From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sunrpc: fix oops in rpc_create() when the mount namespace is unshared
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:54:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C663FF.8020308@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m163p6pqkv.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> On a system with nfs mounts, if a task unshares its mount namespace,
>> a oops can occur when the system is rebooted if the task is the last
>> to unreference the nfs mount. It will try to create a rpc request
>> using utsname() which has been invalidated by free_nsproxy().
>>
>> The patch fixes the issue by using the global init_utsname() but at
>> the same time, it breaks the capability of identifying rpc clients
>> per uts namespace.
>>
>> Any better suggestions ?
>
> Can we push utsname into rpc_create_args and push the access
> of utsname up the food chain?
struct rpc_create_args seems to be used only as a stack argument
for rpc_create() it's not kept in any nfs or sunrpc objects.
> My gut feeling says we should capture the utsname or the
> uts_ns when we mount the nfs filesystem so we stay in sync
> for the life of the mount.
I see. It make sense but, looking at the code, the nfs and sunrpc
will need some heavy changes ...
Thanks,
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-09 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-08 13:39 [RFC][PATCH] sunrpc: fix oops in rpc_create() when the mount namespace is unshared Cedric Le Goater
2008-09-08 15:19 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-08 15:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-08 15:37 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-09-08 15:43 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-08 16:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-09 11:54 ` Cedric Le Goater [this message]
2008-09-09 12:43 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-09 15:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-09 15:29 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-09 15:40 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-09-09 17:07 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-09 18:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-09 19:00 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-09 20:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-10 9:23 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-09-10 15:12 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-10 20:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-10 20:54 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-11 9:02 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-09-11 10:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-11 16:39 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C663FF.8020308@fr.ibm.com \
--to=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox