Re: [PATCH 0/3] smp: reduce stack requirements for smp_call_function_mask

Jes Sorensen
2008-09-08T09:48:53Z

Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Applies to linux-2.6.tip/master (with FUZZ).
>
> applied to tip/cpus4096, thanks Mike.
>
> I'm still wondering whether we should get rid of non-reference based
> cpumask_t altogether ...

Cool,

I think we should, it's like a ticking bomb waiting to explode on us
eventually. IMHO it was a big mistake to allow cpumask_t being passed
by value in the first place.

Cheers,
Jes