From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag for IO mappings
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:38:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C7F80C.6000807@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C7998D.1030408@qumranet.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Actually it's more of a "no struct page" flag, which implies no
> refcounting.
Hm, is that actually true enough to define it? Could we rename it
something like _PAGE_NOSTRUCTPAGE or something a bit more specific than
"special"?
> And not having a struct page should correspond well to a pte not
> requiring pfn->mfn conversion and being an I/O page.
But _PAGE_SPECIAL is only set in a few places. It's not set in ioremap
mappings and so on. Should it be?
There's also the hiccup that it gets set in a pte with pte_mkspecial() -
but at that point its too late because you've already constructed the
pte and done the pfn->mfn conversion. _PAGE_IOMAP can only be set when
you initially construct the pte out of a frame number and a pgprot.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-07 22:21 [PATCH 0 of 7] x86: lay groundwork for Xen domain 0 support Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag for IO mappings Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 13:32 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 14:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 14:56 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 15:29 ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2008-09-09 15:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 16:05 ` Keir Fraser
2008-09-10 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-10 16:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-09-10 16:55 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 17:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 2 of 7] x86: remove duplicate early_ioremap declarations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 3 of 7] x86: add early_memremap() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 4 of 7] x86: use early_memremap() in setup.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 5 of 7] x86-64: don't check for map replacement Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: use early_ioremap in __acpi_map_table Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 23:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08 0:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 14:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 16:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 19:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 16:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-11 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 18:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-11 18:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 20:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-11 21:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-12 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-12 17:31 ` Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <20080911125748.GA14698@elte.hu>
2008-09-11 21:33 ` [PATCH] acpi: remove final __acpi_map_table mapping before setting acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 7 of 7] x86: always explicitly map acpi memory Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 23:35 ` [Xen-devel] " Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08 0:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 0:14 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C7F80C.6000807@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox