public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag for IO mappings
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:48:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C69AB6.20500@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C4EC54D0.26EEA%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>

Keir Fraser wrote:
> That's basically what our _PAGE_IO flag (in our old Linux patchset) means.
> We use it to cause pte_pfn() to return an invalid pfn and hence avoid
> reference counting that way. Since kernel mappings are never reference
> counted (I think?) perhaps we could use _PAGE_SPECIAL even if it is
> restricted to use on user mappings.

Well, _PAGE_IOMAP's most important semantic from Xen's perspective is
that the frame number is considered to already be an MFN and so isn't
converted.  It may be that _PAGE_SPECIAL is also useful for its "no
refcount" properties, but we could set both in that case.

At present we can't set _PAGE_SPECIAL on kernel mappings because we
assume its usermode only, and its shared with _PAGE_CPA_TEST which is
kernel-only.  Most _PAGE_IOMAP mappings are in kernel space, but I
wouldn't discount user mappings if we end up allowing direct access to
passthrough devices.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-09 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-07 22:21 [PATCH 0 of 7] x86: lay groundwork for Xen domain 0 support Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag for IO mappings Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 13:32   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 14:47     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 14:56       ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 15:29         ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2008-09-09 15:48           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-09-09 16:05             ` Keir Fraser
2008-09-10  9:55         ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-10 16:38           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 16:55             ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 17:27               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 2 of 7] x86: remove duplicate early_ioremap declarations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 3 of 7] x86: add early_memremap() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 4 of 7] x86: use early_memremap() in setup.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 5 of 7] x86-64: don't check for map replacement Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: use early_ioremap in __acpi_map_table Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 23:44   ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08  0:03     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 14:26       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 16:29         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 19:41         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 11:55         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 16:49           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-11  7:33             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 18:36               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-11 18:56                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 20:34             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-11 21:07               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-12  9:49                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-12 17:31                   ` Yinghai Lu
     [not found]             ` <20080911125748.GA14698@elte.hu>
2008-09-11 21:33               ` [PATCH] acpi: remove final __acpi_map_table mapping before setting acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 7 of 7] x86: always explicitly map acpi memory Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 23:35   ` [Xen-devel] " Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08  0:02     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08  0:14       ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48C69AB6.20500@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox