From: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Benchmarking results: DSS elapsed time values w/ rq_affinity=0/1 - Jens' for-2.6.28 tree
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:19:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C15C02.7060504@hp.com> (raw)
Some DSS results from a 32-way ia64 machine set up to try and analyze
Oracle OLTP & DSS loads (128GB RAM, >200 disks). The data collected was
the elapsed time for DSS runs w/ 128 MBRs and 128 Readers, running on a
kernel generated from Jens Axboe's origin/for-2.6.28 tree. I alternated
runs, setting rq_affinity to 0 and 1 for all disks at the beginning of
each run.
There are a total of 68 data points for each alternative, and the
overall results show a decided improvement for this type of load with
rq_affinity set to 1:
rq=0: min=27.440000 avg=27.980500 max=28.500000 sdev=0.296827
rq=1: min=26.900000 avg=27.071500 max=27.480000 sdev=0.125169
Not only do we see about a 3.25% improvement in reduced average time, we
also see that the run-to-run deviations are much smaller as well. For a
pictorial representation, check out the graph @
http://free.linux.hp.com/~adb/jens/08-09-05/dss.png
The red and green areas illustrate the delta from the average for all
the data points with that rq_affinity setting. (Red being rq_affinity=0,
green being rq_affinity=1.)
I collected some vmstat & iostat data, and will be evaluating that as
well, and perhaps looking into lockstat & profiling data (time permitting).
The system has been set up as part of a collaboration between HP & Red
Hat's Linux performance teams, and we've been using it to analyze
performance characteristics of Oracle loads on large-ish systems, as
well as for evaluating potential code changes.
Alan D. Brunelle
HP Linux Kernel Technology Team
next reply other threads:[~2008-09-05 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-05 16:19 Alan D. Brunelle [this message]
2008-09-06 23:21 ` Benchmarking results: DSS elapsed time values w/ rq_affinity=0/1 - Jens' for-2.6.28 tree Alan D. Brunelle
2008-09-08 18:10 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-08 22:30 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-09-09 16:54 ` Alan D. Brunelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C15C02.7060504@hp.com \
--to=alan.brunelle@hp.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox