block_signals()
> +#define raw_local_irq_enable() unblock_signals()
> +#define raw_local_irq_disable() block_signals()
>
> #define irqs_disabled() \
> ({ \
> unsigned long flags; \
> - local_save_flags(flags); \
> + raw_local_save_flags(flags); \
> (flags == 0); \
> })
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-04 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-03 15:53 [PATH] Fix compilation when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is not set Rui Sousa
2008-09-04 14:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 17:14 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-04 17:47 ` Rui Sousa
2008-09-04 18:29 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto [this message]
2008-09-05 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C0291D.6060205@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rui.p.m.sousa@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox