public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: ego@in.ibm.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix __load_balance_iterator() for cfq with only one	task
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:52:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48CA9059.1020209@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080905123004.GD6238@in.ibm.com>

Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> sched: Fix __load_balance_iterator() for cfq with only one task.
> 
> From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
> 
> The __load_balance_iterator() returns a NULL when there's only one
> sched_entity which is a task. It is caused by the following code-path.
> 
> 
> 	/* Skip over entities that are not tasks */
> 	do {
> 		se = list_entry(next, struct sched_entity, group_node);
> 		next = next->next;
> 	} while (next != &cfs_rq->tasks && !entity_is_task(se));
> 
> 	if (next == &cfs_rq->tasks)
> 		return NULL;
> 	^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>       This will return NULL even when se is a task.

Thank you!  I'd been looking suspiciously at this routine as well due to 
strange load-balancing behaviour that I saw while testing the fair group 
code, but I hadn't yet tracked down the exact problem.

Peter/Ingo, this appears to explain the issues described in the mail I 
sent on the 4th.  After applying this change the imbalance between tasks 
in the same group is substantially reduced.

Chris

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-12 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-05 12:30 [PATCH] sched: Fix __load_balance_iterator() for cfq with only one task Gautham R Shenoy
2008-09-05 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-05 17:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-12  6:35     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-09-12  6:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-12  7:05       ` Mike Galbraith
2008-09-12 10:57       ` Mike Galbraith
2008-09-12 11:07         ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-09-12 15:52 ` Chris Friesen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48CA9059.1020209@nortel.com \
    --to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox