* 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26
@ 2008-09-12 18:59 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-12 18:59 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (48 more replies)
0 siblings, 49 replies; 134+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2008-09-12 163 51 38
2008-09-07 150 43 33
2008-08-30 135 48 36
2008-08-23 122 48 40
2008-08-16 103 47 37
2008-08-10 80 52 31
2008-08-02 47 31 20
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11559
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6: nohz + s2ram = need to press keys to get progress
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Date : 2008-09-12 8:31 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122121384705262&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11557
Subject : Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Date : 2008-09-08 15:10 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088987319698&w=4
Handled-By : Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11554
Subject : Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27
Submitter : Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
Date : 2008-09-12 16:56 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122123862519434&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553
Subject : Strange looking line from "ps aux"
Submitter : Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Date : 2008-09-11 17:43 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122115506018275&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11552
Subject : Disabling IRQ #23
Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-09 19:08 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098735230906&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107367715361&w=4
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11551
Subject : Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6
Submitter : Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>
Date : 2008-09-10 18:07 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107007407994&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11548
Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373!
Submitter : Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-09-08 14:26 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088566310440&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516
Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506
Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5)
Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11501
Subject : Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw
Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 18:34 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055342419068&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500
Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux
Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11485
Subject : 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression?
Submitter : Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de>
Date : 2008-08-31 17:18 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122020367015025&w=4
Handled-By : Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11471
Subject : GPE storm detected, kernel freezes
Submitter : George Gibbs <Vash63@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-31 22:00 (13 days old)
Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
Subject : Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122012238925775&w=4
Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11463
Subject : sshd hangs on close
Submitter : Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>
Date : 2008-08-30 9:18 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122008800512864&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
Subject : kernel crash after wifi connection established
Submitter : Alexey Kuznetsov <ak@axet.ru>
Date : 2008-08-30 03:08 (14 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (23 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (23 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398
Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:17 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11357
Subject : Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick
Submitter : uwe <kender@freenet.de>
Date : 2008-08-16 14:17 (28 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11343
Subject : SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i
Submitter : Manny Maxwell <mannymax@mannymax.net>
Date : 2008-08-14 4:16 (30 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121868782917600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (31 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335
Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (32 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (39 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (39 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (37 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230
Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs
Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (43 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject : Screen stays black after resume
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (44 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (44 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject : libata badness
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (44 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (44 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11556
Subject : e100: PCI wake-up handling rework causes "Error clearing wake event"
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2008-09-09 6:12 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122094080712131&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122096638020191&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
Subject : rmmod ide-cd_mod: tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
Submitter : Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Date : 2008-07-16 2:22 (59 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=122061839713526&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095622602315&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098498125536&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549
Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup
Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4
Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098180019264&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11547
Subject : build issue #565 for v2.6.27-rc5 : undefined reference to `ei_interrupt' in hp-plus.c
Submitter : Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Date : 2008-09-07 13:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122079361508022&w=4
Handled-By : Randy.Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122038632306156&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507
Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg09735.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4
Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439
Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings
Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael@numericable.fr>
Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4
Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382
Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4
Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=122038324200305&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358
Subject : net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path
Submitter : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-17 3:30 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11336
Subject : 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs
Submitter : Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com>
Date : 2008-08-12 12:37 (32 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121854484015909&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17622
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11276
Subject : build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-08-06 17:18 (38 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121804329014332&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/353
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/364
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237
Subject : corrupt PMD after resume
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread* [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 18:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki ` (47 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dhaval Giani, Miao Xie, Peter Zijlstra, Zhang, Yanmin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 18:59 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki ` (46 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Peter Zijlstra, Zdenek Kabelac This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11210] libata badness 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 18:59 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki ` (45 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kumar Gala This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD " Rafael J. Wysocki ` (44 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nico Schottelius This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki ` (43 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Hugh Dickins, Ingo Molnar, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, Jeremy Fitzhardinge This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Subject : corrupt PMD after resume Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (42 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD " Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki ` (42 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Josh Boyer This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (42 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine. 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Rafael J. Wysocki ` (41 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Jones This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (43 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 20:46 ` Randy Dunlap 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (40 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Ingo Molnar, Randy Dunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11276 Subject : build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-06 17:18 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121804329014332&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/353 Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/364 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 20:46 ` Randy Dunlap 2008-09-12 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2008-09-12 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Ingo Molnar Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11276 > Subject : build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > Date : 2008-08-06 17:18 (38 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121804329014332&w=4 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/353 > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/364 Yes, I still see this build error. What would it take to have Bjorn's patch merged into mainline? -- ~Randy Linux Plumbers Conference, 17-19 September 2008, Portland, Oregon USA http://linuxplumbersconf.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things 2008-09-12 20:46 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2008-09-12 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-17 14:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton On Friday, 12 of September 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11276 > > Subject : build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things > > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > > Date : 2008-08-06 17:18 (38 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121804329014332&w=4 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/353 > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/364 > > Yes, I still see this build error. > What would it take to have Bjorn's patch merged into mainline? Well, send a request to Andrew I think (with the patch appended). Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things 2008-09-12 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-17 14:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2008-09-17 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki, David Miller Cc: Randy Dunlap, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton On Friday 12 September 2008 03:19:17 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 12 of September 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11276 > > > Subject : build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things > > > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > > > Date : 2008-08-06 17:18 (38 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121804329014332&w=4 > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/353 > > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/22/364 Thanks for pointing out the fix that should have been obvious, Dave. That's a much better solution than sprinkling #ifdef CONFIG_PNP through drivers. Rafael, in case you missed the checkin, it's commit ef3d7714f6b75b51825ad0384b5ce48358427e50 Bjorn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 8:47 ` Jaswinder Singh 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francois Romieu, Jaswinder Singh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (39 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-13 8:47 ` Jaswinder Singh 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Jaswinder Singh @ 2008-09-13 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Francois Romieu, Jeff Garzik, davem, netdev Hello all, On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 > Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 > Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> > Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (39 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 I am sorry for delay. Now I am testing for same problem with 2.6.27-rc6.: 1. On different MYSON Technology Inc SURECOM EP-320X-S 100/10M Ethernet PCI Adapters 2. On different Linux PCs 3. With different Ethernet switches which supports 100 Mb 4. With different CAT 5 ethernet cables which supports 100 Mb 5. Also checking old patches on fealnx as per Jeff. And it seems, I am getting following error, with few ethernet switches and cables and when I switch ethernet cables : "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (fealnx): transmit timed out eth0: Transmit timed out, status 00000000, resetting..." Now I am trying to confirm that problem is coming from ethernet switches and cables. I am also facing one more Issue : With same 100 Mb ethernet switch and cable my another NIC run at 100 Mb/s and full duplex but MYSON Technology Inc SURECOM EP-320X-S 100/10M runs on 10 Mb/s and half duplex. I debug fealnx it says : PHYType 1 duplex_mode : 2 line_speed : 2 crvalue : 0xe40e61 bcrvalue : 0x10 imrvalue : 0x46c flags : 0x1 So it is saying duplex_mode : 2 (full duplex) and line_speed = 2 (100M) then why I am getting 10MB half duplex ? #lspci -vv 02:02.0 Ethernet controller: MYSON Technology Inc SURECOM EP-320X-S 100/10M Ethernet PCI Adapter Subsystem: MYSON Technology Inc SURECOM EP-320X-S 100/10M Ethernet PCI Adapter Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx- Latency: 32 (8000ns min, 16000ns max), Cache Line Size: 64 bytes Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 17 Region 0: I/O ports at b800 [size=256] Region 1: Memory at ff9ffc00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] Expansion ROM at 50000000 [disabled] [size=64K] Capabilities: [88] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2- AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0-,D1+,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- Kernel driver in use: fealnx #/sbin/ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: Not reported Advertised auto-negotiation: No Speed: 10Mb/s Duplex: Half Port: MII PHYAD: 32 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: off Current message level: 0x00000000 (0) Link detected: no Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (38 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jean-Luc Coulon This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (37 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-16 15:25 ` Jaswinder Singh 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki ` (37 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jaswinder Singh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (39 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-16 15:25 ` Jaswinder Singh 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Jaswinder Singh @ 2008-09-16 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, linux-serial Hello all, I am sorry for delay. On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 > Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 > Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> > Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (39 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 > I have tested parport_pc and also tried with pcmcia_cs, only thing I get is disappointment. So I give up :-( Now I switched to usbserial. usbserial drivers are working great !! Now I do not want to use parport_pc and pcmcia_cs atleast for 2 years, I hope in 2 years this will be solved ;) In the mean time, If you think my problem is solved just ping to me I will test and let you know the results. Thank you for all your support and help. Jaswinder Singh. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11336] 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Rafael J. Wysocki ` (36 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (31 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11336] 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (35 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Thomas Gleixner, Torsten Kaiser This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11336 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Submitter : Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> Date : 2008-08-12 12:37 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121854484015909&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17622 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11336] 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 22:05 ` Christoph Lameter 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Lameter This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 22:05 ` Christoph Lameter 2008-09-13 11:44 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-09-12 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 > Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 > Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> > Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (33 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 > > > tbench 2.6.27-rc6 2760 MB/sec 2.6.22 3235.47 MB/sec diff on the .config files for each (took .22 config and did a make oldconfig) --- /boot/config-2.6.22.1-4U4JUMP1.12 2008-01-22 08:06:38.000000000 -0600 +++ .config 2008-09-12 16:33:52.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,55 +1,89 @@ # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit -# Linux kernel version: 2.6.22.1-4U4JUMP1.12 -# Mon Jan 21 16:05:52 2008 +# Linux kernel version: 2.6.27-rc6 +# Fri Sep 12 16:33:52 2008 # +# CONFIG_64BIT is not set CONFIG_X86_32=y +# CONFIG_X86_64 is not set +CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig" +# CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is not set CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST=y CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y -CONFIG_SEMAPHORE_SLEEPERS=y -CONFIG_X86=y +CONFIG_HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT=y +CONFIG_FAST_CMPXCHG_LOCAL=y CONFIG_MMU=y CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=y -CONFIG_QUICKLIST=y CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG=y CONFIG_GENERIC_HWEIGHT=y +# CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO is not set CONFIG_ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC=y -CONFIG_DMI=y +# CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK is not set +CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y +# CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U32 is not set +# CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U64 is not set +CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_IDLE_WAIT=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY=y +# CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL is not set +CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX=y +CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CACHE_LINE_SIZE=y +CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA=y +# CONFIG_HAVE_CPUMASK_OF_CPU_MAP is not set +CONFIG_ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE=y +CONFIG_ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE=y +# CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is not set +CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP=y +# CONFIG_AUDIT_ARCH is not set +CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT=y +CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ=y +CONFIG_X86_SMP=y +CONFIG_X86_32_SMP=y +CONFIG_X86_HT=y +CONFIG_X86_BIOS_REBOOT=y +CONFIG_X86_TRAMPOLINE=y +CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR=y CONFIG_DEFCONFIG_LIST="/lib/modules/$UNAME_RELEASE/.config" # -# Code maturity level options +# General setup # CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32 - -# -# General setup -# CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="" CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO=y CONFIG_SWAP=y CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y -# CONFIG_IPC_NS is not set CONFIG_SYSVIPC_SYSCTL=y CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y # CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT is not set # CONFIG_TASKSTATS is not set -# CONFIG_UTS_NS is not set # CONFIG_AUDIT is not set CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=18 -# CONFIG_CPUSETS is not set +# CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set +CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK=y +# CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED is not set CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y +CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y # CONFIG_RELAY is not set +CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y +# CONFIG_UTS_NS is not set +# CONFIG_IPC_NS is not set +# CONFIG_USER_NS is not set +# CONFIG_PID_NS is not set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE="" CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y @@ -64,6 +98,8 @@ CONFIG_PRINTK=y CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_ELF_CORE=y +CONFIG_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y +CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK=y CONFIG_BASE_FULL=y CONFIG_FUTEX=y CONFIG_ANON_INODES=y @@ -76,28 +112,40 @@ CONFIG_SLAB=y # CONFIG_SLUB is not set # CONFIG_SLOB is not set +CONFIG_PROFILING=y +# CONFIG_MARKERS is not set +CONFIG_OPROFILE=y +CONFIG_HAVE_OPROFILE=y +CONFIG_KPROBES=y +CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y +CONFIG_KRETPROBES=y +CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT=y +CONFIG_HAVE_KPROBES=y +CONFIG_HAVE_KRETPROBES=y +# CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK is not set +# CONFIG_HAVE_DMA_ATTRS is not set +CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS=y +# CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not set +CONFIG_PROC_PAGE_MONITOR=y +CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT=y +CONFIG_SLABINFO=y CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=y # CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set CONFIG_BASE_SMALL=0 - -# -# Loadable module support -# CONFIG_MODULES=y +# CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_LOAD is not set CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD=y # CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL is not set -# CONFIG_KMOD is not set +CONFIG_KMOD=y CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE=y - -# -# Block layer -# CONFIG_BLOCK=y CONFIG_LBD=y # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE is not set # CONFIG_LSF is not set +# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set +# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY is not set # # IO Schedulers @@ -111,6 +159,7 @@ # CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_NOOP is not set CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="anticipatory" +CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y # # Processor type and features @@ -118,17 +167,23 @@ CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y CONFIG_NO_HZ=y CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BUILD=y CONFIG_SMP=y +CONFIG_X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG=y +CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE=y # CONFIG_X86_PC is not set # CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set # CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER is not set +CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH=y # CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ is not set # CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT is not set -# CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP is not set -# CONFIG_X86_VISWS is not set -CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH=y # CONFIG_X86_ES7000 is not set -# CONFIG_PARAVIRT is not set +# CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP is not set +# CONFIG_X86_VSMP is not set +# CONFIG_X86_RDC321X is not set +CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER=y +# CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST is not set +# CONFIG_MEMTEST is not set CONFIG_X86_CYCLONE_TIMER=y # CONFIG_M386 is not set # CONFIG_M486 is not set @@ -139,7 +194,6 @@ # CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set -CONFIG_MCORE2=y # CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set # CONFIG_MK6 is not set # CONFIG_MK7 is not set @@ -154,33 +208,34 @@ # CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC7 is not set +# CONFIG_MPSC is not set +CONFIG_MCORE2=y +# CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU is not set CONFIG_X86_GENERIC=y +CONFIG_X86_CPU=y CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-12 22:05 ` Christoph Lameter @ 2008-09-13 11:44 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-13 11:57 ` Mike Galbraith ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-13 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 17:05 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 > > Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 > > Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> > > Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (33 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 > > > > > > > > tbench > > 2.6.27-rc6 2760 MB/sec > 2.6.22 3235.47 MB/sec Numbers from my Q6600 Aldi supermarket box (hm, your box is from different shelf) tbench -t 60 4 localhost followed by 4 60s netperf TCP_RR pairs, each pair jabbering on a separate port and affine to a separate CPU. Configs are as close as I can make them, all kernels built and tested today by identical userland. 2.6.22.19 Throughput 1136.02 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 94179.12 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 88780.61 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 91057.72 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 94242.16 2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1 (identical config) Throughput 1126.79 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 88809.14 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 89971.25 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 89452.91 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 89478.63 2.6.23.17 Throughput 1073.2 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 83635.61 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 82754.36 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84594.59 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 82995.81 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 (identical config) Throughput 1145.28 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 90278.55 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 90579.31 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 89412.14 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 90270.97 2.6.24.7 Throughput 1119.28 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84092.78 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84120.68 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84076.73 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 83995.07 2.6.25.17 Throughput 1113.82 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84629.98 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84776.38 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84356.49 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84469.71 2.6.26.5 Throughput 1095.26 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84481.11 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84604.38 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 86526.84 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 84478.01 2.6.27-rc6 Throughput 1037.98 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80293.80 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80266.60 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80394.83 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 80397.27 I spent two weeks chasing various and sundry netperf numbers recently, only learning in the process that netperf is _utterly immune_ to bisection. Tbench numbers don't look promising for bisection from here. Note to quixotic self: destroy log immediately lest you be tempted. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-13 11:44 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-13 11:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-14 6:24 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-14 14:18 ` Christoph Lameter 2 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-13 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 13:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 (identical config) > Throughput 1145.28 MB/sec 4 procs > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 90278.55 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 90579.31 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 89412.14 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 90270.97 > > 2.6.24.7 > Throughput 1119.28 MB/sec 4 procs > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84092.78 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84120.68 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84076.73 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 83995.07 P.S. fwiw, scheduler difference between these two kernels is practically nill. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-13 11:44 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-13 11:57 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-14 6:24 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-14 7:02 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-14 14:18 ` Christoph Lameter 2 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-14 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 13:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > 2.6.27-rc6 > Throughput 1037.98 MB/sec 4 procs > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80293.80 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80266.60 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80394.83 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 80397.27 <snip... sigh> goes back to current real .27 config Throughput 1022.52 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 75941.95 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 76002.46 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 76367.55 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 76188.66 ... demodularizes seriously over-configured network Throughput 750.175 MB/sec 4 procs 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 49270.35 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 49233.86 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 49265.72 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 49227.00 Very un-good thing to try. Stupid thing too? -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-14 6:24 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-14 7:02 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-14 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 08:24 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 13:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > 2.6.27-rc6 > > Throughput 1037.98 MB/sec 4 procs > > > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80293.80 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80266.60 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 80394.83 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 80397.27 > > <snip... sigh> > > goes back to current real .27 config > > Throughput 1022.52 MB/sec 4 procs > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 75941.95 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 76002.46 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 76367.55 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 76188.66 > > ... > > demodularizes seriously over-configured network > > Throughput 750.175 MB/sec 4 procs > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 49270.35 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 49233.86 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 49265.72 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 49227.00 > > Very un-good thing to try. Stupid thing too? Apparently stupid for netfilter. Uninteresting to this thread I suppose, so disregard. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-13 11:44 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-13 11:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-14 6:24 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-14 14:18 ` Christoph Lameter 2008-09-14 19:51 ` Mike Galbraith 2 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-09-14 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Mike Galbraith wrote: > Numbers from my Q6600 Aldi supermarket box (hm, your box is from different shelf) > My box is an 8p with recent quad core processors. 8G, 32bit Linux. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-14 14:18 ` Christoph Lameter @ 2008-09-14 19:51 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-15 10:44 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-14 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 09:18 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Numbers from my Q6600 Aldi supermarket box (hm, your box is from different shelf) > > > My box is an 8p with recent quad core processors. 8G, 32bit Linux. Don't hold your breath, but after putting my network config of a very severe diet, I'm starting to see something resembling sensible results. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-14 19:51 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-15 10:44 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-16 12:28 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-15 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 21:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 09:18 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Numbers from my Q6600 Aldi supermarket box (hm, your box is from different shelf) > > > > > My box is an 8p with recent quad core processors. 8G, 32bit Linux. > > Don't hold your breath, but after putting my network config of a very > severe diet, I'm starting to see something resembling sensible results. Turns off all netfilter options except tables, etc. Since 2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1 and 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 schedulers are identical, and these are essentially identical with 2.6.24.7, what I read from numbers below is that cfs in 2.6.23 was somewhat less than wonderful for either netperf or tbench, Something happened somewhere other than the scheduler at 23->24 which cost us some performance, and another something happened at 26->27. I'll likely go looking again.. and likely regret it again ;-) Math ain't free is part of it, though apparently not much. For me, tbench regression 22->27 is ~10%, and netperf regression is ~16%. Data: 2.6.22.19 Throughput 1250.73 MB/sec 4 procs 1.00 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 111272.55 1.00 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 104689.58 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 110733.05 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 110748.88 2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1 Throughput 1204.14 MB/sec 4 procs .962 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 101799.85 .929 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 101659.41 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 101628.78 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 101700.53 wakeup granularity = 0 (make scheduler as preempt happy as 2.6.22 is) Throughput 1213.21 MB/sec 4 procs .970 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 108569.27 .992 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 108541.04 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 108579.63 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 108519.09 2.6.23.17 Throughput 1192.49 MB/sec 4 procs .953 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 91124.67 .866 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 93124.38 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 92249.69 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 91103.12 wakeup granularity = 0 Throughput 1200.46 MB/sec 4 procs .959 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 95987.66 .866 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 92819.98 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 95454.00 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 94834.84 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 Throughput 1242.47 MB/sec 4 procs .993 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 101728.34 .931 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 101930.23 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 101803.15 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 101908.29 wakeup granularity = 0 Throughput 1238.68 MB/sec 4 procs .990 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 105871.52 .969 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 105813.11 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 106106.31 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 106310.20 2.6.24.7 Throughput 1202.49 MB/sec 4 procs .961 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94643.23 .868 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94754.37 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94909.77 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95457.41 wakeup granularity = 0 Throughput 1204 MB/sec 4 procs .962 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99599.27 .910 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99439.95 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99556.38 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99500.45 2.6.25.17 Throughput 1220.47 MB/sec 4 procs .975 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94641.06 .867 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94864.87 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 95033.81 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94863.49 wakeup granularity = 0 Throughput 1223.16 MB/sec 4 procs .977 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 101768.95 .930 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 101888.46 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 101608.21 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 101833.05 2.6.26.5 Throughput 1182.24 MB/sec 4 procs .945 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 93814.75 .854 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94173.41 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 92925.24 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 93002.51 wakeup granularity = 0 Throughput 1183.47 MB/sec 4 procs .945 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 100837.12 .922 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 101230.12 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 100868.45 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 100491.41 2.6.27 Throughput 1088.17 MB/sec 4 procs .870 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84225.59 .766 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 83362.65 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84060.73 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 83462.72 wakeup granularity = 0 Throughput 1116.22 MB/sec 4 procs .892 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 92502.44 .841 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 92213.72 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 91445.86 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 91832.84 revert sched weight/asym changes, gran = 0 Throughput 1149.16 MB/sec 4 proc .918 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94824.92 .868 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 94579.45 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 95284.94 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 95228.22 Weight/asym changes cost ~3%. Mysql+oltp agrees. Preempt happy loads lose a bit, preempt haters gain a bit. Performance shift. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-15 10:44 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-16 12:28 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-16 14:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-16 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 21:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 09:18 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Numbers from my Q6600 Aldi supermarket box (hm, your box is from different shelf) > > > > > > > My box is an 8p with recent quad core processors. 8G, 32bit Linux. > > > > Don't hold your breath, but after putting my network config of a very > > severe diet, I'm starting to see something resembling sensible results. > > Turns off all netfilter options except tables, etc. > > Since 2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1 and 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 schedulers are > identical, and these are essentially identical with 2.6.24.7, what I > read from numbers below is that cfs in 2.6.23 was somewhat less than > wonderful for either netperf or tbench, Something happened somewhere > other than the scheduler at 23->24 which cost us some performance, and > another something happened at 26->27. I'll likely go looking again.. > and likely regret it again ;-) Bisecting 26->27 yet again turned up a repeatable downturn in netperf throughput. There is no difference at this point with tbench. Bisect says first bad commit is 847106f, a security merge. Post bisection sanity checkouts say... v2.6.26-21-g2069f45 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98435.13 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 99259.90 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 99325.61 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99039.84 v2.6.26-343-g847106f 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94764.59 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94909.89 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94858.63 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94801.12 ...every time. I knew I'd regret doing this. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-16 12:28 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-16 14:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-17 4:39 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-09-16 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith; +Cc: Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 21:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Since 2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1 and 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 schedulers are > > identical, and these are essentially identical with 2.6.24.7, what I > > read from numbers below is that cfs in 2.6.23 was somewhat less than > > wonderful for either netperf or tbench, Something happened somewhere > > other than the scheduler at 23->24 which cost us some performance, and > > another something happened at 26->27. I'll likely go looking again.. > > and likely regret it again ;-) > > Bisecting 26->27 yet again turned up a repeatable downturn in netperf > throughput. There is no difference at this point with tbench. > > Bisect says first bad commit is 847106f, a security merge. Post > bisection sanity checkouts say... > > v2.6.26-21-g2069f45 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98435.13 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 99259.90 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 99325.61 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99039.84 > > v2.6.26-343-g847106f > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94764.59 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94909.89 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94858.63 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94801.12 > > ...every time. I knew I'd regret doing this. I assume that c142bda458a gave a good results as well... One additional sanity check could be to rebase security 6f0f0fd4963 on top of the c142bda458a and then see if bisection among those security commits on top yields to the the same result... Though I doubt it can change much because there was not that much relevant non-security things in the merge in question. -- i. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-16 14:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-09-17 4:39 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilpo Järvinen Cc: Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 17:07 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 21:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > > Since 2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1 and 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 schedulers are > > > identical, and these are essentially identical with 2.6.24.7, what I > > > read from numbers below is that cfs in 2.6.23 was somewhat less than > > > wonderful for either netperf or tbench, Something happened somewhere > > > other than the scheduler at 23->24 which cost us some performance, and > > > another something happened at 26->27. I'll likely go looking again.. > > > and likely regret it again ;-) > > > > Bisecting 26->27 yet again turned up a repeatable downturn in netperf > > throughput. There is no difference at this point with tbench. > > > > Bisect says first bad commit is 847106f, a security merge. Post > > bisection sanity checkouts say... > > > > v2.6.26-21-g2069f45 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98435.13 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 99259.90 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 99325.61 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99039.84 > > > > v2.6.26-343-g847106f > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94764.59 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94909.89 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94858.63 > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94801.12 > > > > ...every time. I knew I'd regret doing this. > > I assume that c142bda458a gave a good results as well... Yes, just tried it. > One additional sanity check could be to rebase security 6f0f0fd4963 on top > of the c142bda458a and then see if bisection among those security commits > on top yields to the the same result... Though I doubt it can change much > because there was not that much relevant non-security things in the merge > in question. I'm not a master of git-foo, so that is not an option. However, a dinky bisection c142bda4..847106f very clearly says... marge:..kernel/linux-2.6.27.git # git bisect bad 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d is first bad commit commit 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d Author: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Date: Thu Jul 10 17:02:07 2008 +0900 security: remove register_security hook The register security hook is no longer required, as the capability module is always registered. LSMs wishing to stack capability as a secondary module should do so explicitly. Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> :040000 040000 0177ef46d305e51e27bfcc4350a40577f8ba8d3d 64b64c10a424df4539653a8ee34f1a2329300931 M include :040000 040000 e318891e514de674fd064f6bfad70d5633b1aff1 0dbb38d5aa7fc3e4b2e09dc65796ce7cd5faeb26 M security git bisect start # good: [c142bda458a9c81097238800e1bd8eeeea09913d] Merge branch 'drm-reorg' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6 git bisect good c142bda458a9c81097238800e1bd8eeeea09913d # bad: [847106ff628805e1a0aa91e7f53381f3fdfcd839] Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6 git bisect bad 847106ff628805e1a0aa91e7f53381f3fdfcd839 # good: [cea78dc4ca044e9666e8f5d797ec50ab85253e49] SELinux: fix off by 1 reference of class_to_string in context_struct_compute_av git bisect good cea78dc4ca044e9666e8f5d797ec50ab85253e49 # good: [65fc7668006b537f7ae8451990c0ed9ec882544e] security: fix return of void-valued expressions git bisect good 65fc7668006b537f7ae8451990c0ed9ec882544e # good: [b478a9f9889c81e88077d1495daadee64c0af541] security: remove unused sb_get_mnt_opts hook git bisect good b478a9f9889c81e88077d1495daadee64c0af541 # good: [93cbace7a058bce7f99319ef6ceff4b78cf45051] security: remove dummy module fix git bisect good 93cbace7a058bce7f99319ef6ceff4b78cf45051 # bad: [6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d] security: remove register_security hook git bisect bad 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 4:39 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 10:40 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilpo Järvinen Cc: Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:40 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 17:07 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > One additional sanity check could be to rebase security 6f0f0fd4963 on top > > of the c142bda458a and then see if bisection among those security commits > > on top yields to the the same result... Though I doubt it can change much > > because there was not that much relevant non-security things in the merge > > in question. > > I'm not a master of git-foo, so that is not an option. However, a dinky > bisection c142bda4..847106f very clearly says... > > marge:..kernel/linux-2.6.27.git # git bisect bad > 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d is first bad commit > commit 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d > Author: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> > Date: Thu Jul 10 17:02:07 2008 +0900 > > security: remove register_security hook > > The register security hook is no longer required, as the capability > module is always registered. LSMs wishing to stack capability as > a secondary module should do so explicitly. > > Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> > Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > > :040000 040000 0177ef46d305e51e27bfcc4350a40577f8ba8d3d 64b64c10a424df4539653a8ee34f1a2329300931 M include > :040000 040000 e318891e514de674fd064f6bfad70d5633b1aff1 0dbb38d5aa7fc3e4b2e09dc65796ce7cd5faeb26 M security Which is high grade horse-pookey. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 10:40 ` Ingo Molnar 2008-09-17 11:41 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-09-17 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ilpo Järvinen, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:40 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 17:07 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > > > One additional sanity check could be to rebase security 6f0f0fd4963 on top > > > of the c142bda458a and then see if bisection among those security commits > > > on top yields to the the same result... Though I doubt it can change much > > > because there was not that much relevant non-security things in the merge > > > in question. > > > > I'm not a master of git-foo, so that is not an option. However, a dinky > > bisection c142bda4..847106f very clearly says... > > > > marge:..kernel/linux-2.6.27.git # git bisect bad > > 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d is first bad commit > > commit 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d > > Author: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> > > Date: Thu Jul 10 17:02:07 2008 +0900 > > > > security: remove register_security hook > > > > The register security hook is no longer required, as the capability > > module is always registered. LSMs wishing to stack capability as > > a secondary module should do so explicitly. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> > > Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > > > > :040000 040000 0177ef46d305e51e27bfcc4350a40577f8ba8d3d 64b64c10a424df4539653a8ee34f1a2329300931 M include > > :040000 040000 e318891e514de674fd064f6bfad70d5633b1aff1 0dbb38d5aa7fc3e4b2e09dc65796ce7cd5faeb26 M security > > Which is high grade horse-pookey. perhaps re-test commit 6f0f0fd49 and its parent commit, 93cbace7a0. It looks like a potentially bogus bisection result, but _maybe_ it has relevance: changes the size of "struct security_operations", which could have alignment and layout effects on all sorts of kernel variables, kmalloc sizes, etc. Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 10:40 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2008-09-17 11:41 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ilpo Järvinen, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 12:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:40 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 17:07 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > > > > > One additional sanity check could be to rebase security 6f0f0fd4963 on top > > > > of the c142bda458a and then see if bisection among those security commits > > > > on top yields to the the same result... Though I doubt it can change much > > > > because there was not that much relevant non-security things in the merge > > > > in question. > > > > > > I'm not a master of git-foo, so that is not an option. However, a dinky > > > bisection c142bda4..847106f very clearly says... > > > > > > marge:..kernel/linux-2.6.27.git # git bisect bad > > > 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d is first bad commit > > > commit 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d > > > Author: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> > > > Date: Thu Jul 10 17:02:07 2008 +0900 > > > > > > security: remove register_security hook > > > > > > The register security hook is no longer required, as the capability > > > module is always registered. LSMs wishing to stack capability as > > > a secondary module should do so explicitly. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> > > > Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > > > > > > :040000 040000 0177ef46d305e51e27bfcc4350a40577f8ba8d3d 64b64c10a424df4539653a8ee34f1a2329300931 M include > > > :040000 040000 e318891e514de674fd064f6bfad70d5633b1aff1 0dbb38d5aa7fc3e4b2e09dc65796ce7cd5faeb26 M security > > > > Which is high grade horse-pookey. > > perhaps re-test commit 6f0f0fd49 and its parent commit, 93cbace7a0. Will do. > It looks like a potentially bogus bisection result, but _maybe_ it has > relevance: changes the size of "struct security_operations", which could > have alignment and layout effects on all sorts of kernel variables, > kmalloc sizes, etc. This may well be a mythical creature infestation for all I know ;-), but it's address is somewhere in the 2069f45..847106f block, 316 commits, none of which look like they should be the least bit interesting to netperf. I reverted this particular commit in 27.git, got the expected result. Looks like I'll keep poking at it, can't seem to resist. Grr. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 11:41 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar 2008-09-17 13:11 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-09-17 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ilpo Järvinen, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > > It looks like a potentially bogus bisection result, but _maybe_ it > > has relevance: changes the size of "struct security_operations", > > which could have alignment and layout effects on all sorts of kernel > > variables, kmalloc sizes, etc. > > This may well be a mythical creature infestation for all I know ;-), > but it's address is somewhere in the 2069f45..847106f block, 316 > commits, none of which look like they should be the least bit > interesting to netperf. I reverted this particular commit in 27.git, > got the expected result. Looks like I'll keep poking at it, can't > seem to resist. Grr. are you sure it's 2069f45..847106f? Filtering out the likely-uninteresting commits: git log --pretty=format:"%h: %s" 2069f45..847106f | grep -viE \ 'block|alsa|pcmcia|sound|Merge|iosched|blk|DAC960|scsi|s390|paride|pktcdvd|filter|cdrom|drm' gives us: 7daf705: Start using the new '%pS' infrastructure to print symbols 6f0f0fd: security: remove register_security hook 93cbace: security: remove dummy module fix 5915eb5: security: remove dummy module b478a9f: security: remove unused sb_get_mnt_opts hook 32502b8: splice: fix generic_file_splice_read() race with page invalidation 8b3d356: ramfs: enable splice write a144ff0: xen: Avoid allocations causing swap activity on the resume path which really only leaves that security commit your bisection fingered. Which _slightly_ raises its likelyhood of being implicated. Structure size changes can move two formerly far-apart netperf-relevant symbols on the same cacheline, which can start cache ping-pong-ing badly. It wouldnt be the first such incident - alignment changes impacting macro benchmarks. (and it's hard to find it as the thing that changes alignment/size/sharedness might be something totally unrelated) It's still a bit too early to say this for sure though ... Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2008-09-17 13:11 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 13:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-17 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 2 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ilpo Järvinen, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > It looks like a potentially bogus bisection result, but _maybe_ it > > > has relevance: changes the size of "struct security_operations", > > > which could have alignment and layout effects on all sorts of kernel > > > variables, kmalloc sizes, etc. > > > > This may well be a mythical creature infestation for all I know ;-), > > but it's address is somewhere in the 2069f45..847106f block, 316 > > commits, none of which look like they should be the least bit > > interesting to netperf. I reverted this particular commit in 27.git, > > got the expected result. Looks like I'll keep poking at it, can't > > seem to resist. Grr. > > are you sure it's 2069f45..847106f? Filtering out the > likely-uninteresting commits: Yeah, as sure as I can be. I've built both (et al) kernels several times, and it has repeated every time. Would be nice if someone would try to confirm/deny though. For my little quad, I do.. #!/bin/sh echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_wakeup_granularity_ns netserver -p 12865 netserver -p 12866 netserver -p 12867 netserver -p 12868 netperf -p 12865 -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 0,0 -- -r 1,1& netperf -p 12866 -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 1,1 -- -r 1,1& netperf -p 12867 -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 2,2 -- -r 1,1& netperf -p 12868 -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 3,3 -- -r 1,1& wait killall netserver > git log --pretty=format:"%h: %s" 2069f45..847106f | grep -viE \ > 'block|alsa|pcmcia|sound|Merge|iosched|blk|DAC960|scsi|s390|paride|pktcdvd|filter|cdrom|drm' > > gives us: > > 7daf705: Start using the new '%pS' infrastructure to print symbols > 6f0f0fd: security: remove register_security hook > 93cbace: security: remove dummy module fix > 5915eb5: security: remove dummy module > b478a9f: security: remove unused sb_get_mnt_opts hook > 32502b8: splice: fix generic_file_splice_read() race with page invalidation > 8b3d356: ramfs: enable splice write > a144ff0: xen: Avoid allocations causing swap activity on the resume path > > which really only leaves that security commit your bisection fingered. > Which _slightly_ raises its likelyhood of being implicated. Structure > size changes can move two formerly far-apart netperf-relevant symbols on > the same cacheline, which can start cache ping-pong-ing badly. I sure hope it's something like ping-pong, it's driving me NUTS. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 13:11 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 13:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-17 13:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet 1 sibling, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-09-17 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ingo Molnar, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > git log --pretty=format:"%h: %s" 2069f45..847106f | grep -viE \ > > 'block|alsa|pcmcia|sound|Merge|iosched|blk|DAC960|scsi|s390|paride|pktcdvd|filter|cdrom|drm' > > > > gives us: > > > > 7daf705: Start using the new '%pS' infrastructure to print symbols > > 6f0f0fd: security: remove register_security hook > > 93cbace: security: remove dummy module fix > > 5915eb5: security: remove dummy module > > b478a9f: security: remove unused sb_get_mnt_opts hook > > 32502b8: splice: fix generic_file_splice_read() race with page invalidation > > 8b3d356: ramfs: enable splice write > > a144ff0: xen: Avoid allocations causing swap activity on the resume path > > > > which really only leaves that security commit your bisection fingered. > > Which _slightly_ raises its likelyhood of being implicated. Structure > > size changes can move two formerly far-apart netperf-relevant symbols on > > the same cacheline, which can start cache ping-pong-ing badly. > > I sure hope it's something like ping-pong, it's driving me NUTS. How about dividing the problem to smaller blocks then by restoring parts of the change... -- i. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 13:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-09-17 13:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 17:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-18 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith 0 siblings, 2 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilpo Järvinen Cc: Ingo Molnar, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:36 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > git log --pretty=format:"%h: %s" 2069f45..847106f | grep -viE \ > > > 'block|alsa|pcmcia|sound|Merge|iosched|blk|DAC960|scsi|s390|paride|pktcdvd|filter|cdrom|drm' > > > > > > gives us: > > > > > > 7daf705: Start using the new '%pS' infrastructure to print symbols > > > 6f0f0fd: security: remove register_security hook > > > 93cbace: security: remove dummy module fix > > > 5915eb5: security: remove dummy module > > > b478a9f: security: remove unused sb_get_mnt_opts hook > > > 32502b8: splice: fix generic_file_splice_read() race with page invalidation > > > 8b3d356: ramfs: enable splice write > > > a144ff0: xen: Avoid allocations causing swap activity on the resume path > > > > > > which really only leaves that security commit your bisection fingered. > > > Which _slightly_ raises its likelyhood of being implicated. Structure > > > size changes can move two formerly far-apart netperf-relevant symbols on > > > the same cacheline, which can start cache ping-pong-ing badly. > > > > I sure hope it's something like ping-pong, it's driving me NUTS. > > How about dividing the problem to smaller blocks then by restoring > parts of the change... Well, what I've done is check out the "bad" tree, reverted every darn commit between there and the "good" tree, and then reverted the reverts so I have a nice merge-free line and don't have to remember to think backward. (probably sounds silly to git-foo masters) I'll try bisecting that in the a.m. and see what happens. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 13:57 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 17:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-18 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith 1 sibling, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-09-17 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ingo Molnar, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2273 bytes --] On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:36 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > git log --pretty=format:"%h: %s" 2069f45..847106f | grep -viE \ > > > > 'block|alsa|pcmcia|sound|Merge|iosched|blk|DAC960|scsi|s390|paride|pktcdvd|filter|cdrom|drm' > > > > > > > > gives us: > > > > > > > > 7daf705: Start using the new '%pS' infrastructure to print symbols > > > > 6f0f0fd: security: remove register_security hook > > > > 93cbace: security: remove dummy module fix > > > > 5915eb5: security: remove dummy module > > > > b478a9f: security: remove unused sb_get_mnt_opts hook > > > > 32502b8: splice: fix generic_file_splice_read() race with page invalidation > > > > 8b3d356: ramfs: enable splice write > > > > a144ff0: xen: Avoid allocations causing swap activity on the resume path > > > > > > > > which really only leaves that security commit your bisection fingered. > > > > Which _slightly_ raises its likelyhood of being implicated. Structure > > > > size changes can move two formerly far-apart netperf-relevant symbols on > > > > the same cacheline, which can start cache ping-pong-ing badly. > > > > > > I sure hope it's something like ping-pong, it's driving me NUTS. > > > > How about dividing the problem to smaller blocks then by restoring > > parts of the change... > > Well, what I've done is check out the "bad" tree, reverted every darn > commit between there and the "good" tree, and then reverted the reverts > so I have a nice merge-free line and don't have to remember to think > backward. (probably sounds silly to git-foo masters) I'll try > bisecting that in the a.m. and see what happens. This was my initial idea (which was mainly an error from my part as I misread some shaids and midunderstood that the first regressing would be the merge instead of the actual change), but in here I meant taking parts of the 6f0f0fd on top of 6f0f0fd^. The most easiest way to do that actually might be to do in fact the opposite, ie., but some of the datastructure/layout changes back on top of 6f0f0fd and see if the performance get restored (besides testing the Eric's patch). -- i. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 13:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 17:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-09-18 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-18 7:25 ` Mike Galbraith 1 sibling, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-18 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilpo Järvinen Cc: Ingo Molnar, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:57 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:36 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > git log --pretty=format:"%h: %s" 2069f45..847106f | grep -viE \ > > > > 'block|alsa|pcmcia|sound|Merge|iosched|blk|DAC960|scsi|s390|paride|pktcdvd|filter|cdrom|drm' > > > > > > > > gives us: > > > > > > > > 7daf705: Start using the new '%pS' infrastructure to print symbols > > > > 6f0f0fd: security: remove register_security hook > > > > 93cbace: security: remove dummy module fix > > > > 5915eb5: security: remove dummy module > > > > b478a9f: security: remove unused sb_get_mnt_opts hook > > > > 32502b8: splice: fix generic_file_splice_read() race with page invalidation > > > > 8b3d356: ramfs: enable splice write > > > > a144ff0: xen: Avoid allocations causing swap activity on the resume path > > > > > > > > which really only leaves that security commit your bisection fingered. > > > > Which _slightly_ raises its likelyhood of being implicated. Structure > > > > size changes can move two formerly far-apart netperf-relevant symbols on > > > > the same cacheline, which can start cache ping-pong-ing badly. > > > > > > I sure hope it's something like ping-pong, it's driving me NUTS. > > > > How about dividing the problem to smaller blocks then by restoring > > parts of the change... > > Well, what I've done is check out the "bad" tree, reverted every darn > commit between there and the "good" tree, and then reverted the reverts > so I have a nice merge-free line and don't have to remember to think > backward. (probably sounds silly to git-foo masters) I'll try > bisecting that in the a.m. and see what happens. It bisected to 1c9ce52. Reverting that in 27.git had the expected result, nada. Full bisection/test log below - you can jump straight to post run sanity checks. I'm torn between building a straight line tree from v2.6.26 through git.today and bisecting that sucker, or exorcising netperf from my box and swearing a sacred oath to never download the damned thing again. Nuking netperf is most attractive option. 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 is first bad commit commit 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Date: Wed Sep 17 14:55:50 2008 +0200 Revert "Revert "block: export "ro" attribute"" This reverts commit 2c8803af5c1bf41200167f29349f7f1396683a51. :040000 040000 08ca8ba7ff3f9506a5462b4122256356cae28ceb bef679485bc924ad1dc867858ebda1b68196b5a8 M block git bisect start # good: [7804ad865f7d0cd9bdc51da601772ce4d2e252ca] Revert "[ALSA] soc - tlv320aic3x - revisit clock setup" git bisect good 7804ad865f7d0cd9bdc51da601772ce4d2e252ca # bad: [2846693a63a34ac6d582dd55a7e00605b49b1cec] Revert "Revert "[S390] sclp_tty: Fix scheduling while atomic bug."" git bisect bad 2846693a63a34ac6d582dd55a7e00605b49b1cec # bad: [70477f86f63640be2dd1d8968aeb47870a5c21c6] Revert "Revert "xen/blkfront: Make sure we don't use bounce buffers, we don't need them."" git bisect bad 70477f86f63640be2dd1d8968aeb47870a5c21c6 # good: [7c6ccb520424939deff0a50f3fae621c6477dbbe] Revert "Revert "ALSA: hda - Add bdl_pos_adj option"" git bisect good 7c6ccb520424939deff0a50f3fae621c6477dbbe # good: [66036beae94f043f99044e285935486126a9c4bd] Revert "Revert "pcmcia: fix Alchemy warnings"" git bisect good 66036beae94f043f99044e285935486126a9c4bd # good: [6b7b5ef18871c8f7c15eedc6eb53270eaf8bc613] Revert "Revert "ALSA: hda - Added SSID for 'Fujitsu Siemens Amilo M1451G' laptop"" git bisect good 6b7b5ef18871c8f7c15eedc6eb53270eaf8bc613 # good: [024905ea4b2d1ab5d6b845ba84ddfc0857fb2d2a] Revert "Revert "ALSA: hda - Add MacBook 3.1 support"" git bisect good 024905ea4b2d1ab5d6b845ba84ddfc0857fb2d2a # good: [4bbe3501e06eddaa4900894efa519f1167cb8624] Revert "Revert "as-iosched: properly protect ioc_gone and ioc count"" git bisect good 4bbe3501e06eddaa4900894efa519f1167cb8624 # good: [e124683c1cd5c73c494f9ea6cee8a71e68bb70ca] Revert "Revert "Added in user-injected messages into blk traces"" git bisect good e124683c1cd5c73c494f9ea6cee8a71e68bb70ca # bad: [f148fae0bc009aa23122c5762368a1a16bb55b86] Revert "Revert "block: kill request_queue_t"" git bisect bad f148fae0bc009aa23122c5762368a1a16bb55b86 # bad: [1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55] Revert "Revert "block: export "ro" attribute"" git bisect bad 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 v2.6.26-974-g2846693 (847106f) 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94350.45 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 95857.25 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95334.84 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95052.11 v2.6.26-659-g7804ad8 (2069f45) 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98630.64 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98653.14 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99162.65 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98652.38 v2.6.26-816-g70477f8 (call it bad) 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95532.19 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 96211.39 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 96246.73 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 96286.40 v2.6.26-737-g7c6ccb5 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98478.00 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99221.33 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98930.70 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98958.73 v2.6.26-776-g66036be 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 97958.10 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 98683.80 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 98515.34 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98396.11 v2.6.26-796-g6b7b5ef 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99047.21 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98095.23 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99811.18 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98651.32 v2.6.26-806-g024905e 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98823.46 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98959.11 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98709.95 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99042.13 v2.6.26-811-g4bbe350 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98144.99 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 99023.30 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 98685.45 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 98606.18 v2.6.26-813-ge124683 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98458.18 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98163.92 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98115.62 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98633.62 v2.6.26-815-gf148fae 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95649.91 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 96292.34 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 96043.82 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 96093.81 v2.6.26-814-g1e65e84 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94906.81 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95445.05 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 94698.68 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94938.65 Post bisection checkouts ------------------------------------------------ v2.6.26-rc8-208-g02c6230 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98392.94 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98199.96 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98534.27 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98501.02 v2.6.26-rc8-209-g1c9ce52 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 97583.88 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 97326.23 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 97582.80 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 97568.63 v2.6.26-814-g1e65e84 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94856.33 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94594.03 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94751.74 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 96825.28 v2.6.26-813-ge124683 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 97550.64 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98024.28 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98486.85 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98493.41 marge:..git/linux-2.6 # git rev-list v2.6.26-813-ge124683..v2.6.26-814-g1e65e84 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 marge:..git/linux-2.6 # git show 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 commit 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Date: Wed Sep 17 14:55:50 2008 +0200 Revert "Revert "block: export "ro" attribute"" This reverts commit 2c8803af5c1bf41200167f29349f7f1396683a51. diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c index b922d48..43e468e 100644 --- a/block/genhd.c +++ b/block/genhd.c @@ -400,6 +400,14 @@ static ssize_t disk_removable_show(struct device *dev, (disk->flags & GENHD_FL_REMOVABLE ? 1 : 0)); } +static ssize_t disk_ro_show(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + struct gendisk *disk = dev_to_disk(dev); + + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", disk->policy ? 1 : 0); +} + static ssize_t disk_size_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { @@ -472,6 +480,7 @@ static ssize_t disk_fail_store(struct device *dev, static DEVICE_ATTR(range, S_IRUGO, disk_range_show, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(removable, S_IRUGO, disk_removable_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(ro, S_IRUGO, disk_ro_show, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(size, S_IRUGO, disk_size_show, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(capability, S_IRUGO, disk_capability_show, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(stat, S_IRUGO, disk_stat_show, NULL); @@ -483,6 +492,7 @@ static struct device_attribute dev_attr_fail = static struct attribute *disk_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_range.attr, &dev_attr_removable.attr, + &dev_attr_ro.attr, &dev_attr_size.attr, &dev_attr_capability.attr, &dev_attr_stat.attr, ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-18 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-18 7:25 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-18 7:58 ` Ilpo Järvinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-18 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilpo Järvinen Cc: Ingo Molnar, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 09:12 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 is first bad commit > commit 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 > Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> > Date: Wed Sep 17 14:55:50 2008 +0200 > > Revert "Revert "block: export "ro" attribute"" > > This reverts commit 2c8803af5c1bf41200167f29349f7f1396683a51. BTW, the reason it's revert revert is that I reverse bisected the revert tree yesterday, and it emitted the same darn result. I immediately said "yeah right, ya screwed up", and created the revert revert tree to make sure I couldn't fumble negation. -Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-18 7:25 ` Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-18 7:58 ` Ilpo Järvinen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-09-18 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ingo Molnar, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 09:12 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 is first bad commit > > commit 1e65e841bb5584136ed6047c55cf77532afbbb55 > > Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> > > Date: Wed Sep 17 14:55:50 2008 +0200 > > > > Revert "Revert "block: export "ro" attribute"" > > > > This reverts commit 2c8803af5c1bf41200167f29349f7f1396683a51. > > BTW, the reason it's revert revert is that I reverse bisected the revert > tree yesterday, and it emitted the same darn result. I immediately said > "yeah right, ya screwed up", and created the revert revert tree to make > sure I couldn't fumble negation. :-) gcc compiling something slightly differently would be a nice theory but it sort of breaks down now as this commit touches only one .c file... In the past when I did some static inline .h -> .c uninline sizing tests I noticed that some changes happened also in places which should have been quite much unrelated. Though all the changes were minor anyway (in the places I did look), e.g., routed the conditional paths slightly differently and added one xor clear reg. -- i. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 13:11 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 13:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen @ 2008-09-17 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet 2008-09-17 14:50 ` Eric Dumazet 2008-09-17 18:16 ` Mike Galbraith 1 sibling, 2 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2008-09-17 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ingo Molnar, Ilpo Järvinen, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers Mike Galbraith a écrit : > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: >> >>>> It looks like a potentially bogus bisection result, but _maybe_ it >>>> has relevance: changes the size of "struct security_operations", >>>> which could have alignment and layout effects on all sorts of kernel >>>> variables, kmalloc sizes, etc. >>> This may well be a mythical creature infestation for all I know ;-), >>> but it's address is somewhere in the 2069f45..847106f block, 316 >>> commits, none of which look like they should be the least bit >>> interesting to netperf. I reverted this particular commit in 27.git, >>> got the expected result. Looks like I'll keep poking at it, can't >>> seem to resist. Grr. >> are you sure it's 2069f45..847106f? Filtering out the >> likely-uninteresting commits: > > Yeah, as sure as I can be. I've built both (et al) kernels several > times, and it has repeated every time. Would be nice if someone would > try to confirm/deny though. For my little quad, I do.. > > #!/bin/sh > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_wakeup_granularity_ns > > netserver -p 12865 > netserver -p 12866 > netserver -p 12867 > netserver -p 12868 > > netperf -p 12865 -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 0,0 -- -r 1,1& > netperf -p 12866 -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 1,1 -- -r 1,1& > netperf -p 12867 -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 2,2 -- -r 1,1& > netperf -p 12868 -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 3,3 -- -r 1,1& > > wait > killall netserver > > >> git log --pretty=format:"%h: %s" 2069f45..847106f | grep -viE \ >> 'block|alsa|pcmcia|sound|Merge|iosched|blk|DAC960|scsi|s390|paride|pktcdvd|filter|cdrom|drm' >> >> gives us: >> >> 7daf705: Start using the new '%pS' infrastructure to print symbols >> 6f0f0fd: security: remove register_security hook >> 93cbace: security: remove dummy module fix >> 5915eb5: security: remove dummy module >> b478a9f: security: remove unused sb_get_mnt_opts hook >> 32502b8: splice: fix generic_file_splice_read() race with page invalidation >> 8b3d356: ramfs: enable splice write >> a144ff0: xen: Avoid allocations causing swap activity on the resume path >> >> which really only leaves that security commit your bisection fingered. >> Which _slightly_ raises its likelyhood of being implicated. Structure >> size changes can move two formerly far-apart netperf-relevant symbols on >> the same cacheline, which can start cache ping-pong-ing badly. > > I sure hope it's something like ping-pong, it's driving me NUTS. Could you please try following patch ? [PATCH] security_ops moved to read_mostly section "struct security_operations *security_ops" should be moved to read_mostly section in order to NOT let it share a cache line with higly modified variables. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index 3a4b4f5..0b13d65 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static __initdata char chosen_lsm[SECURITY_NAME_MAX + 1]; extern struct security_operations default_security_ops; extern void security_fixup_ops(struct security_operations *ops); -struct security_operations *security_ops; /* Initialized to NULL */ +struct security_operations *security_ops __read_mostly;e /* amount of vm to protect from userspace access */ unsigned long mmap_min_addr = CONFIG_SECURITY_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2008-09-17 14:50 ` Eric Dumazet 2008-09-17 18:16 ` Mike Galbraith 1 sibling, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2008-09-17 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ingo Molnar, Ilpo Järvinen, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers Eric Dumazet a écrit : > Mike Galbraith a écrit : >> I sure hope it's something like ping-pong, it's driving me NUTS. > > Could you please try following patch ? > > [PATCH] security_ops moved to read_mostly section > > "struct security_operations *security_ops" should be moved to > read_mostly section in order to NOT let it share a cache line with higly > modified variables. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> > > diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c > index 3a4b4f5..0b13d65 100644 > --- a/security/security.c > +++ b/security/security.c > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static __initdata char chosen_lsm[SECURITY_NAME_MAX + 1]; > extern struct security_operations default_security_ops; > extern void security_fixup_ops(struct security_operations *ops); > > -struct security_operations *security_ops; /* Initialized to NULL */ > +struct security_operations *security_ops __read_mostly;e Sorry for the extra 'e' at the end of this line, please remove it :) > > /* amount of vm to protect from userspace access */ > unsigned long mmap_min_addr = CONFIG_SECURITY_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR; > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-17 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet 2008-09-17 14:50 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2008-09-17 18:16 ` Mike Galbraith 1 sibling, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Mike Galbraith @ 2008-09-17 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Ingo Molnar, Ilpo Järvinen, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, LKML, kernel-testers On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 16:47 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Could you please try following patch ? > > [PATCH] security_ops moved to read_mostly section > > "struct security_operations *security_ops" should be moved to read_mostly > section in order to NOT let it share a cache line with higly modified variables. v2.6.26-974-g2846693 (tip of revert reverts tree, == 847106f) 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94350.45 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 95857.25 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95334.84 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95052.11 v2.6.26-659-g7804ad8 (first commit prior, == 2069f45) 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98630.64 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98653.14 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 99162.65 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 98652.38 v2.6.26-974-g2846693 patched 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95877.41 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95810.27 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 95530.03 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 94968.12 (poo, "it" didn't die) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11343] SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Rafael J. Wysocki ` (33 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Hugh Dickins, Randy Dunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11343] SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11358] net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Rafael J. Wysocki ` (32 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Manny Maxwell, Tejun Heo This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11343 Subject : SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Submitter : Manny Maxwell <mannymax@mannymax.net> Date : 2008-08-14 4:16 (30 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121868782917600&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11358] net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11343] SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki ` (31 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jeff Garzik, Tobias Diedrich, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358 Subject : net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Submitter : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-17 3:30 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11358] net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, uwe This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 Subject : Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Submitter : uwe <kender@freenet.de> Date : 2008-08-16 14:17 (28 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (17 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (18 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 7:37 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki ` (28 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-08-21 17:17 (23 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-13 7:37 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-13 17:23 ` Takashi Iwai 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2008-09-13 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Friday 12 September 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 > Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. > Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. Still there. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. 2008-09-13 7:37 ` Frans Pop @ 2008-09-13 17:23 ` Takashi Iwai 2008-09-15 0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Takashi Iwai @ 2008-09-13 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List At Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:37:51 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Friday 12 September 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > > know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 > > Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. > > Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. > > Still there. Yeah, the driver wasn't changed about this. Basically it's a warning message that CPU usage got higher due to somehow wrongly behaving hardware. The driver behavior itself didn't do anything wrong. That is, if the driver didn't show it, you wouldn't have noticed any change (or noticed improvements in some apps :) Of course, it would be ideal if we can add a perfect workaround for it, but right now, I have no idea what to do better. So, I don't think it's worth to keeping this open as a regression. thanks, Takashi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. 2008-09-13 17:23 ` Takashi Iwai @ 2008-09-15 0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-15 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Takashi Iwai; +Cc: Frans Pop, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:37:51 +0200, > Frans Pop wrote: > > > > On Friday 12 September 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 > > > Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. > > > Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. > > > > Still there. > > Yeah, the driver wasn't changed about this. > > Basically it's a warning message that CPU usage got higher due to > somehow wrongly behaving hardware. The driver behavior itself didn't > do anything wrong. That is, if the driver didn't show it, you > wouldn't have noticed any change (or noticed improvements in some apps > :) > > Of course, it would be ideal if we can add a perfect workaround for > it, but right now, I have no idea what to do better. So, I don't > think it's worth to keeping this open as a regression. I've closed the bug. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (19 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki ` (27 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley, Miller, Mike (OS Dev), rdunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (20 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki ` (26 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christopher Li, David Vrabel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=122038324200305&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (21 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki ` (25 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Kuznetsov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 Subject : kernel crash after wifi connection established Submitter : Alexey Kuznetsov <ak@axet.ru> Date : 2008-08-30 03:08 (14 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (22 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 20:50 ` Vegard Nossum 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki ` (24 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek, Pekka Enberg, Rafael J. Wysocki, Vegard Nossum This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 20:50 ` Vegard Nossum 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Vegard Nossum @ 2008-09-12 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek, Pekka Enberg On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 > Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request > Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> > Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (23 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> > Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> I'm sorry for not replying sooner. This is current status: Problem was never resolved. I tried to bisect, but I only ran into other problems with either config not being supported for my machine prior to certain date while trying to find a good bisection point. It's been a while now, so I don't remember everything exactly, but I may try to reproduce it tomorrow on the latest -git and see what comes up. Will report back as soon as I have more info. Thanks, Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (23 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki ` (23 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Greg KH, Rufus & Azrael This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439 Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael@numericable.fr> Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4 Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (24 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki ` (22 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Oliver Neukum, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (25 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11463] sshd hangs on close Rafael J. Wysocki ` (21 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Gene Heskett This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465 Subject : Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net> Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (14 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122012238925775&w=4 Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11463] sshd hangs on close 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (26 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Rafael J. Wysocki ` (20 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matthias Urlichs This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11463 Subject : sshd hangs on close Submitter : Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> Date : 2008-08-30 9:18 (14 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122008800512864&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (27 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11463] sshd hangs on close Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-16 5:50 ` Zhang Rui 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki ` (19 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, George Gibbs, Zhang Rui This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11471 Subject : GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Submitter : George Gibbs <Vash63@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-31 22:00 (13 days old) Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-16 5:50 ` Zhang Rui 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Zhang Rui @ 2008-09-16 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, George Gibbs On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 03:06 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > know > (either way). > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11471 > Subject : GPE storm detected, kernel freezes > Submitter : George Gibbs <Vash63@gmail.com> > Date : 2008-08-31 22:00 (13 days old) > Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> > this has already been fixed in -rc6. please refer to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11471#c22 so I think this should be removed from the list. thanks, rui ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (28 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki ` (18 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11501 Subject : Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-09-04 18:34 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055342419068&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11485] 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Rafael J. Wysocki ` (17 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dan Williams, Jouni Malinen, Michael S. Tsirkin, Zhu Yi This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11485] 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alex Nixon, Bernhard Schmidt, Jeremy Fitzhardinge This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11485 Subject : 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Submitter : Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de> Date : 2008-08-31 17:18 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122020367015025&w=4 Handled-By : Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (31 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11485] 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 22:14 ` James Morris 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 22:14 ` James Morris 2008-09-12 22:24 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: James Morris @ 2008-09-12 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Stephen Smalley On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is this seen with? - James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-12 22:14 ` James Morris @ 2008-09-12 22:24 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-13 0:15 ` James Morris 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-12 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Morris; +Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, sds On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:14:10 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > this seen with? > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-12 22:24 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-13 0:15 ` James Morris 2008-09-13 19:37 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: James Morris @ 2008-09-13 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, sds On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream kernel many, many eons ago. > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > this seen with? > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-13 0:15 ` James Morris @ 2008-09-13 19:37 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-15 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 2 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-13 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Morris; +Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, sds On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > kernel many, many eons ago. hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt The latter includes this: Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros but nobody else is reporting it? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-13 19:37 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-15 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-15 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: James Morris, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, sds On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > > kernel many, many eons ago. > > hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the > bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. > > I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad > bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. > > 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt > /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt > > The latter includes this: > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability > > > Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros > but nobody else is reporting it? Well, it seems no one else is testing selinux ... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-13 19:37 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-15 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-15 13:42 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton 1 sibling, 2 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-15 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: James Morris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 12:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > > kernel many, many eons ago. > > hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the > bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. > > I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad > bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. > > 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt > /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt > > The latter includes this: > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability > > > Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros > but nobody else is reporting it? What we actually need to see is the output of: /sbin/ausearch -i -m AVC -sv no However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, that introduced an additional permission check on accesses of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older kernels, older policies didn't allow it. As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have updated their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary access. The fact that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated policies isn't surprising - they don't push updates to those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 are both EOL'd, right? In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the messenger please. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-15 13:42 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton 1 sibling, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-15 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: James Morris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 09:05 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 12:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > > > > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > > > kernel many, many eons ago. > > > > hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the > > bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. > > > > I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad > > bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > > > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > > > > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. > > > > 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt > > /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt > > > > The latter includes this: > > > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability > > > > > > Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros > > but nobody else is reporting it? > > What we actually need to see is the output of: > /sbin/ausearch -i -m AVC -sv no > > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was > changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, > that introduced an additional permission check on accesses > of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. > And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older > kernels, older policies didn't allow it. > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have updated > their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary access. The fact > that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated policies isn't surprising > - they don't push updates to those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 > are both EOL'd, right? > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was > elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the messenger > please. BTW, if the explanation above is correct, then a user can allow this permission in their own policy by creating a local policy module and inserting it, ala: $ cat fixprocnet.te policy_module(fixprocnet, 1.0) require { attribute domain; type proc_net_t; } # Allow all domains to read the /proc/net symlink. allow domain proc_net_t:lnk_file read; $ make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile fixprocnet.pp $ /usr/sbin/semodule -i fixprocnet.pp Requires selinux-policy-devel to be installed. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-15 13:42 ` Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 21:56 ` Eric W. Biederman 1 sibling, 2 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Smalley Cc: jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, Eric W. Biederman, netdev On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 12:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > > > > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > > > > > > By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream > > > kernel many, many eons ago. > > > > hm, seems that 2.6.24 is OK but 2.6.25 is not. I must have missed the > > bug when testing 2.6.25-based kernels. > > > > I started a git bisection search but after half an hour I hit bad > > bisection breakage: a complete machine hang in fib_rules_init(). > > > > > > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > > > > this seen with? > > > > > > > > > > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. > > > > > > As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. > > > > 2.6.25 dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony.txt > > /var/log/messages: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/messages-sony.txt > > > > The latter includes this: > > > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class key not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class dccp_socket not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class memprotect not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class peer not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_recv in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission dccp_send in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:43 sony kernel: SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setkeycreate in class process not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setsockcreate in class process not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission polmatch in class association not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_in in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission flow_out in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1403 audit(1221309118.644:3): policy loaded auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > > Sep 13 12:32:44 sony kernel: type=1400 audit(1221334321.726:4): avc: denied { audit_write } for pid=400 comm="hwclock" capability=29 scontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 tclass=capability > > > > > > Why am I seeing this on two machines and two vanilla-installed distros > > but nobody else is reporting it? Running `ls -l /proc/net' on the FC6 machine produces: [ 132.591215] type=1400 audit(1221679672.590:10): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=4389 comm="ls" path="/proc/net" dev=proc ino=4026531867 scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:proc_net_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file > What we actually need to see is the output of: > /sbin/ausearch -i -m AVC -sv no akpm2:/home/akpm# /sbin/ausearch -i -m AVC -sv no <no matches> > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was > changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, > that introduced an additional permission check on accesses > of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. > And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older > kernels, older policies didn't allow it. > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have updated > their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary access. The fact > that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated policies isn't surprising > - they don't push updates to those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 > are both EOL'd, right? > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was > elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the messenger > please. > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 break? http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows 11,000-odd people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to assume that all those people have updated their selinux rules. And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I expect. Then again, given that this regression has been out there since 2.6.25, I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we suck. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman ` (2 more replies) 2008-09-17 21:56 ` Eric W. Biederman 1 sibling, 3 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Smalley, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, Eric W. Biederman, netdev On Wednesday 17 September 2008 3:50:53 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net > > was changed from being a directory to being a symlink to > > /proc/self/net, that introduced an additional permission check on > > accesses of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the > > symlink itself. And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net > > accesses with older kernels, older policies didn't allow it. > > > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have > > updated their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary > > access. The fact that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated > > policies isn't surprising - they don't push updates to those > > distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 are both EOL'd, right? > > > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was > > elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the > > messenger please. > > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 > break? > > http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows > 11,000-odd people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to > assume that all those people have updated their selinux rules. > > And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a > kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I > expect. Just so I'm clear on the context of the problem, it sounds like if a FC5 (I'm limiting myself to FC5 for the moment) user upgraded to a recent (2.6.25+) kernel (non-distro supplied in the case of FC5) then they will run into problems unless they also upgrade their SELinux policy, yes? If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. Maybe I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be fixed. > Then again, given that this regression has been out there since > 2.6.25, I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we > suck. We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. -- paul moore linux @ hp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-17 22:11 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 22:23 ` David Miller 2 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Moore Cc: Andrew Morton, Stephen Smalley, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> writes: > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested > in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. Agreed. I believe we carefully gave selinux the same paths for /proc/net that it had before so I don't know why this affects user space. I know we had some selinux review when we made the change. Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 22:11 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: paul.moore, sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:39:45 -0700 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> writes: > > > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested > > in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. > > Agreed. I believe we carefully gave selinux the same paths for /proc/net > that it had before so I don't know why this affects user space. > > I know we had some selinux review when we made the change. > > Eric It's back up-thread somewhere. umm... On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was > changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, > that introduced an additional permission check on accesses > of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. > And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older > kernels, older policies didn't allow it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-17 22:23 ` David Miller 2 siblings, 2 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Moore Cc: sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, ebiederm, netdev On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400 Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 3:50:53 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 > > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > > > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net > > > was changed from being a directory to being a symlink to > > > /proc/self/net, that introduced an additional permission check on > > > accesses of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the > > > symlink itself. And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net > > > accesses with older kernels, older policies didn't allow it. > > > > > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have > > > updated their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary > > > access. The fact that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated > > > policies isn't surprising - they don't push updates to those > > > distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 are both EOL'd, right? > > > > > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was > > > elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the > > > messenger please. > > > > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 > > break? > > > > http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows > > 11,000-odd people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to > > assume that all those people have updated their selinux rules. > > > > And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a > > kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I > > expect. > > Just so I'm clear on the context of the problem, it sounds like if a FC5 > (I'm limiting myself to FC5 for the moment) user upgraded to a recent > (2.6.25+) kernel (non-distro supplied in the case of FC5) then they > will run into problems unless they also upgrade their SELinux policy, > yes? That only true if the 2.6.25+ kernel.org kernel is backward-incompatible with the distro kernel. > If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. Maybe > I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the > distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those > are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to > make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be > fixed. Nope. Releasing a non-backward-compatible kernel.org kernel is a big deal. We'll do it sometimes, with long notice, much care and much deliberation. We did it this time by sheer accident. That's known in the trade as a "bug". > > Then again, given that this regression has been out there since > > 2.6.25, I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we > > suck. > > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested > in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. Because we unintentionally and unknowingly released a kernel which is not compatible with previous kernels without notifying any of our users and without any consideration or planning. Yes, often the consequences of the screwup are fairly small, but it's a screwup nonetheless. We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 22:24 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman 1 sibling, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, ebiederm, netdev On Wednesday 17 September 2008 5:48:42 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400 > > Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 3:50:53 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 > > > > > > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > > > > However, the most likely explanation is simply that when > > > > /proc/net was changed from being a directory to being a symlink > > > > to /proc/self/net, that introduced an additional permission > > > > check on accesses of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read > > > > check on the symlink itself. And since that check wasn't > > > > happening on /proc/net accesses with older kernels, older > > > > policies didn't allow it. > > > > > > > > As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have > > > > updated their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary > > > > access. The fact that legacy distros wouldn't have such > > > > updated policies isn't surprising - they don't push updates to > > > > those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 are both EOL'd, > > > > right? > > > > > > > > In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change > > > > was elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame > > > > the messenger please. > > > > > > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 > > > break? > > > > > > http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows > > > 11,000-odd people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to > > > assume that all those people have updated their selinux rules. > > > > > > And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a > > > kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I > > > expect. > > > > Just so I'm clear on the context of the problem, it sounds like if > > a FC5 (I'm limiting myself to FC5 for the moment) user upgraded to > > a recent (2.6.25+) kernel (non-distro supplied in the case of FC5) > > then they will run into problems unless they also upgrade their > > SELinux policy, yes? > > That only true if the 2.6.25+ kernel.org kernel is > backward-incompatible with the distro kernel. Yep, just wanted to make sure I was understanding the problem correctly. > > If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. > > Maybe I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away > > from the distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, > > although those are arguably less critical) you should also bear the > > responsibility to make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever > > other bits need to be fixed. > > Nope. Releasing a non-backward-compatible kernel.org kernel is a big > deal. Well, there is also the issue of distro specific "special sauce" patches which might cause different behavior from the kernel.org kernel, but now we are starting to do down a rat hole ... > We'll do it sometimes, with long notice, much care and much > deliberation. > > We did it this time by sheer accident. That's known in the trade as > a "bug". It is somewhat comforting to know that we can call what we do a "trade", further commentary on my part is best left to the imagination :) > > > Then again, given that this regression has been out there since > > > 2.6.25, I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we > > > suck. > > > > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more > > interested in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because > > of this. > > Because we unintentionally and unknowingly released a kernel which is > not compatible with previous kernels without notifying any of our > users and without any consideration or planning. > > Yes, often the consequences of the screwup are fairly small, but it's > a screwup nonetheless. Okay, so we suck because broke something in 2.6.25 that went undetected because current SELinux policies happen to be compatible with the breakage. Gotcha. > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? Can I assume that the "right" thing to do would be to find the problem and revert whatever change caused the issue, yes? Or are we happy to wait and see since the fallout so far has been minimal? -- paul moore linux @ hp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 22:24 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 22:53 ` Eric W. Biederman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Moore Cc: sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, ebiederm, netdev On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:12:59 -0400 Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote: > > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? > > Can I assume that the "right" thing to do would be to find the problem > and revert whatever change caused the issue, yes? Or are we happy to > wait and see since the fallout so far has been minimal? I don't think a revert is justified after all this time. afaik I'm the first person to notice the problem, and it's been out there for multiple months. However it would be good if we could find some not-completely-stinky way of making the old userspace work. otoh, people who are shipping 2.6.25- and 2.6.26-based distros probably wouldn't want such a patch in their kernels anyway. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 22:24 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 22:53 ` Eric W. Biederman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Paul Moore, sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, ebiederm, netdev Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:12:59 -0400 > Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote: > >> > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were >> > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? >> >> Can I assume that the "right" thing to do would be to find the problem >> and revert whatever change caused the issue, yes? Or are we happy to >> wait and see since the fallout so far has been minimal? > > I don't think a revert is justified after all this time. afaik I'm the > first person to notice the problem, and it's been out there for > multiple months. > > However it would be good if we could find some not-completely-stinky > way of making the old userspace work. > > otoh, people who are shipping 2.6.25- and 2.6.26-based distros probably > wouldn't want such a patch in their kernels anyway. Disable selinux? Get a selinux mystic to update that selinux policy. I bet it is a one line change to each the policy about /proc/net as a symlink. Although I am puzzled why we don't get the same label as /proc/net as a directory had. Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-18 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley 1 sibling, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Paul Moore, sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes: > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? This seems to me to be an extremely fragile selinux user space policy. In their code that derives security labels from path names. Why don't we have AppArmor in the kernel again? Further I don't see how we could have possibly have supported that user space policy. How can we apply a user space defined label required by the selinux policy to a symlink that did not exist? I expect cd /proc/self/net would work. In your situation and you can see /proc/self/net/dev. Everything here sounds to me like that selinux policy is impossibly brittle. And anything that is that brittle I have no intention in claiming is a bug in proc. Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-18 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-18 13:03 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:32 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? > > This seems to me to be an extremely fragile selinux user space policy. > In their code that derives security labels from path names. > Why don't we have AppArmor in the kernel again? I think I explained that one before - in the case of /proc, the only stable basis we have for deducing the security properties / protection requirements for a given entry is its name, and its name can be reliably constructed from the kernel's internal proc_dir_entry tree w/o any ambiguity or potential for userspace manipulation (unlike the pathname returned by d_path for a normal file). I'd agree that it isn't optimal, but it is what we have. > Further I don't see how we could have possibly have supported that user space > policy. How can we apply a user space defined label required by the selinux > policy to a symlink that did not exist? I'm not blaming anyone here, or trying to argue that the /proc/net changes should be reverted. What happened here is that a kernel interface (/proc/net) changed in a subtle way that had a side effect on permission checking, and we tried to hide that change at the time (in terms of ensuring that the new /proc/self/net tree would still be labeled correctly), and we missed the fact that there would still be a new check on the symlink read that wouldn't be covered by existing policy. > Everything here sounds to me like that selinux policy is impossibly brittle. > And anything that is that brittle I have no intention in claiming is a bug > in proc. I'm not arguing that this is a bug in proc or in selinux for that matter. I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to kernel changes. Users who are willing/able to run the latest kernel on their own w/o waiting for a coordinated update of kernel and policy from their distribution ought to be able to create a local policy module - it isn't rocket science, and they can always fall back on audit2allow if they need to do so. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-18 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 13:03 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:32 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > > > We don't even know the extent of the damage yet. Which distros were > > > affected? With which versions of which userspace packages? > > > > This seems to me to be an extremely fragile selinux user space policy. > > In their code that derives security labels from path names. > > Why don't we have AppArmor in the kernel again? > > I think I explained that one before - in the case of /proc, the only > stable basis we have for deducing the security properties / protection > requirements for a given entry is its name, and its name can be reliably > constructed from the kernel's internal proc_dir_entry tree w/o any > ambiguity or potential for userspace manipulation (unlike the pathname > returned by d_path for a normal file). I'd agree that it isn't optimal, > but it is what we have. > > > Further I don't see how we could have possibly have supported that user space > > policy. How can we apply a user space defined label required by the selinux > > policy to a symlink that did not exist? > > I'm not blaming anyone here, or trying to argue that the /proc/net > changes should be reverted. What happened here is that a kernel > interface (/proc/net) changed in a subtle way that had a side effect on > permission checking, and we tried to hide that change at the time (in > terms of ensuring that the new /proc/self/net tree would still be > labeled correctly), and we missed the fact that there would still be a > new check on the symlink read that wouldn't be covered by existing > policy. > > > Everything here sounds to me like that selinux policy is impossibly brittle. > > And anything that is that brittle I have no intention in claiming is a bug > > in proc. > > I'm not arguing that this is a bug in proc or in selinux for that > matter. > > I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update > policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set > of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is > not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't > "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to > kernel changes. I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old policy will Just Work. > Users who are willing/able to run the latest kernel on their own w/o > waiting for a coordinated update of kernel and policy from their > distribution ought to be able to create a local policy module - it isn't > rocket science, and they can always fall back on audit2allow if they > need to do so. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-18 13:03 ` Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-18 18:34 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-18 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Smalley Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> writes: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: >> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update >> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set >> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is >> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't >> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to >> kernel changes. > > I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our > way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of > compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc > (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). > But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set > of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't > think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old > policy will Just Work. I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from breaking selinux policies when I do that? For comparison how do we handle sysfs? How do we handle device nodes in tmpfs? Ultimately do we want to implement xattrs and inotify on /proc? Or is there another way that would simplify maintenance? Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-18 18:34 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-19 16:58 ` david 2008-09-29 16:49 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 2 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-18 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev, Eric Paris On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> writes: > > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > >> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update > >> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set > >> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is > >> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't > >> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to > >> kernel changes. > > > > I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our > > way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of > > compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc > > (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). > > But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set > > of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't > > think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old > > policy will Just Work. > > I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into > symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from > breaking selinux policies when I do that? I suspect we could tweak the logic in selinux_proc_get_sid() to always label all symlinks under /proc with the base proc_t type already used for e.g. /proc/self, at which point existing policies would be ok. > For comparison how do we handle sysfs? Unresolved; presently has a single label for all nodes. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228902 for prior discussion of fine-grained labeling support for sysfs. > How do we handle device nodes in tmpfs? udev has selinux support - looks up the appropriate context in a userland config file (file_contexts) via libselinux matchpathcon(3) and sets it upon creation. tmpfs has long supported getting/setting security.* attributes. > Ultimately do we want to implement xattrs and inotify on /proc? > Or is there another way that would simplify maintenance? If proc supported setxattr, then I suppose early userspace could label it instead of the kernel needing to determine a label internally. But not sure how we'd cleanly migrate to avoid breakage with old userspace. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-18 18:34 ` Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-19 16:58 ` david 2008-09-19 17:07 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-29 16:49 ` Stephen Smalley 1 sibling, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: david @ 2008-09-19 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Smalley Cc: Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev, Eric Paris On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> writes: >> >>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: >>>> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update >>>> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set >>>> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is >>>> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't >>>> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to >>>> kernel changes. >>> >>> I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our >>> way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of >>> compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc >>> (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). >>> But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set >>> of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't >>> think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old >>> policy will Just Work. >> >> I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into >> symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from >> breaking selinux policies when I do that? > > I suspect we could tweak the logic in selinux_proc_get_sid() to always > label all symlinks under /proc with the base proc_t type already used > for e.g. /proc/self, at which point existing policies would be ok. so if proc is mounted anywhere other then /proc the selinux policy would do odd things? David Lang >> For comparison how do we handle sysfs? > > Unresolved; presently has a single label for all nodes. > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228902 > for prior discussion of fine-grained labeling support for sysfs. > >> How do we handle device nodes in tmpfs? > > udev has selinux support - looks up the appropriate context in a > userland config file (file_contexts) via libselinux matchpathcon(3) and > sets it upon creation. tmpfs has long supported getting/setting > security.* attributes. > >> Ultimately do we want to implement xattrs and inotify on /proc? >> Or is there another way that would simplify maintenance? > > If proc supported setxattr, then I suppose early userspace could label > it instead of the kernel needing to determine a label internally. But > not sure how we'd cleanly migrate to avoid breakage with old userspace. > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-19 16:58 ` david @ 2008-09-19 17:07 ` Stephen Smalley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-19 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: david Cc: Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev, Eric Paris On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:58 -0700, david@lang.hm wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> writes: > >> > >>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > >>>> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update > >>>> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set > >>>> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is > >>>> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't > >>>> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to > >>>> kernel changes. > >>> > >>> I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our > >>> way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of > >>> compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc > >>> (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). > >>> But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set > >>> of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't > >>> think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old > >>> policy will Just Work. > >> > >> I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into > >> symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from > >> breaking selinux policies when I do that? > > > > I suspect we could tweak the logic in selinux_proc_get_sid() to always > > label all symlinks under /proc with the base proc_t type already used > > for e.g. /proc/self, at which point existing policies would be ok. > > so if proc is mounted anywhere other then /proc the selinux policy would > do odd things? No, the logic doesn't care where proc is mounted. Only the name relative to the root of proc is used. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-18 18:34 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-19 16:58 ` david @ 2008-09-29 16:49 ` Stephen Smalley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Stephen Smalley @ 2008-09-29 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev, Eric Paris On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:34 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:09 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> writes: > > > > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:38 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > >> I do however think that the mantra that we can't require users to update > > >> policy for kernel changes is unsupportable in general. The precise set > > >> of permission checks on a given operation is not set in stone and it is > > >> not part of the kernel/userland interface/contract. Policy isn't > > >> "userspace"; it governs what userspace can do, and it has to adapt to > > >> kernel changes. > > > > > > I should note here that for changes to SELinux, we have gone out of our > > > way to avoid such breakage to date through the introduction of > > > compatibility switches, policy flags to enable any new checks, etc > > > (albeit at a cost in complexity and ever creeping compatibility code). > > > But changes to the rest of the kernel can just as easily alter the set > > > of permission checks that get applied on a given operation, and I don't > > > think we are always going to be able to guarantee that new kernel + old > > > policy will Just Work. > > > > I know of at least 2 more directories that I intend to turn into > > symlinks into somewhere under /proc/self. How do we keep from > > breaking selinux policies when I do that? > > I suspect we could tweak the logic in selinux_proc_get_sid() to always > label all symlinks under /proc with the base proc_t type already used > for e.g. /proc/self, at which point existing policies would be ok. FWIW, a fix for this issue has been applied to: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next The particular commit can be viewed at: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6.git;a=commit;h=ea6b184f7d521a503ecab71feca6e4057562252b This should address not only the /proc/net breakage but also any future changes to turn existing directories into symlinks. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton @ 2008-09-17 22:23 ` David Miller 2 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-17 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: paul.moore Cc: akpm, sds, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, ebiederm, netdev From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400 > If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. Maybe > I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the > distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those > are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to > make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be > fixed. No, we tend to call this breaking things instead. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore @ 2008-09-17 21:56 ` Eric W. Biederman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2008-09-17 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Smalley, jmorris, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, netdev Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:05:26 -0400 > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: >> On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 12:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> However, the most likely explanation is simply that when /proc/net was >> changed from being a directory to being a symlink to /proc/self/net, >> that introduced an additional permission check on accesses >> of /proc/net/<whatever>, namely the read check on the symlink itself. >> And since that check wasn't happening on /proc/net accesses with older >> kernels, older policies didn't allow it. >> As to why others haven't reported it, I expect that they have updated >> their policies to newer ones that allow the necessary access. The fact >> that legacy distros wouldn't have such updated policies isn't surprising >> - they don't push updates to those distros for new kernels. FC5 and FC6 >> are both EOL'd, right? >> >> In any event, we didn't change anything in SELinux - the change was >> elsewhere (in the proc/net implementation). Don't blame the messenger >> please. >> > > Vanilla FC5 broke and vanilla FC6 broke. Did vanilla FC7, 8 or 9 break? > > http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats/stats.html shows 11,000-odd > people running FC5 and FC6. It would be incautious to assume that all > those people have updated their selinux rules. > > And _requiring_ people to update their selinux rules to fix a > kernel-caused regression is a pretty big deal for some people, I > expect. > Then again, given that this regression has been out there since 2.6.25, > I guess not too many people are hurting from it. But we suck. Looking at this discussion closely from what I see selinux is designed to work on the principle of least privilege. If you make a user space visible but compatible change, selinux will keep the system until you update selinux. Is selinux exposing too much to user space? selinux was taken into consideration when the change was made. The patch was even updated with feedback from Stephen Smiley. > commit e9720acd728a46cb40daa52c99a979f7c4ff195c > Author: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> > Date: Fri Mar 7 11:08:40 2008 -0800 > > [NET]: Make /proc/net a symlink on /proc/self/net (v3) > > Current /proc/net is done with so called "shadows", but current > implementation is broken and has little chances to get fixed. > > The problem is that dentries subtree of /proc/net directory has > fancy revalidation rules to make processes living in different > net namespaces see different entries in /proc/net subtree, but > currently, tasks see in the /proc/net subdir the contents of any > other namespace, depending on who opened the file first. > > The proposed fix is to turn /proc/net into a symlink, which points > to /proc/self/net, which in turn shows what previously was in > /proc/net - the network-related info, from the net namespace the > appropriate task lives in. > > # ls -l /proc/net > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Mar 5 15:17 /proc/net -> self/net > > In other words - this behaves like /proc/mounts, but unlike > "mounts", "net" is not a file, but a directory. > > Changes from v2: > * Fixed discrepancy of /proc/net nlink count and selinux labeling > screwup pointed out by Stephen. > > To get the correct nlink count the ->getattr callback for /proc/net > is overridden to read one from the net->proc_net entry. > > To make selinux still work the net->proc_net entry is initialized > properly, i.e. with the "net" name and the proc_net parent. > > Selinux fixes are > Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> > > Changes from v1: > * Fixed a task_struct leak in get_proc_task_net, pointed out by Paul. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (32 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-19 16:17 ` Marcin Slusarz 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Marcin Slusarz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-19 16:17 ` Marcin Slusarz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Marcin Slusarz @ 2008-09-19 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:06:29PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). I didn't see it since I upgraded to -rc6. You can close it for now. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 > Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) > Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> > Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (9 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4 > > Marcin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (33 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gregory Haskins, Ingo Molnar, Lin Ming, Peter Zijlstra This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg09735.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (35 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 20:56 ` Chris Mason 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Mason This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11548 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Submitter : Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Date : 2008-09-08 14:26 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088566310440&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 20:56 ` Chris Mason 2008-09-12 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Chris Mason @ 2008-09-12 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 21:06 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > This is still a bug, but I haven't tried this workload on 2.6.26, so I'm not sure it is a regression. Unfortunately, I won't be able to test it again until after the plumber's conference. -chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! 2008-09-12 20:56 ` Chris Mason @ 2008-09-12 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Mason; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Friday, 12 of September 2008, Chris Mason wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 21:06 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > This is still a bug, but I haven't tried this workload on 2.6.26, so I'm > not sure it is a regression. Unfortunately, I won't be able to test it > again until after the plumber's conference. That's fine. In case it turns out to be a regression, it's better to list it for now IMO. :-) Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (36 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, jmerkey This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098180019264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (37 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11547] build issue #565 for v2.6.27-rc5 : undefined reference to `ei_interrupt' in hp-plus.c Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jason Vas Dias This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (6 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11547] build issue #565 for v2.6.27-rc5 : undefined reference to `ei_interrupt' in hp-plus.c 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (38 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Randy.Dunlap, Toralf Förster This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11547 Subject : build issue #565 for v2.6.27-rc5 : undefined reference to `ei_interrupt' in hp-plus.c Submitter : Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Date : 2008-09-07 13:19 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122079361508022&w=4 Handled-By : Randy.Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122038632306156&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11547] build issue #565 for v2.6.27-rc5 : undefined reference to `ei_interrupt' in hp-plus.c Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (40 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 22:52 ` Rene Herman 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11553] Strange looking line from "ps aux" Rafael J. Wysocki ` (6 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098498125536&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 22:52 ` Rene Herman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rene Herman @ 2008-09-12 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop On 12-09-08 21:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 > Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> > Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (4 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 > Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> > Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098498125536&w=4 It should be. The patch listed should be good as far as I'm concerned but needs to be pushed by Bjorn as PnP mainatainer. Generally speaking 0 wouldn't be a _very_ necesarily invalid value it seems so it's maybe not very nice. If someone wants a changelog though, this should do: === PNP: avoid checking unitialized BARs for conflicts Avoid checking a PCI BAR for conflicts if the BIOS left it unitialized. Reported-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Signed-off-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com> === (Frans: Tested-by?) Rene. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11553] Strange looking line from "ps aux" 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (41 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 8:51 ` Alan Jenkins 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11554] Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rogério Brito This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Subject : Strange looking line from "ps aux" Submitter : Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> Date : 2008-09-11 17:43 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122115506018275&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11553] Strange looking line from "ps aux" 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11553] Strange looking line from "ps aux" Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-13 8:51 ` Alan Jenkins 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Alan Jenkins @ 2008-09-13 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rogério Brito Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 > Subject : Strange looking line from "ps aux" > Submitter : Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> > Date : 2008-09-11 17:43 (2 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122115506018275&w=4 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Isn't this another instance of <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209>? If you can try 2.6.27-rc6, that should fix it. Alan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11554] Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (42 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11553] Strange looking line from "ps aux" Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 23:37 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Abdel Benamrouche, Andrew Morton, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski, Linus Torvalds This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11554 Subject : Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 Submitter : Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br> Date : 2008-09-12 16:56 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122123862519434&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11554] Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11554] Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-13 23:37 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski 2008-09-15 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski @ 2008-09-13 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Abdel Benamrouche, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds On Friday 12 September 2008 16:06:31 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11554 > Subject : Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 > Submitter : Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br> > Date : 2008-09-12 16:56 (1 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122123862519434&w=4 > Fixed now with commit 8d99f83b9478768d3a8d7d1bcd9bd182c75a0447 -- []'s Herton ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11554] Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 2008-09-13 23:37 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski @ 2008-09-15 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-15 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Abdel Benamrouche, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds On Sunday, 14 of September 2008, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Friday 12 September 2008 16:06:31 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11554 > > Subject : Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 > > Submitter : Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br> > > Date : 2008-09-12 16:56 (1 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122123862519434&w=4 > > > > Fixed now with commit 8d99f83b9478768d3a8d7d1bcd9bd182c75a0447 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (43 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11554] Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 3:24 ` Justin Mattock 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (3 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Justin Mattock, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11552 Subject : Disabling IRQ #23 Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-09 19:08 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098735230906&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107367715361&w=4 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-13 3:24 ` Justin Mattock 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Justin Mattock @ 2008-09-13 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Yinghai Lu On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11552 > Subject : Disabling IRQ #23 > Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> > Date : 2008-09-09 19:08 (4 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098735230906&w=4 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107367715361&w=4 > Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> > > > yeah I think it would be a good idea. something to do with ehci_hcd, i.g. if I blacklist ehci_hcd Disabling IRQ#23 message doesnt seem to be showing up. -- Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (44 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11557] Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (2 subsequent siblings) 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Steven Noonan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11551 Subject : Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Submitter : Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net> Date : 2008-09-10 18:07 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107007407994&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11557] Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (45 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 15:13 ` Matthew Garrett 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11559] 2.6.27-rc6: nohz + s2ram = need to press keys to get progress Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11556] e100: PCI wake-up handling rework causes "Error clearing wake event" Rafael J. Wysocki 48 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matthew Garrett, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11557 Subject : Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Date : 2008-09-08 15:10 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088987319698&w=4 Handled-By : Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11557] Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11557] Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-13 15:13 ` Matthew Garrett 2008-09-14 10:18 ` Pavel Machek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Matthew Garrett @ 2008-09-13 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek I don't think this is a regression. The correct way to drive this hardware has always been through the ACPI video driver. The fact that thinkpad-acpi would also attempt to drive it was a bug. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11557] Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 2008-09-13 15:13 ` Matthew Garrett @ 2008-09-14 10:18 ` Pavel Machek 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Pavel Machek @ 2008-09-14 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sat 2008-09-13 16:13:30, Matthew Garrett wrote: > I don't think this is a regression. The correct way to drive this > hardware has always been through the ACPI video driver. The fact that > thinkpad-acpi would also attempt to drive it was a bug. I'm pretty sure thinkpad-acpi is older then ACPI-video. So yes, I believe this is a regression, but it may be pretty old one. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11559] 2.6.27-rc6: nohz + s2ram = need to press keys to get progress 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (46 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11557] Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11556] e100: PCI wake-up handling rework causes "Error clearing wake event" Rafael J. Wysocki 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11559 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6: nohz + s2ram = need to press keys to get progress Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Date : 2008-09-12 8:31 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122121384705262&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11556] e100: PCI wake-up handling rework causes "Error clearing wake event" 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (47 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11559] 2.6.27-rc6: nohz + s2ram = need to press keys to get progress Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 48 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-12 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11556 Subject : e100: PCI wake-up handling rework causes "Error clearing wake event" Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 6:12 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122094080712131&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122096638020191&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 @ 2008-11-02 16:47 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-11-02 16:49 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-11-02 195 34 28 2008-10-26 190 34 29 2008-10-04 181 41 33 2008-09-27 173 35 28 2008-09-21 169 45 36 2008-09-15 163 46 32 2008-09-12 163 51 38 2008-09-07 150 43 33 2008-08-30 135 48 36 2008-08-23 122 48 40 2008-08-16 103 47 37 2008-08-10 80 52 31 2008-08-02 47 31 20 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11876 Subject : RCU hang on cpu re-hotplug with 2.6.27rc8 Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-10-06 23:28 (28 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122333610602399&w=2 Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11843 Subject : usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2 Submitter : Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> Date : 2008-10-22 16:22 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122469318102679&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11836 Subject : Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-10-21 9:59 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122458320502371&w=4 Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832 Subject : 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100 Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com> Date : 2008-10-19 14:06 (15 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122442552100406&w=4 Handled-By : Stefan Assmann <sassmann@suse.de> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11830 Subject : disk statistics issue in 2.6.27 Submitter : Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> Date : 2008-10-19 11:31 (15 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441671421326&w=4 Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11820 Subject : 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system Submitter : Antipov Dmitry <dmantipov@yandex.ru> Date : 2008-10-15 6:39 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122405421010969&w=4 Handled-By : Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11795 Subject : ks959-sir dongle no longer works under 2.6.27 (REGRESSION) Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2008-10-20 10:49 (14 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699 Subject : 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0 Submitter : Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de> Date : 2008-09-28 17:45 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698 Subject : 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de> Date : 2008-09-29 11:29 (35 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664 Subject : acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr Submitter : Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-28 03:48 (36 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (48 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (49 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569 Subject : Panic stop CPUs regression Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (62 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com> Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (63 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (74 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (74 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (75 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (82 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (84 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (90 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (90 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (88 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (95 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (95 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : IRQ routing badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (95 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz> Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (95 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122470441624295&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (95 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11907 Subject : NVRAM being corrupted on ppc64 preventing boot Submitter : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Date : 2008-10-30 14:26 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122537727204584&w=4 Handled-By : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547833412996&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11904 Subject : upstream regression (IO-APIC?) Submitter : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Date : 2008-10-30 0:00 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122532510328618&w=4 Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122563711522315&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11829 Subject : Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE) Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2008-10-19 11:26 (15 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441560120027&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Mike Isely <isely@isely.net> Patch : http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2/rev/0bb411d8d2e4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11805 Subject : mounting XFS produces a segfault Submitter : Tiago Maluta <maluta_tiago@yahoo.com.br> Date : 2008-10-21 18:00 (13 days old) Handled-By : Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18397&action=view Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (60 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-11-02 16:47 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman, Rene Herman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* 2.6.28-rc1-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 @ 2008-10-25 21:04 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List [Here's something new, a list of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. We haven't fixed all of them yet and they're still being reported. Also, they need to be fixed as well as those introduced later (although they may be considered as "less important"). Quite frankly, I don't know how this is going to work out, but I thought it's worth trying. Enjoy! ;-)] This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-10-26 190 34 29 2008-10-04 181 41 33 2008-09-27 173 35 28 2008-09-21 169 45 36 2008-09-15 163 46 32 2008-09-12 163 51 38 2008-09-07 150 43 33 2008-08-30 135 48 36 2008-08-23 122 48 40 2008-08-16 103 47 37 2008-08-10 80 52 31 2008-08-02 47 31 20 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11843 Subject : usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2 Submitter : Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> Date : 2008-10-22 16:22 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122469318102679&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11836 Subject : Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-10-21 9:59 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122458320502371&w=4 Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832 Subject : 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100 Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com> Date : 2008-10-19 14:06 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122442552100406&w=4 Handled-By : Stefan Assmann <sassmann@suse.de> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11830 Subject : disk statistics issue in 2.6.27 Submitter : Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> Date : 2008-10-19 11:31 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441671421326&w=4 Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11820 Subject : 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system Submitter : Antipov Dmitry <dmantipov@yandex.ru> Date : 2008-10-15 6:39 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122405421010969&w=4 Handled-By : Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11721 Subject : after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate Submitter : Aldo Maggi <sentiniate@tiscali.it> Date : 2008-10-08 08:08 (18 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699 Subject : 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0 Submitter : Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de> Date : 2008-09-28 17:45 (28 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698 Subject : 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de> Date : 2008-09-29 11:29 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664 Subject : acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr Submitter : Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-28 03:48 (28 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (40 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (41 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569 Subject : Panic stop CPUs regression Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (54 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com> Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (51 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (67 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (74 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (76 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (82 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (82 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (80 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz> Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122470441624295&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11831 Subject : NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll Submitter : Ben Castricum <lk0810@bencastricum.nl> Date : 2008-10-19 11:02 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441506419398&w=4 Handled-By : Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122428548613067&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11829 Subject : Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE) Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2008-10-19 11:26 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441560120027&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Mike Isely <isely@isely.net> Patch : http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2/rev/0bb411d8d2e4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669 Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old) References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669 Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (47 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (52 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-10-25 21:04 2.6.28-rc1-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman, Rene Herman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (47 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2008-10-26 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Rene Herman, Rene Herman On Saturday 25 October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 > Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages AFAIK the issue should still be listed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 @ 2008-10-04 17:28 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-04 17:32 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-04 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-10-04 181 41 33 2008-09-27 173 35 28 2008-09-21 169 45 36 2008-09-15 163 46 32 2008-09-12 163 51 38 2008-09-07 150 43 33 2008-08-30 135 48 36 2008-08-23 122 48 40 2008-08-16 103 47 37 2008-08-10 80 52 31 2008-08-02 47 31 20 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11700 Subject : ACPI instabilities and IRQs being disabled Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Date : 2008-09-27 22:40 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122255527412178&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699 Subject : 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0 Submitter : Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de> Date : 2008-09-28 17:45 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698 Subject : 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de> Date : 2008-09-29 11:29 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11697 Subject : CD tray closes spontaneously after opening it Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-30 10:47 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122277167125264&w=4 Handled-By : Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11695 Subject : USB disconnects every 30 seconds Submitter : Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Date : 2008-10-03 17:45 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122305738430115&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11676 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2 to rc8, apgart fails, iommu=soft works, regression Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Date : 2008-09-30 10:24 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664 Subject : acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr Submitter : Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-28 03:48 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11643 Subject : ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0) Submitter : sangu <sangu.gnome@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-24 16:51 (11 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11634 Subject : Sometime my laptop is dead on resume from ram Submitter : Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-24 01:12 (11 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569 Subject : Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (21 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com> Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (28 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (30 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (34 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (46 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (61 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (61 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (59 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (64 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz> Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11701 Subject : sky2 wol regression Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de> Date : 2008-09-24 8:05 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122224359222164&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122298334522551&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11696 Subject : 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times Submitter : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Date : 2008-10-03 10:21 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122302939313636&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122307260621434&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629 Subject : quad G5 fails to shut down Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2008-09-23 14:20 (12 days old) Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629#c8 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615 Subject : sata_nv EH problems Submitter : Pär Andersson <paran@lysator.liu.se> Date : 2008-09-21 18:09 (14 days old) Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18078&action=view Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18047&action=view Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (31 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (41 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442#c1 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-10-04 17:28 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-04 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-07 22:34 ` Frans Pop 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-04 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman, Rene Herman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-10-04 17:32 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-07 22:34 ` Frans Pop 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2008-10-07 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Rene Herman, Rene Herman On Saturday 04 October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 > Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> > Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (26 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 > Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> > Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 The structural patch for this from Bjorn got NACKed. AFAIK we're still waiting for someone (Bjorn?) to decide whether to go with a simpler patch from Rene for .27 and to push that. For me it was possible to work around the issue by changing a BIOS setting, but I expect it will still affect others with similar BIOS behavior. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* 2.6.27-rc7-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 @ 2008-09-27 15:54 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-27 15:56 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-27 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-09-27 173 35 28 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11643 Subject : ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0) Submitter : sangu <sangu.gnome@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-24 16:51 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11634 Subject : Sometime my laptop is dead on resume from ram Submitter : Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-24 01:12 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615 Subject : sata_nv EH problems Submitter : Pär Andersson <paran@lysator.liu.se> Date : 2008-09-21 18:09 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569 Subject : Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (14 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com> Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (21 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (25 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (51 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (39 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (46 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (48 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (54 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (54 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (52 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (58 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11654 Subject : Devices enabled in /proc/acpi/wakeup do not wake up any more Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de> Date : 2008-09-22 20:29 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122211535021493&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122224359222164&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122238185304167&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122237497811138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629 Subject : quad G5 fails to shut down Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2008-09-23 14:20 (5 days old) Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629#c8 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18047&action=view Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (34 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442#c1 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Subject : corrupt PMD after resume Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-27 15:54 2.6.27-rc7-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-27 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-27 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman, Rene Herman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 @ 2008-09-21 18:52 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-09-21 169 45 36 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11611 Subject : Commit 2344abbcbdb82140050e8be29d3d55e4f6fe860b breaks resume on nx6325 Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2008-09-20 23:24 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122195277606974&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11610 Subject : Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 Submitter : Michal 'vorner' Vaner <vorner@ucw.cz> Date : 2008-09-21 17:35 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122201853409501&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11609 Subject : oops in find_get_page Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-20 14:53 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122192251101892&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 =C2=A0Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11590 Subject : Nokia 5310 Xpress usb-storage not mounting Submitter : David Almaroad <dalmaroad@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-18 21:35 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569 Subject : Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (8 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11551 Subject : Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Submitter : Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net> Date : 2008-09-10 18:07 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107007407994&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11548 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Submitter : Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Date : 2008-09-08 14:26 (14 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088566310440&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com> Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27= -rc5 Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (15 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Subject : reiserfs =C2=A0BUG in 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11501 Subject : Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-09-04 18:34 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055342419068&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (21 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465 Subject : Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net> Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122012238925775&w=4 Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 Subject : kernel crash after wifi connection established Submitter : Alexey Kuznetsov <ak@axet.ru> Date : 2008-08-30 03:08 (23 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 Subject : Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Submitter : uwe <kender@freenet.de> Date : 2008-08-16 14:17 (37 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (40 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (41 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (42 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (48 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (48 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (46 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (51 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (52 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11555 Subject : rmmod ide-cd_mod: tried to init an initialized =C2=A0object, something is s= eriously wrong. Submitter : Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Date : 2008-07-16 2:22 (68 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=122061839713526&w=4 Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095622602315&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11552 Subject : Disabling IRQ #23 Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-09 19:08 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098735230906&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107367715361&w=4 Handled-By : David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122187222705195&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098498125536&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098180019264&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg09735.html Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (28 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439 Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael@numericable.fr> Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4 Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Subject : corrupt PMD after resume Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (51 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman, Rene Herman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098498125536&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [bisected][resend] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
@ 2008-09-09 10:50 Frans Pop
2008-09-20 23:49 ` Frans Pop
0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread
From: Frans Pop @ 2008-09-09 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Rene Herman, Bjorn Helgaas, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1546 bytes --]
The only thing I used to get for pnp 00:08 on my Toshiba Satellite A40
up to 2.6.26 was this single line:
pnp 00:08: can't add resource for IO 0xa8-0xa9
During bisecting I have found that fairly early in the 2.6.27 cycle this
was "fixed" and that message disappeared. The commit that changed this was:
commit aee3ad815dd291a7193ab01da0f1a30c84d00061
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Fri Jun 27 16:56:57 2008 -0600
PNP: replace pnp_resource_table with dynamically allocated resources
Was it expected that that change could lead to a message disappearing?
I don't really read that from the commit description.
So far for the intro, now the issue (regression?) that prompted this mail.
Now with 2.6.27-rc4/5 I'm suddenly getting a total of 78 (!) warnings
about "io resource overlaps" for pnp 00:08 in my dmesg, even though
AFAIK those have never caused any trouble.
Bisection identified this commit as the cause:
commit 999ed65ad12e374d7445fbc13f5a1d146ae4b0da
Author: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jul 25 19:44:47 2008 -0700
pnp: have quirk_system_pci_resources() include io resources
The PCI devices mentioned in the messages (1f.5 and 1f.6) are the ICH4
AC'97 audio controller and AC'97 (software) modem. At least sound works
fine _without_ this change; I don't really use the softmodem.
I'm not completely sure what pnp 00:08 is. Seems to have the "system"
driver.
Anyway, I wonder if this patch is really desirable as a general check.
Full dmesg and kernel config attached.
Cheers,
FJP
[-- Attachment #2: dmesg_2.6.27-rc5 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 28021 bytes --]
Linux version 2.6.27-rc5 (root@faramir) (gcc version 4.3.1 (Debian 4.3.1-9) ) #70 SMP Sat Aug 30 20:15:30 CEST 2008
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000eee00 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000000eee00 - 00000000000ef000 (ACPI NVS)
BIOS-e820: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001ef40000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 000000001ef40000 - 000000001ef50000 (ACPI data)
BIOS-e820: 000000001ef50000 - 000000001f000000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000fec10000 - 00000000fec20000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000feda0000 - 00000000fedc0000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000ffb00000 - 00000000ffc00000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000ffe80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
last_pfn = 0x1ef40 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000
x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
kernel direct mapping tables up to 1ef40000 @ 7000-d000
RAMDISK: 1ebb1000 - 1ef2f2b0
DMI 2.3 present.
ACPI: RSDP 000F0180, 0014 (r0 TOSHIB)
ACPI: RSDT 1EF40000, 0038 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000)
ACPI: FACP 1EF40060, 0084 (r2 TOSHIB 750 20030101 TASM 4010000)
ACPI: DSDT 1EF40558, 4B72 (r1 TOSHIB A000C 20031216 MSFT 100000E)
ACPI: FACS 000EEE00, 0040
ACPI: SSDT 1EF402CA, 0082 (r1 TOSHIB A000C 20030917 MSFT 100000E)
ACPI: DBGP 1EF400E4, 0034 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000)
ACPI: BOOT 1EF40038, 0028 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000)
ACPI: APIC 1EF40118, 0062 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000)
ACPI: DMI detected: Toshiba
0MB HIGHMEM available.
495MB LOWMEM available.
mapped low ram: 0 - 1ef40000
low ram: 00000000 - 1ef40000
bootmap 00002000 - 00005de8
(9 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 001ef40000]
#0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000]
#1 [0000001000 - 0000002000] EX TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000001000 - 0000002000]
#2 [0000006000 - 0000007000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000007000]
#3 [0000100000 - 000043e1fc] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000100000 - 000043e1fc]
#4 [001ebb1000 - 001ef2f2b0] RAMDISK ==> [001ebb1000 - 001ef2f2b0]
#5 [000043f000 - 0000442000] INIT_PG_TABLE ==> [000043f000 - 0000442000]
#6 [000009fc00 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009fc00 - 0000100000]
#7 [0000007000 - 0000009000] PGTABLE ==> [0000007000 - 0000009000]
#8 [0000002000 - 0000006000] BOOTMAP ==> [0000002000 - 0000006000]
Zone PFN ranges:
DMA 0x00000000 -> 0x00001000
Normal 0x00001000 -> 0x0001ef40
HighMem 0x0001ef40 -> 0x0001ef40
Movable zone start PFN for each node
early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges
0: 0x00000000 -> 0x0000009f
0: 0x00000100 -> 0x0001ef40
On node 0 totalpages: 126687
free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c0388120, node_mem_map c1000000
DMA zone: 3967 pages, LIFO batch:0
Normal zone: 121729 pages, LIFO batch:31
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0xd808
ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] disabled)
ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1])
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs
Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
SMP: Allowing 2 CPUs, 1 hotplug CPUs
mapped APIC to ffffb000 (fee00000)
mapped IOAPIC to ffffa000 (fec00000)
PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000000009f000 - 00000000000a0000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000a0000 - 00000000000e0000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000ee000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000ee000 - 00000000000ef000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000
Allocating PCI resources starting at 20000000 (gap: 1f000000:dfc00000)
PERCPU: Allocating 36828 bytes of per cpu data
NR_CPUS: 8, nr_cpu_ids: 2, nr_node_ids 1
Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 125696
Kernel command line: root=/dev/mapper/strider-root ro vga=791 quiet
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes)
TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
Detected 2792.998 MHz processor.
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
console [tty0] enabled
Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Memory: 495180k/507136k available (1761k kernel code, 11400k reserved, 958k data, 232k init, 0k highmem)
virtual kernel memory layout:
fixmap : 0xfff51000 - 0xfffff000 ( 696 kB)
pkmap : 0xff800000 - 0xffc00000 (4096 kB)
vmalloc : 0xdf800000 - 0xff7fe000 ( 511 MB)
lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xdef40000 ( 495 MB)
.init : 0xc03b1000 - 0xc03eb000 ( 232 kB)
.data : 0xc02b863a - 0xc03a8208 ( 958 kB)
.text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc02b863a (1761 kB)
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok.
CPA: page pool initialized 1 of 1 pages preallocated
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 5585.99 BogoMIPS (lpj=11171992)
Security Framework initialized
SELinux: Disabled at boot.
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K
CPU: L2 cache: 512K
CPU: Hyper-Threading is disabled
Intel machine check architecture supported.
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
CPU0: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (12) available
CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
ACPI: Core revision 20080609
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
CPU0: Intel Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz stepping 09
Brought up 1 CPUs
Total of 1 processors activated (5585.99 BogoMIPS).
CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
domain 0: span 0 level CPU
groups: 0
net_namespace: 816 bytes
NET: Registered protocol family 16
ACPI: bus type pci registered
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd2fe, last bus=3
PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
ACPI Error (dsobject-0501): Package List length (F) larger than NumElements count (2), truncated
[20080609]
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5)
ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
pci 0000:00:02.0: supports D1
pci 0000:00:02.1: supports D1
pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# disabled
HPET not enabled in BIOS. You might try hpet=force boot option
pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region d800-d87f claimed by ICH4 ACPI/GPIO/TCO
pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region eec0-eeff claimed by ICH4 GPIO
pci 0000:00:1f.5: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
pci 0000:00:1f.5: PME# disabled
pci 0000:00:1f.6: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
pci 0000:00:1f.6: PME# disabled
pci 0000:01:08.0: supports D1
pci 0000:01:08.0: supports D2
pci 0000:01:08.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot D3cold
pci 0000:01:08.0: PME# disabled
pci 0000:00:1e.0: transparent bridge
PCI: bridge 0000:00:1e.0 io port: [cfff0000c000, de4dba00de545e58]
PCI: bridge 0000:00:1e.0 32bit mmio: [cfffffffcff00000, de4dba00de545e58]
bus 00 -> node 0
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIB._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *10)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11)
ACPI: Power Resource [PFAN] (off)
Linux Plug and Play Support v0.97 (c) Adam Belay
pnp: PnP ACPI init
ACPI: bus type pnp registered
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x62-0x62) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x66-0x66) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x80-0x80) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x84-0x86) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x88-0x88) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x8c-0x8e) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xe0-0xef) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x24-0x25) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x28-0x29) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2c-0x2d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x30-0x31) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x34-0x35) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x38-0x39) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x3c-0x3d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x50-0x53) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x63-0x63) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x65-0x65) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x72-0x77) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x90-0x9f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xa4-0xa5) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xa8-0xa9) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xac-0xad) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xb0-0xb5) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xb8-0xb9) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xbc-0xbd) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x24-0x25) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x28-0x29) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2c-0x2d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x30-0x31) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x34-0x35) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x38-0x39) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x3c-0x3d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x62-0x62) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x66-0x66) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x80-0x80) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x84-0x86) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x88-0x88) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x8c-0x8e) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xe0-0xef) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x24-0x25) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x28-0x29) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2c-0x2d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x30-0x31) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x34-0x35) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x38-0x39) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x3c-0x3d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x50-0x53) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x63-0x63) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x65-0x65) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x72-0x77) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x90-0x9f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xa4-0xa5) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xa8-0xa9) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xac-0xad) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xb0-0xb5) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xb8-0xb9) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0xbc-0xbd) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x62-0x62) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x66-0x66) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x24-0x25) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x28-0x29) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2c-0x2d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x30-0x31) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x34-0x35) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x38-0x39) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x3c-0x3d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x50-0x53) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x63-0x63) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x65-0x65) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp 00:08: io resource (0x72-0x77) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling
pnp: PnP ACPI: found 10 devices
ACPI: ACPI bus type pnp unregistered
PnPBIOS: Disabled by ACPI PNP
PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
pci 0000:00:1d.0: BAR 4: can't allocate resource
pci 0000:00:1d.1: BAR 4: can't allocate resource
ACPI: RTC can wake from S4
system 00:00: iomem range 0x0-0x9ffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0xe0000-0xeffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0xf0000-0xfffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0x100000-0x1ef3ffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0x1ef40000-0x1ef4ffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0x1ef50000-0x1effffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0xfec10000-0xfec1ffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0xfeda0000-0xfedbffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec00fff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee00fff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff could not be reserved
system 00:00: iomem range 0xffe80000-0xffffffff could not be reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0x1e0-0x1ef has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0x480-0x48f has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0x680-0x6ff has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xd800-0xd87f has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xd880-0xd89f has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xd8a0-0xd8bf has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xe000-0xe07f has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xe080-0xe0ff has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xe400-0xe47f has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xe480-0xe4ff has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xe800-0xe87f has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xe880-0xe8ff has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xec00-0xec7f has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xec80-0xecff has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xeeac-0xeeac has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xeeb0-0xeebf has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0xeec0-0xeeff has been reserved
system 00:08: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
pci 0000:01:0b.0: BAR 9 too large: 0x00000000000000-0x00000003ffffff
pci 0000:01:0b.0: CardBus bridge, secondary bus 0000:02
pci 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c000-0x00c0ff
pci 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c400-0x00c4ff
pci 0000:01:0b.0: MEM window: 0x2c000000-0x2fffffff
pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:01
pci 0000:00:1e.0: IO window: 0xc000-0xcfff
pci 0000:00:1e.0: MEM window: 0xcff00000-0xcfffffff
pci 0000:00:1e.0: PREFETCH window: disabled
pci 0000:00:1e.0: setting latency timer to 64
pci 0000:01:0b.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
pci 0000:01:0b.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
bus: 00 index 0 io port: [ffff00000000, de45d000]
bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [ffffffff00000000, de45d000]
bus: 01 index 0 io port: [cfff0000c000, de45d014de545c00]
bus: 01 index 1 mmio: [cfffffffcff00000, de45d014de545c00]
bus: 01 index 2 mmio: [0, de45d014de545c00]
bus: 01 index 3 io port: [ffff00000000, de45d014de545c00]
bus: 01 index 4 mmio: [ffffffff00000000, de45d014de545c00]
bus: 02 index 0 io port: [c0ff0000c000, de4dba14de546400]
bus: 02 index 1 io port: [c4ff0000c400, de4dba14de546400]
bus: 02 index 2 mmio: [3ffffff00000000, de4dba14de546400]
bus: 02 index 3 mmio: [2fffffff2c000000, de4dba14de546400]
NET: Registered protocol family 2
IP route cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
TCP established hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
TCP bind hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 16384)
TCP reno registered
NET: Registered protocol family 1
checking if image is initramfs... it is
Freeing initrd memory: 3576k freed
Simple Boot Flag at 0x7c set to 0x1
audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled)
type=2000 audit(1220120867.424:1): initialized
VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1
Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes)
msgmni has been set to 974
io scheduler noop registered
io scheduler anticipatory registered
io scheduler deadline registered
io scheduler cfq registered (default)
pci 0000:00:02.0: Boot video device
pci 0000:01:08.0: Firmware left e100 interrupts enabled; disabling
vesafb: framebuffer at 0xd8000000, mapped to 0xdf880000, using 3072k, total 16192k
vesafb: mode is 1024x768x16, linelength=2048, pages=9
vesafb: scrolling: redraw
vesafb: Truecolor: size=0:5:6:5, shift=0:11:5:0
Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48
fb0: VESA VGA frame buffer device
isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards...
Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0
isapnp: No Plug & Play device found
Serial: 8250/16550 driver4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
serial 0000:00:1f.6: power state changed by ACPI to D0
serial 0000:00:1f.6: enabling device (0000 -> 0001)
serial 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
serial 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B disabled
brd: module loaded
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.23-k4-NAPI
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation
e100 0000:01:08.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 20
e100: 0000:01:08.0: e100_probe: Error clearing wake event
e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xcffff000, irq 20, MAC addr 00:08:0d:17:bf:f5
console [netcon0] enabled
netconsole: network logging started
PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:KBC,PNP0f13:PS2M] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12
serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
cpuidle: using governor ladder
cpuidle: using governor menu
TCP bic registered
NET: Registered protocol family 17
Using IPI No-Shortcut mode
Freeing unused kernel memory: 232k freed
input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input0
ACPI: Transitioning device [FAN] to D3
fan PNP0C0B:00: registered as cooling_device0
ACPI: Fan [FAN] (off)
ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3])
processor ACPI0007:00: registered as cooling_device1
thermal LNXTHERM:01: registered as thermal_zone0
ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (60 C)
usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs
usbcore: registered new interface driver hub
usbcore: registered new device driver usb
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: PCI INT D -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 23
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: setting latency timer to 64
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: EHCI Host Controller
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: debug port 1
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: cache line size of 128 is not supported
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: irq 23, io mem 0x28080000
USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v3.0
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004
usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 1-0:1.0: 6 ports detected
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: setting latency timer to 64
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: UHCI Host Controller
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: irq 16, io base 0x000018c0
usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
Marking TSC unstable due to TSC halts in idle
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: setting latency timer to 64
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: UHCI Host Controller
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: irq 19, io base 0x000018e0
usb usb3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 3-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
piix 0000:00:1f.1: IDE controller (0x8086:0x24ca rev 0x03)
PIIX_IDE 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
piix 0000:00:1f.1: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xbfa0-0xbfa7
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xbfa8-0xbfaf
Probing IDE interface ide0...
hda: HTS541080G9AT00, ATA DISK drive
hda: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4
hda: UDMA/100 mode selected
Probing IDE interface ide1...
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -218654705 ns)
hdc: TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-R6112, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdc: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4
hdc: UDMA/33 mode selected
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
No dock devices found.
SCSI subsystem initialized
libata version 3.00 loaded.
hda: max request size: 512KiB
hda: 156301488 sectors (80026 MB) w/7539KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63
hda: cache flushes supported
hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4 < hda5 hda6 hda7 >
hdc: ATAPI 24X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
device-mapper: ioctl: 4.14.0-ioctl (2008-04-23) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
udevd version 125 started
input: PC Speaker as /class/input/input1
iTCO_wdt: Intel TCO WatchDog Timer Driver v1.03 (30-Apr-2008)
input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input2
ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF]
input: Lid Switch as /class/input/input3
Linux agpgart interface v0.103
ACPI: Lid Switch [LID]
input: Power Button (CM) as /class/input/input4
agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: Intel 855GM Chipset
agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: detected 16252K stolen memory
agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xd8000000
pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB]
ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present)
ACPI: AC Adapter [ADP1] (on-line)
shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
rtc_cmos 00:07: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
rtc0: alarms up to one year
Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: power state changed by ACPI to D0
Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: setting latency timer to 64
Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: power state changed by ACPI to D0
Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: setting latency timer to 64
acpi device:0f: registered as cooling_device2
input: Video Bus as /class/input/input5
ACPI: Video Device [VGA] (multi-head: yes rom: yes post: no)
input: PS/2 Mouse as /class/input/input6
input: AlpsPS/2 ALPS GlidePoint as /class/input/input7
iTCO_wdt: Found a ICH4-M TCO device (Version=1, TCOBASE=0xd860)
iTCO_wdt: initialized. heartbeat=30 sec (nowayout=0)
parport_pc 00:09: activated
parport_pc 00:09: reported by Plug and Play ACPI
parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 1 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA]
intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 55228 usecs
intel8x0: clocking to 48000
Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:01:0b.0 [1179:0001]
yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: CardBus bridge, secondary bus 0000:02
yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c000-0x00c0ff
yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c400-0x00c4ff
yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: PREFETCH window: 0x28400000-0x287fffff
yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: MEM window: 0x2c000000-0x2fffffff
Yenta: ISA IRQ mask 0x0c38, PCI irq 18
Socket status: 30000007
pcmcia: parent PCI bridge I/O window: 0xc000 - 0xcfff
cs: IO port probe 0xc000-0xcfff: clean.
pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0xcff00000 - 0xcfffffff
cs: IO port probe 0x100-0x3af: clean.
cs: IO port probe 0x3e0-0x4ff: clean.
cs: IO port probe 0x820-0x8ff: clean.
cs: IO port probe 0xc00-0xcf7: clean.
cs: IO port probe 0xa00-0xaff: clean.
EXT3 FS on dm-1, internal journal
padlock: VIA PadLock not detected.
padlock: VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected.
loop: module loaded
NET: Registered protocol family 10
lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions
toshiba_acpi: Toshiba Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.18
toshiba_acpi: HCI method: \_SB_.VALZ.GHCI
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-7, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-5, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-2, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-3, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on hda2, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on hda3, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
Adding 1048568k swap on /dev/mapper/strider-swap_crypt. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1048568k
lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven).
ppdev: user-space parallel port driver
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
[-- Attachment #3: config --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 61913 bytes --]
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.27-rc5
# Sat Aug 30 20:03:07 2008
#
# CONFIG_64BIT is not set
CONFIG_X86_32=y
# CONFIG_X86_64 is not set
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig"
# CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is not set
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y
CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST=y
CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_FAST_CMPXCHG_LOCAL=y
CONFIG_MMU=y
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_HWEIGHT=y
# CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC=y
# CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK is not set
CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y
# CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U32 is not set
# CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U64 is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_IDLE_WAIT=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY=y
# CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX=y
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CACHE_LINE_SIZE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA=y
# CONFIG_HAVE_CPUMASK_OF_CPU_MAP is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE=y
CONFIG_ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE=y
# CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP=y
# CONFIG_AUDIT_ARCH is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT=y
CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ=y
CONFIG_X86_SMP=y
CONFIG_X86_32_SMP=y
CONFIG_X86_HT=y
CONFIG_X86_BIOS_REBOOT=y
CONFIG_X86_TRAMPOLINE=y
CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR=y
CONFIG_DEFCONFIG_LIST="/lib/modules/$UNAME_RELEASE/.config"
#
# General setup
#
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y
CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=""
# CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not set
CONFIG_SWAP=y
CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y
CONFIG_SYSVIPC_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y
CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y
CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3=y
# CONFIG_TASKSTATS is not set
CONFIG_AUDIT=y
# CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL is not set
# CONFIG_IKCONFIG is not set
CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=15
# CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK=y
# CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED is not set
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y
# CONFIG_RELAY is not set
CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y
# CONFIG_UTS_NS is not set
# CONFIG_IPC_NS is not set
# CONFIG_USER_NS is not set
# CONFIG_PID_NS is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y
CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=""
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y
CONFIG_SYSCTL=y
# CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not set
CONFIG_UID16=y
CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL=y
CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y
CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y
# CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set
CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y
CONFIG_PRINTK=y
CONFIG_BUG=y
CONFIG_ELF_CORE=y
CONFIG_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y
# CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set
CONFIG_BASE_FULL=y
CONFIG_FUTEX=y
CONFIG_ANON_INODES=y
CONFIG_EPOLL=y
CONFIG_SIGNALFD=y
CONFIG_TIMERFD=y
CONFIG_EVENTFD=y
CONFIG_SHMEM=y
CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS=y
CONFIG_SLAB=y
# CONFIG_SLUB is not set
# CONFIG_SLOB is not set
# CONFIG_PROFILING is not set
# CONFIG_MARKERS is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_OPROFILE=y
# CONFIG_KPROBES is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y
CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT=y
CONFIG_HAVE_KPROBES=y
CONFIG_HAVE_KRETPROBES=y
# CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK is not set
# CONFIG_HAVE_DMA_ATTRS is not set
CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS=y
# CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not set
CONFIG_PROC_PAGE_MONITOR=y
CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT=y
CONFIG_SLABINFO=y
CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=y
# CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set
CONFIG_BASE_SMALL=0
CONFIG_MODULES=y
# CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_LOAD is not set
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD=y
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y
# CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL is not set
CONFIG_KMOD=y
CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE=y
CONFIG_BLOCK=y
CONFIG_LBD=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE is not set
CONFIG_LSF=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY is not set
#
# IO Schedulers
#
CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=y
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_AS is not set
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEADLINE is not set
CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_NOOP is not set
CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="cfq"
CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
#
# Processor type and features
#
CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BUILD=y
CONFIG_SMP=y
CONFIG_X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG=y
CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE=y
CONFIG_X86_PC=y
# CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set
# CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER is not set
# CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is not set
# CONFIG_X86_VSMP is not set
# CONFIG_X86_RDC321X is not set
CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER=y
# CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST is not set
# CONFIG_MEMTEST is not set
# CONFIG_M386 is not set
# CONFIG_M486 is not set
# CONFIG_M586 is not set
# CONFIG_M586TSC is not set
# CONFIG_M586MMX is not set
CONFIG_M686=y
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set
# CONFIG_MK6 is not set
# CONFIG_MK7 is not set
# CONFIG_MK8 is not set
# CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set
# CONFIG_MEFFICEON is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIP2 is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set
# CONFIG_MGEODEGX1 is not set
# CONFIG_MGEODE_LX is not set
# CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set
# CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set
# CONFIG_MVIAC7 is not set
# CONFIG_MPSC is not set
# CONFIG_MCORE2 is not set
# CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU is not set
# CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is not set
CONFIG_X86_CPU=y
CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y
CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=5
CONFIG_X86_XADD=y
CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE=y
CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y
CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y
CONFIG_X86_P6_NOP=y
CONFIG_X86_TSC=y
CONFIG_X86_CMOV=y
CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY=6
CONFIG_X86_DEBUGCTLMSR=y
CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y
CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y
CONFIG_DMI=y
# CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER is not set
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8
CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_MCE=y
CONFIG_X86_MCE_NONFATAL=m
CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL=y
CONFIG_VM86=y
CONFIG_TOSHIBA=m
# CONFIG_I8K is not set
# CONFIG_X86_REBOOTFIXUPS is not set
CONFIG_MICROCODE=m
CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE=y
CONFIG_X86_MSR=m
CONFIG_X86_CPUID=m
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC0000000
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
CONFIG_ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y
CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y
CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL=y
# CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set
# CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set
CONFIG_FLATMEM=y
CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_STATIC=y
# CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE is not set
CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED=y
CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS=4
# CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT is not set
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA_FLAG=1
CONFIG_BOUNCE=y
CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS=y
# CONFIG_HIGHPTE is not set
# CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set
CONFIG_MTRR=y
# CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER is not set
CONFIG_X86_PAT=y
# CONFIG_EFI is not set
# CONFIG_IRQBALANCE is not set
# CONFIG_SECCOMP is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set
CONFIG_HZ_250=y
# CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
CONFIG_HZ=250
CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK=y
CONFIG_KEXEC=y
# CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is not set
# CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP is not set
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x100000
# CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is not set
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x100000
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=y
CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y
#
# Power management options
#
CONFIG_PM=y
# CONFIG_PM_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP=y
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=y
CONFIG_SUSPEND=y
CONFIG_SUSPEND_FREEZER=y
CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y
CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION=""
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BAY=m
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
# CONFIG_ACPI_WMI is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA=m
# CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
# CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER=m
# CONFIG_ACPI_SBS is not set
# CONFIG_APM is not set
#
# CPU Frequency scaling
#
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=m
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=m
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_POWERSAVE is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=m
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=m
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=m
#
# CPUFreq processor drivers
#
CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=m
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K6=m
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K7=m
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K7_ACPI=y
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=m
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI=y
CONFIG_X86_GX_SUSPMOD=m
CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO=m
CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_TABLE=y
CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_ICH=m
CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_SMI=m
CONFIG_X86_P4_CLOCKMOD=m
CONFIG_X86_CPUFREQ_NFORCE2=m
CONFIG_X86_LONGRUN=m
CONFIG_X86_LONGHAUL=m
CONFIG_X86_E_POWERSAVER=m
#
# shared options
#
# CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF is not set
CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_LIB=m
CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_RELAXED_CAP_CHECK=y
CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y
CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_GOV_LADDER=y
CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_GOV_MENU=y
#
# Bus options (PCI etc.)
#
CONFIG_PCI=y
# CONFIG_PCI_GOBIOS is not set
# CONFIG_PCI_GOMMCONFIG is not set
# CONFIG_PCI_GODIRECT is not set
# CONFIG_PCI_GOOLPC is not set
CONFIG_PCI_GOANY=y
CONFIG_PCI_BIOS=y
CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT=y
CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG=y
CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS=y
# CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI=y
CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y
CONFIG_PCI_LEGACY=y
# CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_HT_IRQ=y
CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API=y
CONFIG_ISA=y
# CONFIG_EISA is not set
# CONFIG_MCA is not set
# CONFIG_SCx200 is not set
# CONFIG_OLPC is not set
CONFIG_PCCARD=m
# CONFIG_PCMCIA_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_PCMCIA=m
CONFIG_PCMCIA_LOAD_CIS=y
CONFIG_PCMCIA_IOCTL=y
CONFIG_CARDBUS=y
#
# PC-card bridges
#
CONFIG_YENTA=m
CONFIG_YENTA_O2=y
CONFIG_YENTA_RICOH=y
CONFIG_YENTA_TI=y
CONFIG_YENTA_ENE_TUNE=y
CONFIG_YENTA_TOSHIBA=y
CONFIG_PD6729=m
CONFIG_I82092=m
CONFIG_I82365=m
CONFIG_TCIC=m
CONFIG_PCMCIA_PROBE=y
CONFIG_PCCARD_NONSTATIC=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_FAKE=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ=m
# CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ_NVRAM is not set
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_IBM=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI_IBM=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_CPCI=y
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_CPCI_ZT5550=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_CPCI_GENERIC=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC=m
#
# Executable file formats / Emulations
#
CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y
CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT=m
CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=m
CONFIG_NET=y
#
# Networking options
#
CONFIG_PACKET=y
CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP=y
CONFIG_UNIX=y
CONFIG_XFRM=y
CONFIG_XFRM_USER=m
# CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY is not set
# CONFIG_XFRM_MIGRATE is not set
# CONFIG_XFRM_STATISTICS is not set
CONFIG_XFRM_IPCOMP=m
CONFIG_NET_KEY=m
# CONFIG_NET_KEY_MIGRATE is not set
CONFIG_INET=y
CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y
CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y
CONFIG_ASK_IP_FIB_HASH=y
# CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE is not set
CONFIG_IP_FIB_HASH=y
CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y
# CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set
CONFIG_NET_IPIP=m
CONFIG_NET_IPGRE=m
CONFIG_NET_IPGRE_BROADCAST=y
CONFIG_IP_MROUTE=y
CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V1=y
CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V2=y
# CONFIG_ARPD is not set
CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y
CONFIG_INET_AH=m
CONFIG_INET_ESP=m
CONFIG_INET_IPCOMP=m
CONFIG_INET_XFRM_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT=m
CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_BEET=m
CONFIG_INET_LRO=m
CONFIG_INET_DIAG=m
CONFIG_INET_TCP_DIAG=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_ADVANCED=y
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BIC=y
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_CUBIC=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_WESTWOOD=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_HTCP=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_HSTCP=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_HYBLA=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_VEGAS=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_SCALABLE=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_LP=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_VENO=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_YEAH=m
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_ILLINOIS=m
CONFIG_DEFAULT_BIC=y
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_CUBIC is not set
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_HTCP is not set
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_VEGAS is not set
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_WESTWOOD is not set
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_RENO is not set
CONFIG_DEFAULT_TCP_CONG="bic"
# CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG is not set
CONFIG_IP_VS=m
# CONFIG_IP_VS_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS=12
#
# IPVS transport protocol load balancing support
#
CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_TCP=y
CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_UDP=y
CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_ESP=y
CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_AH=y
#
# IPVS scheduler
#
CONFIG_IP_VS_RR=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_WRR=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_LC=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_WLC=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_LBLC=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_LBLCR=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_DH=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_SH=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_SED=m
CONFIG_IP_VS_NQ=m
#
# IPVS application helper
#
CONFIG_IP_VS_FTP=m
CONFIG_IPV6=m
CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY=y
# CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF is not set
# CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD is not set
CONFIG_INET6_AH=m
CONFIG_INET6_ESP=m
CONFIG_INET6_IPCOMP=m
# CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6 is not set
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET6_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT=m
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_BEET=m
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION=m
CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=m
CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE=y
CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=m
# CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES is not set
# CONFIG_IPV6_MROUTE is not set
# CONFIG_NETLABEL is not set
CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER=y
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_ADVANCED is not set
#
# Core Netfilter Configuration
#
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_LOG=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK=y
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_FTP=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IRC=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SIP=m
CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_MARK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_NFLOG=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_SECMARK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CONNSECMARK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TCPMSS=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_POLICY=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATE=m
#
# IP: Netfilter Configuration
#
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROC_COMPAT=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_LOG=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_ULOG=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT_FTP=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT_IRC=m
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_TFTP is not set
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_AMANDA is not set
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_PPTP is not set
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_H323 is not set
CONFIG_NF_NAT_SIP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MANGLE=m
#
# IPv6: Netfilter Configuration
#
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_IPV6HEADER=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_FILTER=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_LOG=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_MANGLE=m
# CONFIG_IP_DCCP is not set
CONFIG_IP_SCTP=m
# CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_MSG is not set
# CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT is not set
# CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_NONE is not set
# CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_SHA1 is not set
CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_MD5=y
# CONFIG_TIPC is not set
# CONFIG_ATM is not set
CONFIG_STP=m
CONFIG_BRIDGE=m
CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q=m
# CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_GVRP is not set
# CONFIG_DECNET is not set
CONFIG_LLC=m
CONFIG_LLC2=m
# CONFIG_IPX is not set
# CONFIG_ATALK is not set
# CONFIG_X25 is not set
# CONFIG_LAPB is not set
# CONFIG_ECONET is not set
# CONFIG_WAN_ROUTER is not set
CONFIG_NET_SCHED=y
#
# Queueing/Scheduling
#
CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBQ=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_HFSC=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_PRIO=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_RED=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_SFQ=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_TEQL=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_TBF=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_GRED=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_DSMARK=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_NETEM=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS=m
#
# Classification
#
CONFIG_NET_CLS=y
CONFIG_NET_CLS_BASIC=m
CONFIG_NET_CLS_TCINDEX=m
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE4=m
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE=y
CONFIG_NET_CLS_FW=m
CONFIG_NET_CLS_U32=m
CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF=y
CONFIG_CLS_U32_MARK=y
CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP=m
CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP6=m
CONFIG_NET_CLS_FLOW=m
CONFIG_NET_EMATCH=y
CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_STACK=32
CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP=m
CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_NBYTE=m
CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_U32=m
CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_META=m
CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_TEXT=m
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT=y
CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE=m
CONFIG_NET_ACT_GACT=m
CONFIG_GACT_PROB=y
CONFIG_NET_ACT_MIRRED=m
CONFIG_NET_ACT_IPT=m
CONFIG_NET_ACT_NAT=m
CONFIG_NET_ACT_PEDIT=m
CONFIG_NET_ACT_SIMP=m
CONFIG_NET_CLS_IND=y
CONFIG_NET_SCH_FIFO=y
#
# Network testing
#
CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN=m
# CONFIG_HAMRADIO is not set
# CONFIG_CAN is not set
# CONFIG_IRDA is not set
# CONFIG_BT is not set
CONFIG_AF_RXRPC=m
# CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_RXKAD=m
CONFIG_FIB_RULES=y
#
# Wireless
#
CONFIG_CFG80211=m
CONFIG_NL80211=y
CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT=y
CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_MAC80211=m
#
# Rate control algorithm selection
#
CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_PID=y
CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_PID=y
CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT="pid"
# CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH is not set
CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS=y
# CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS is not set
# CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUG_MENU is not set
# CONFIG_IEEE80211 is not set
CONFIG_RFKILL=m
CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT=m
CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS=y
# CONFIG_NET_9P is not set
#
# Device Drivers
#
#
# Generic Driver Options
#
CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH="/sbin/hotplug"
CONFIG_STANDALONE=y
CONFIG_PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD=y
CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y
CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE=""
# CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_DEVRES is not set
# CONFIG_SYS_HYPERVISOR is not set
CONFIG_CONNECTOR=m
CONFIG_MTD=m
# CONFIG_MTD_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_MTD_CONCAT=m
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS=y
CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS=m
CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_DIRECTORY_BLOCK=-1
# CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_UNALLOCATED is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_READONLY is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_AR7_PARTS is not set
#
# User Modules And Translation Layers
#
CONFIG_MTD_CHAR=m
CONFIG_MTD_BLKDEVS=m
CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK=m
CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK_RO=m
CONFIG_FTL=m
CONFIG_NFTL=m
CONFIG_NFTL_RW=y
CONFIG_INFTL=m
CONFIG_RFD_FTL=m
CONFIG_SSFDC=m
# CONFIG_MTD_OOPS is not set
#
# RAM/ROM/Flash chip drivers
#
CONFIG_MTD_CFI=m
CONFIG_MTD_JEDECPROBE=m
CONFIG_MTD_GEN_PROBE=m
# CONFIG_MTD_CFI_ADV_OPTIONS is not set
CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_1=y
CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_2=y
CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_4=y
# CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_8 is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_16 is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_32 is not set
CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I1=y
CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I2=y
# CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I4 is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I8 is not set
CONFIG_MTD_CFI_INTELEXT=m
CONFIG_MTD_CFI_AMDSTD=m
CONFIG_MTD_CFI_STAA=m
CONFIG_MTD_CFI_UTIL=m
CONFIG_MTD_RAM=m
CONFIG_MTD_ROM=m
CONFIG_MTD_ABSENT=m
#
# Mapping drivers for chip access
#
CONFIG_MTD_COMPLEX_MAPPINGS=y
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP=m
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_START=0x8000000
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_LEN=0x4000000
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_BANKWIDTH=2
CONFIG_MTD_SC520CDP=m
CONFIG_MTD_NETSC520=m
CONFIG_MTD_TS5500=m
CONFIG_MTD_SBC_GXX=m
# CONFIG_MTD_AMD76XROM is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_ICHXROM is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_ESB2ROM is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_CK804XROM is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_SCB2_FLASH is not set
CONFIG_MTD_NETtel=m
CONFIG_MTD_DILNETPC=m
CONFIG_MTD_DILNETPC_BOOTSIZE=0x80000
# CONFIG_MTD_L440GX is not set
CONFIG_MTD_PCI=m
# CONFIG_MTD_INTEL_VR_NOR is not set
CONFIG_MTD_PLATRAM=m
#
# Self-contained MTD device drivers
#
CONFIG_MTD_PMC551=m
# CONFIG_MTD_PMC551_BUGFIX is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_PMC551_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_MTD_SLRAM=m
CONFIG_MTD_PHRAM=m
CONFIG_MTD_MTDRAM=m
CONFIG_MTDRAM_TOTAL_SIZE=4096
CONFIG_MTDRAM_ERASE_SIZE=128
CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK2MTD=m
#
# Disk-On-Chip Device Drivers
#
CONFIG_MTD_DOC2000=m
CONFIG_MTD_DOC2001=m
CONFIG_MTD_DOC2001PLUS=m
CONFIG_MTD_DOCPROBE=m
CONFIG_MTD_DOCECC=m
# CONFIG_MTD_DOCPROBE_ADVANCED is not set
CONFIG_MTD_DOCPROBE_ADDRESS=0
CONFIG_MTD_NAND=m
# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SMC is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_MUSEUM_IDS is not set
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_IDS=m
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP=m
# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP_PROBE_ADVANCED is not set
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP_PROBE_ADDRESS=0
# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP_BBTWRITE is not set
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CAFE=m
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CS553X=m
# CONFIG_MTD_NAND_NANDSIM is not set
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_PLATFORM=m
# CONFIG_MTD_ALAUDA is not set
CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=m
CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_VERIFY_WRITE=y
# CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_OTP is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_2X_PROGRAM is not set
# CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_SIM is not set
#
# UBI - Unsorted block images
#
CONFIG_MTD_UBI=m
CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=4096
CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE=1
# CONFIG_MTD_UBI_GLUEBI is not set
#
# UBI debugging options
#
# CONFIG_MTD_UBI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_PARPORT=m
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=m
CONFIG_PARPORT_SERIAL=m
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO=y
# CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_SUPERIO is not set
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_PCMCIA=m
# CONFIG_PARPORT_GSC is not set
CONFIG_PARPORT_AX88796=m
CONFIG_PARPORT_1284=y
CONFIG_PARPORT_NOT_PC=y
CONFIG_PNP=y
# CONFIG_PNP_DEBUG is not set
#
# Protocols
#
CONFIG_ISAPNP=y
CONFIG_PNPBIOS=y
CONFIG_PNPBIOS_PROC_FS=y
CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_XD=m
# CONFIG_PARIDE is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_DA is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_CISS_DA is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UMEM is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_COW_COMMON is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CRYPTOLOOP=m
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NBD is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SX8 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_COUNT=16
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=8192
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_XIP is not set
CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD=m
CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD_BUFFERS=8
# CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD_WCACHE is not set
# CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD is not set
# CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_IDE=y
CONFIG_IDE=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE=m
#
# Please see Documentation/ide/ide.txt for help/info on IDE drives
#
CONFIG_IDE_TIMINGS=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDISK=m
# CONFIG_IDEDISK_MULTI_MODE is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DELKIN=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD_VERBOSE_ERRORS=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDETAPE is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEFLOPPY is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI is not set
# CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL is not set
CONFIG_IDE_PROC_FS=y
#
# IDE chipset support/bugfixes
#
CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PLATFORM=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640=m
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640_ENHANCED is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPNP=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_SFF=y
#
# PCI IDE chipsets support
#
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OFFBOARD is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_GENERIC=m
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OPTI621 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RZ1000 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AEC62XX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AMD74XX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ATIIXP is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD64X is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRIFLEX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CS5520 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CS5530 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CS5535 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT366 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_JMICRON is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SC1200 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PIIX=m
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT8213 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT821X is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NS87415 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SVWKS is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIIMAGE is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIS5513 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SLC90E66 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRM290 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TC86C001 is not set
#
# Other IDE chipsets support
#
#
# Note: most of these also require special kernel boot parameters
#
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_4DRIVES is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI14XX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DTC2278 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HT6560B is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_QD65XX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UMC8672 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
#
# SCSI device support
#
CONFIG_RAID_ATTRS=m
CONFIG_SCSI=m
CONFIG_SCSI_DMA=y
CONFIG_SCSI_TGT=m
CONFIG_SCSI_NETLINK=y
CONFIG_SCSI_PROC_FS=y
#
# SCSI support type (disk, tape, CD-ROM)
#
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=m
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_ST is not set
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_OSST is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR_VENDOR=y
CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG=m
CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SCH=m
#
# Some SCSI devices (e.g. CD jukebox) support multiple LUNs
#
CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN=y
CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS=y
CONFIG_SCSI_LOGGING=y
CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y
CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m
#
# SCSI Transports
#
CONFIG_SCSI_SPI_ATTRS=m
CONFIG_SCSI_FC_ATTRS=m
# CONFIG_SCSI_FC_TGT_ATTRS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_ISCSI_ATTRS is not set
CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATTRS=m
# CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_LIBSAS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SRP_ATTRS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_LOWLEVEL is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_LOWLEVEL_PCMCIA is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_DH is not set
CONFIG_ATA=m
# CONFIG_ATA_NONSTANDARD is not set
CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y
# CONFIG_SATA_PMP is not set
CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=m
# CONFIG_SATA_SIL24 is not set
CONFIG_ATA_SFF=y
# CONFIG_SATA_SVW is not set
CONFIG_ATA_PIIX=m
# CONFIG_SATA_MV is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_NV is not set
# CONFIG_PDC_ADMA is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_QSTOR is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_PROMISE is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_SX4 is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_SIL is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_ULI is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_VITESSE is not set
# CONFIG_SATA_INIC162X is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_ACPI is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_ALI is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_AMD is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_ARTOP is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_ATIIXP is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_CMD640_PCI is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_CMD64X is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_CS5520 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_CS5530 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_CS5535 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_CS5536 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_CYPRESS is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_EFAR is not set
CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC=m
# CONFIG_PATA_HPT366 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_HPT37X is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_HPT3X2N is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_HPT3X3 is not set
CONFIG_PATA_ISAPNP=m
# CONFIG_PATA_IT821X is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_IT8213 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_JMICRON is not set
CONFIG_PATA_LEGACY=m
# CONFIG_PATA_TRIFLEX is not set
CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL=m
# CONFIG_PATA_MPIIX is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_OLDPIIX is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_NETCELL is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_NINJA32 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_NS87410 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_NS87415 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_OPTI is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_OPTIDMA is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_PCMCIA is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_PDC_OLD is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_QDI is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_RADISYS is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_RZ1000 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_SC1200 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_SERVERWORKS is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_PDC2027X is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_SIL680 is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_WINBOND is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_WINBOND_VLB is not set
# CONFIG_PATA_SCH is not set
CONFIG_MD=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m
CONFIG_MD_LINEAR=m
CONFIG_MD_RAID0=m
CONFIG_MD_RAID1=m
CONFIG_MD_RAID10=m
CONFIG_MD_RAID456=m
CONFIG_MD_RAID5_RESHAPE=y
CONFIG_MD_MULTIPATH=m
CONFIG_MD_FAULTY=m
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=m
# CONFIG_DM_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_DM_CRYPT=m
CONFIG_DM_SNAPSHOT=m
CONFIG_DM_MIRROR=m
CONFIG_DM_ZERO=m
CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH=m
CONFIG_DM_DELAY=m
# CONFIG_DM_UEVENT is not set
CONFIG_FUSION=y
CONFIG_FUSION_SPI=m
CONFIG_FUSION_FC=m
CONFIG_FUSION_SAS=m
CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE=40
CONFIG_FUSION_CTL=m
# CONFIG_FUSION_LOGGING is not set
#
# IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support
#
#
# Enable only one of the two stacks, unless you know what you are doing
#
CONFIG_FIREWIRE=m
CONFIG_FIREWIRE_OHCI=m
CONFIG_FIREWIRE_OHCI_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_FIREWIRE_SBP2=m
# CONFIG_IEEE1394 is not set
CONFIG_I2O=m
CONFIG_I2O_LCT_NOTIFY_ON_CHANGES=y
CONFIG_I2O_EXT_ADAPTEC=y
CONFIG_I2O_CONFIG=m
CONFIG_I2O_CONFIG_OLD_IOCTL=y
CONFIG_I2O_BUS=m
CONFIG_I2O_BLOCK=m
CONFIG_I2O_SCSI=m
CONFIG_I2O_PROC=m
# CONFIG_MACINTOSH_DRIVERS is not set
CONFIG_NETDEVICES=y
CONFIG_IFB=m
CONFIG_DUMMY=m
CONFIG_BONDING=m
# CONFIG_MACVLAN is not set
CONFIG_EQUALIZER=m
CONFIG_TUN=m
CONFIG_VETH=m
# CONFIG_NET_SB1000 is not set
# CONFIG_ARCNET is not set
# CONFIG_PHYLIB is not set
CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y
CONFIG_MII=y
# CONFIG_HAPPYMEAL is not set
# CONFIG_SUNGEM is not set
# CONFIG_CASSINI is not set
# CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_3COM is not set
# CONFIG_LANCE is not set
# CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_SMC is not set
# CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_RACAL is not set
# CONFIG_NET_TULIP is not set
# CONFIG_AT1700 is not set
# CONFIG_DEPCA is not set
# CONFIG_HP100 is not set
# CONFIG_NET_ISA is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_ZMII is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_RGMII is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_TAH is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_EMAC4 is not set
CONFIG_NET_PCI=y
CONFIG_PCNET32=m
# CONFIG_AMD8111_ETH is not set
# CONFIG_ADAPTEC_STARFIRE is not set
# CONFIG_AC3200 is not set
# CONFIG_APRICOT is not set
# CONFIG_B44 is not set
# CONFIG_FORCEDETH is not set
# CONFIG_CS89x0 is not set
# CONFIG_EEPRO100 is not set
CONFIG_E100=y
# CONFIG_FEALNX is not set
# CONFIG_NATSEMI is not set
# CONFIG_NE2K_PCI is not set
# CONFIG_8139CP is not set
# CONFIG_8139TOO is not set
# CONFIG_R6040 is not set
# CONFIG_SIS900 is not set
# CONFIG_EPIC100 is not set
# CONFIG_SUNDANCE is not set
# CONFIG_TLAN is not set
# CONFIG_VIA_RHINE is not set
# CONFIG_SC92031 is not set
# CONFIG_NET_POCKET is not set
# CONFIG_NETDEV_1000 is not set
# CONFIG_NETDEV_10000 is not set
# CONFIG_TR is not set
#
# Wireless LAN
#
# CONFIG_WLAN_PRE80211 is not set
CONFIG_WLAN_80211=y
# CONFIG_PCMCIA_RAYCS is not set
# CONFIG_IPW2100 is not set
# CONFIG_IPW2200 is not set
# CONFIG_LIBERTAS is not set
# CONFIG_AIRO is not set
# CONFIG_HERMES is not set
# CONFIG_ATMEL is not set
# CONFIG_AIRO_CS is not set
# CONFIG_PCMCIA_WL3501 is not set
# CONFIG_PRISM54 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ZD1201 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_NET_RNDIS_WLAN is not set
# CONFIG_RTL8180 is not set
# CONFIG_RTL8187 is not set
# CONFIG_ADM8211 is not set
# CONFIG_MAC80211_HWSIM is not set
# CONFIG_P54_COMMON is not set
CONFIG_ATH5K=m
# CONFIG_ATH5K_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_ATH9K is not set
# CONFIG_IWLCORE is not set
# CONFIG_IWLWIFI_LEDS is not set
# CONFIG_IWLAGN is not set
# CONFIG_IWL3945 is not set
# CONFIG_HOSTAP is not set
# CONFIG_B43 is not set
# CONFIG_B43LEGACY is not set
# CONFIG_ZD1211RW is not set
# CONFIG_RT2X00 is not set
#
# USB Network Adapters
#
CONFIG_USB_CATC=m
CONFIG_USB_KAWETH=m
CONFIG_USB_PEGASUS=m
CONFIG_USB_RTL8150=m
CONFIG_USB_USBNET=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_AX8817X=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_CDCETHER=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_DM9601=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_GL620A=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_NET1080=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_PLUSB=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_MCS7830=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_RNDIS_HOST=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_CDC_SUBSET=m
CONFIG_USB_ALI_M5632=y
CONFIG_USB_AN2720=y
CONFIG_USB_BELKIN=y
CONFIG_USB_ARMLINUX=y
CONFIG_USB_EPSON2888=y
CONFIG_USB_KC2190=y
CONFIG_USB_NET_ZAURUS=m
# CONFIG_USB_HSO is not set
# CONFIG_NET_PCMCIA is not set
# CONFIG_WAN is not set
# CONFIG_FDDI is not set
# CONFIG_HIPPI is not set
CONFIG_PLIP=m
CONFIG_PPP=m
CONFIG_PPP_MULTILINK=y
CONFIG_PPP_FILTER=y
CONFIG_PPP_ASYNC=m
CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY=m
CONFIG_PPP_DEFLATE=m
CONFIG_PPP_BSDCOMP=m
CONFIG_PPP_MPPE=m
CONFIG_PPPOE=m
# CONFIG_PPPOL2TP is not set
CONFIG_SLIP=m
CONFIG_SLIP_COMPRESSED=y
CONFIG_SLHC=m
CONFIG_SLIP_SMART=y
CONFIG_SLIP_MODE_SLIP6=y
# CONFIG_NET_FC is not set
CONFIG_NETCONSOLE=y
CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC=y
CONFIG_NETPOLL=y
# CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP is not set
CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y
# CONFIG_ISDN is not set
# CONFIG_PHONE is not set
#
# Input device support
#
CONFIG_INPUT=y
CONFIG_INPUT_FF_MEMLESS=m
CONFIG_INPUT_POLLDEV=m
#
# Userland interfaces
#
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_PSAUX=y
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_X=1024
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_Y=768
CONFIG_INPUT_JOYDEV=m
CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV=m
# CONFIG_INPUT_EVBUG is not set
#
# Input Device Drivers
#
CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBOARD=y
CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD=y
CONFIG_KEYBOARD_SUNKBD=m
CONFIG_KEYBOARD_LKKBD=m
CONFIG_KEYBOARD_XTKBD=m
CONFIG_KEYBOARD_NEWTON=m
CONFIG_KEYBOARD_STOWAWAY=m
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSE=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2=m
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_ALPS=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_LOGIPS2PP=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_SYNAPTICS=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_LIFEBOOK=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TRACKPOINT=y
# CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TOUCHKIT is not set
CONFIG_MOUSE_SERIAL=m
CONFIG_MOUSE_APPLETOUCH=m
# CONFIG_MOUSE_BCM5974 is not set
CONFIG_MOUSE_INPORT=m
# CONFIG_MOUSE_ATIXL is not set
CONFIG_MOUSE_LOGIBM=m
CONFIG_MOUSE_PC110PAD=m
CONFIG_MOUSE_VSXXXAA=m
CONFIG_INPUT_JOYSTICK=y
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_ANALOG=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_A3D=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_ADI=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_COBRA=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GF2K=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GRIP=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GRIP_MP=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GUILLEMOT=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_INTERACT=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_SIDEWINDER=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_TMDC=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE_USB=y
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE_232=y
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_WARRIOR=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_MAGELLAN=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_SPACEORB=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_SPACEBALL=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_STINGER=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_TWIDJOY=m
# CONFIG_JOYSTICK_ZHENHUA is not set
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_DB9=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GAMECON=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_TURBOGRAFX=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_JOYDUMP=m
CONFIG_JOYSTICK_XPAD=m
# CONFIG_JOYSTICK_XPAD_FF is not set
# CONFIG_JOYSTICK_XPAD_LEDS is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_TABLET=y
CONFIG_TABLET_USB_ACECAD=m
CONFIG_TABLET_USB_AIPTEK=m
CONFIG_TABLET_USB_GTCO=m
CONFIG_TABLET_USB_KBTAB=m
CONFIG_TABLET_USB_WACOM=m
CONFIG_INPUT_TOUCHSCREEN=y
# CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_FUJITSU is not set
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_GUNZE=m
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_ELO=m
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MTOUCH=m
# CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_INEXIO is not set
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MK712=m
# CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_HTCPEN is not set
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_PENMOUNT=m
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TOUCHRIGHT=m
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TOUCHWIN=m
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1400=m
# CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_WM97XX is not set
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_COMPOSITE=m
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_EGALAX=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_PANJIT=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_3M=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_ITM=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_ETURBO=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_GUNZE=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_DMC_TSC10=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_IRTOUCH=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_IDEALTEK=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_GENERAL_TOUCH=y
CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_GOTOP=y
# CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TOUCHIT213 is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_MISC=y
CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR=m
# CONFIG_INPUT_APANEL is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_WISTRON_BTNS=m
CONFIG_INPUT_ATLAS_BTNS=m
CONFIG_INPUT_ATI_REMOTE=m
CONFIG_INPUT_ATI_REMOTE2=m
CONFIG_INPUT_KEYSPAN_REMOTE=m
CONFIG_INPUT_POWERMATE=m
CONFIG_INPUT_YEALINK=m
CONFIG_INPUT_UINPUT=m
#
# Hardware I/O ports
#
CONFIG_SERIO=y
CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y
CONFIG_SERIO_SERPORT=m
CONFIG_SERIO_CT82C710=m
CONFIG_SERIO_PARKBD=m
CONFIG_SERIO_PCIPS2=m
CONFIG_SERIO_LIBPS2=y
CONFIG_SERIO_RAW=m
CONFIG_GAMEPORT=m
CONFIG_GAMEPORT_NS558=m
CONFIG_GAMEPORT_L4=m
CONFIG_GAMEPORT_EMU10K1=m
CONFIG_GAMEPORT_FM801=m
#
# Character devices
#
CONFIG_VT=y
CONFIG_CONSOLE_TRANSLATIONS=y
CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_HW_CONSOLE=y
# CONFIG_VT_HW_CONSOLE_BINDING is not set
# CONFIG_DEVKMEM is not set
CONFIG_SERIAL_NONSTANDARD=y
# CONFIG_COMPUTONE is not set
# CONFIG_ROCKETPORT is not set
# CONFIG_CYCLADES is not set
# CONFIG_DIGIEPCA is not set
# CONFIG_ESPSERIAL is not set
# CONFIG_MOXA_INTELLIO is not set
# CONFIG_MOXA_SMARTIO is not set
# CONFIG_ISI is not set
# CONFIG_SYNCLINK is not set
# CONFIG_SYNCLINKMP is not set
# CONFIG_SYNCLINK_GT is not set
# CONFIG_N_HDLC is not set
# CONFIG_RISCOM8 is not set
# CONFIG_SPECIALIX is not set
# CONFIG_SX is not set
# CONFIG_RIO is not set
# CONFIG_STALDRV is not set
# CONFIG_NOZOMI is not set
#
# Serial drivers
#
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_FIX_EARLYCON_MEM=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PNP=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CS=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS=16
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RUNTIME_UARTS=4
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_EXTENDED=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_MANY_PORTS=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FOURPORT=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_ACCENT=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_BOCA=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_EXAR_ST16C554=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_HUB6=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_SHARE_IRQ=y
# CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DETECT_IRQ is not set
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RSA=y
#
# Non-8250 serial port support
#
CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_JSM=m
CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS=y
# CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS is not set
CONFIG_PRINTER=m
# CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE is not set
CONFIG_PPDEV=m
CONFIG_IPMI_HANDLER=m
# CONFIG_IPMI_PANIC_EVENT is not set
CONFIG_IPMI_DEVICE_INTERFACE=m
CONFIG_IPMI_SI=m
CONFIG_IPMI_WATCHDOG=m
CONFIG_IPMI_POWEROFF=m
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=y
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_INTEL=m
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_AMD=m
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_GEODE=m
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIA=m
CONFIG_NVRAM=m
# CONFIG_DTLK is not set
# CONFIG_R3964 is not set
CONFIG_APPLICOM=m
# CONFIG_SONYPI is not set
#
# PCMCIA character devices
#
# CONFIG_SYNCLINK_CS is not set
# CONFIG_CARDMAN_4000 is not set
# CONFIG_CARDMAN_4040 is not set
# CONFIG_IPWIRELESS is not set
# CONFIG_MWAVE is not set
# CONFIG_PC8736x_GPIO is not set
# CONFIG_NSC_GPIO is not set
# CONFIG_CS5535_GPIO is not set
CONFIG_RAW_DRIVER=m
CONFIG_MAX_RAW_DEVS=256
CONFIG_HPET=y
CONFIG_HPET_MMAP=y
CONFIG_HANGCHECK_TIMER=m
# CONFIG_TCG_TPM is not set
CONFIG_TELCLOCK=m
CONFIG_DEVPORT=y
CONFIG_I2C=m
CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO=y
CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=m
CONFIG_I2C_HELPER_AUTO=y
CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT=m
#
# I2C Hardware Bus support
#
#
# PC SMBus host controller drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_ALI1535 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ALI1563 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ALI15X3 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_AMD756 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_AMD8111 is not set
CONFIG_I2C_I801=m
# CONFIG_I2C_ISCH is not set
CONFIG_I2C_PIIX4=m
# CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS5595 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS630 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS96X is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_VIAPRO is not set
#
# I2C system bus drivers (mostly embedded / system-on-chip)
#
# CONFIG_I2C_OCORES is not set
CONFIG_I2C_SIMTEC=m
#
# External I2C/SMBus adapter drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_PARPORT is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_TAOS_EVM is not set
CONFIG_I2C_TINY_USB=m
#
# Graphics adapter I2C/DDC channel drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_VOODOO3 is not set
#
# Other I2C/SMBus bus drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_PCA_ISA is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_PCA_PLATFORM is not set
CONFIG_I2C_STUB=m
# CONFIG_SCx200_ACB is not set
#
# Miscellaneous I2C Chip support
#
# CONFIG_DS1682 is not set
# CONFIG_AT24 is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_EEPROM=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8574 is not set
# CONFIG_PCF8575 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_PCA9539 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8591 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX6875 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_TSL2550 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_ALGO is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_BUS is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CHIP is not set
# CONFIG_SPI is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB=y
# CONFIG_GPIOLIB is not set
# CONFIG_W1 is not set
CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY=y
# CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_PDA_POWER is not set
# CONFIG_BATTERY_DS2760 is not set
CONFIG_HWMON=y
CONFIG_HWMON_VID=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ABITUGURU=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ABITUGURU3 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7414 is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7418=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1021=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1025=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1026=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1029=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1031=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM9240=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7470=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7473 is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_K8TEMP=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ASB100=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ATXP1=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_DS1621=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_I5K_AMB=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_F71805F=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_F71882FG=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_F75375S=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_FSCHER=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_FSCPOS=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_FSCHMD=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_GL518SM=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_GL520SM=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_CORETEMP=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_IBMAEM is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_IBMPEX=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_IT87=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM63=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM77=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM78=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM80=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM83=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM85=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM87=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM90=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_LM92=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM93 is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX1619=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX6650=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87360=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87427=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_SIS5595=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_DME1737 is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47M1=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47M192=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47B397=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADS7828 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_THMC50 is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_VIA686A=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_VT1211=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_VT8231=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_W83791D=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_W83792D=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_W83793=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_W83L785TS=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83L786NG is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_W83627HF=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_W83627EHF=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_HDAPS=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_APPLESMC=m
# CONFIG_HWMON_DEBUG_CHIP is not set
CONFIG_THERMAL=y
CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON=y
CONFIG_WATCHDOG=y
# CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT is not set
#
# Watchdog Device Drivers
#
CONFIG_SOFT_WATCHDOG=m
CONFIG_ACQUIRE_WDT=m
CONFIG_ADVANTECH_WDT=m
# CONFIG_ALIM1535_WDT is not set
# CONFIG_ALIM7101_WDT is not set
# CONFIG_SC520_WDT is not set
# CONFIG_EUROTECH_WDT is not set
CONFIG_IB700_WDT=m
# CONFIG_IBMASR is not set
# CONFIG_WAFER_WDT is not set
CONFIG_I6300ESB_WDT=m
CONFIG_ITCO_WDT=m
# CONFIG_ITCO_VENDOR_SUPPORT is not set
# CONFIG_IT8712F_WDT is not set
# CONFIG_HP_WATCHDOG is not set
CONFIG_SC1200_WDT=m
CONFIG_PC87413_WDT=m
CONFIG_60XX_WDT=m
CONFIG_SBC8360_WDT=m
# CONFIG_SBC7240_WDT is not set
# CONFIG_CPU5_WDT is not set
CONFIG_SMSC37B787_WDT=m
CONFIG_W83627HF_WDT=m
CONFIG_W83697HF_WDT=m
CONFIG_W83877F_WDT=m
CONFIG_W83977F_WDT=m
# CONFIG_MACHZ_WDT is not set
# CONFIG_SBC_EPX_C3_WATCHDOG is not set
#
# ISA-based Watchdog Cards
#
# CONFIG_PCWATCHDOG is not set
# CONFIG_MIXCOMWD is not set
# CONFIG_WDT is not set
#
# PCI-based Watchdog Cards
#
# CONFIG_PCIPCWATCHDOG is not set
# CONFIG_WDTPCI is not set
#
# USB-based Watchdog Cards
#
# CONFIG_USBPCWATCHDOG is not set
#
# Sonics Silicon Backplane
#
CONFIG_SSB_POSSIBLE=y
# CONFIG_SSB is not set
#
# Multifunction device drivers
#
# CONFIG_MFD_CORE is not set
# CONFIG_MFD_SM501 is not set
# CONFIG_HTC_PASIC3 is not set
# CONFIG_MFD_TMIO is not set
#
# Multimedia devices
#
#
# Multimedia core support
#
# CONFIG_VIDEO_DEV is not set
# CONFIG_DVB_CORE is not set
# CONFIG_VIDEO_MEDIA is not set
#
# Multimedia drivers
#
# CONFIG_DAB is not set
#
# Graphics support
#
CONFIG_AGP=m
# CONFIG_AGP_ALI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_ATI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD64 is not set
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=m
# CONFIG_AGP_NVIDIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SWORKS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_EFFICEON is not set
CONFIG_DRM=m
# CONFIG_DRM_TDFX is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_R128 is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_RADEON is not set
CONFIG_DRM_I810=m
CONFIG_DRM_I830=m
CONFIG_DRM_I915=m
# CONFIG_DRM_MGA is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_SAVAGE is not set
CONFIG_VGASTATE=m
CONFIG_VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL=m
CONFIG_FB=y
CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y
CONFIG_FB_DDC=m
CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y
# CONFIG_FB_CFB_REV_PIXELS_IN_BYTE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SYS_FILLRECT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SYS_COPYAREA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_FOREIGN_ENDIAN is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SYS_FOPS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SVGALIB is not set
# CONFIG_FB_MACMODES is not set
# CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT is not set
CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y
CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y
#
# Frame buffer hardware drivers
#
# CONFIG_FB_CIRRUS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_PM2 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CYBER2000 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ARC is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ASILIANT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_IMSTT is not set
CONFIG_FB_VGA16=m
# CONFIG_FB_UVESA is not set
CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
# CONFIG_FB_EFI is not set
# CONFIG_FB_N411 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_HGA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_S1D13XXX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_RIVA is not set
CONFIG_FB_I810=m
# CONFIG_FB_I810_GTF is not set
# CONFIG_FB_LE80578 is not set
CONFIG_FB_INTEL=m
# CONFIG_FB_INTEL_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_FB_INTEL_I2C=y
# CONFIG_FB_MATROX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_RADEON is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ATY128 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ATY is not set
# CONFIG_FB_S3 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SAVAGE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_NEOMAGIC is not set
# CONFIG_FB_KYRO is not set
# CONFIG_FB_3DFX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VOODOO1 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VT8623 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CYBLA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_TRIDENT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ARK is not set
# CONFIG_FB_PM3 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CARMINE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_GEODE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VIRTUAL is not set
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT=y
# CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE is not set
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=y
# CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CORGI is not set
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_PROGEAR=m
# CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_MBP_NVIDIA is not set
#
# Display device support
#
CONFIG_DISPLAY_SUPPORT=m
#
# Display hardware drivers
#
#
# Console display driver support
#
CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y
# CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK is not set
CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT=y
CONFIG_MDA_CONSOLE=m
CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y
# CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DETECT_PRIMARY is not set
CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_ROTATION=y
# CONFIG_FONTS is not set
CONFIG_FONT_8x8=y
CONFIG_FONT_8x16=y
# CONFIG_LOGO is not set
CONFIG_SOUND=m
CONFIG_SND=m
CONFIG_SND_TIMER=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM=m
CONFIG_SND_RAWMIDI=m
CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER=m
CONFIG_SND_SEQ_DUMMY=m
CONFIG_SND_OSSEMUL=y
CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS_PLUGINS=y
CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER_OSS=y
# CONFIG_SND_DYNAMIC_MINORS is not set
CONFIG_SND_SUPPORT_OLD_API=y
CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PROCFS=y
# CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK is not set
# CONFIG_SND_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_SND_VMASTER=y
CONFIG_SND_MPU401_UART=m
CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m
CONFIG_SND_DRIVERS=y
# CONFIG_SND_PCSP is not set
CONFIG_SND_DUMMY=m
CONFIG_SND_VIRMIDI=m
CONFIG_SND_MTPAV=m
CONFIG_SND_MTS64=m
CONFIG_SND_SERIAL_U16550=m
CONFIG_SND_MPU401=m
CONFIG_SND_PORTMAN2X4=m
CONFIG_SND_AC97_POWER_SAVE=y
CONFIG_SND_AC97_POWER_SAVE_DEFAULT=0
# CONFIG_SND_ISA is not set
CONFIG_SND_PCI=y
# CONFIG_SND_AD1889 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ALS300 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ALS4000 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ALI5451 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ATIIXP is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ATIIXP_MODEM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8810 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8820 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8830 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AW2 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AZT3328 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_BT87X is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CA0106 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CMIPCI is not set
# CONFIG_SND_OXYGEN is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS4281 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS46XX is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS5530 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS5535AUDIO is not set
# CONFIG_SND_DARLA20 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_GINA20 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_LAYLA20 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_DARLA24 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_GINA24 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_LAYLA24 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MONA is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MIA is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ECHO3G is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INDIGO is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INDIGOIO is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INDIGODJ is not set
# CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1X is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ENS1370 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ENS1371 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ES1938 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ES1968 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_FM801 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDSP is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDSPM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HIFIER is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ICE1712 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ICE1724 is not set
CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0=m
CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0M=m
# CONFIG_SND_KORG1212 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MAESTRO3 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MIXART is not set
# CONFIG_SND_NM256 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_PCXHR is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RIPTIDE is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME32 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME96 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME9652 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SIS7019 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SONICVIBES is not set
# CONFIG_SND_TRIDENT is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX_MODEM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIRTUOSO is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VX222 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_YMFPCI is not set
# CONFIG_SND_USB is not set
# CONFIG_SND_PCMCIA is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SOC is not set
# CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME is not set
CONFIG_AC97_BUS=m
CONFIG_HID_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_HID=m
# CONFIG_HID_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_HIDRAW is not set
#
# USB Input Devices
#
CONFIG_USB_HID=m
CONFIG_USB_HIDINPUT_POWERBOOK=y
# CONFIG_HID_FF is not set
CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV=y
#
# USB HID Boot Protocol drivers
#
CONFIG_USB_KBD=m
CONFIG_USB_MOUSE=m
CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD=y
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI=y
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI=y
CONFIG_USB=m
# CONFIG_USB_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ANNOUNCE_NEW_DEVICES is not set
#
# Miscellaneous USB options
#
CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS=y
CONFIG_USB_DEVICE_CLASS=y
# CONFIG_USB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is not set
CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=y
# CONFIG_USB_OTG is not set
CONFIG_USB_MON=y
#
# USB Host Controller Drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_C67X00_HCD is not set
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=m
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT=y
# CONFIG_USB_EHCI_TT_NEWSCHED is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ISP116X_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ISP1760_HCD is not set
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD=m
# CONFIG_USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_DESC is not set
# CONFIG_USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_MMIO is not set
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_LITTLE_ENDIAN=y
CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD=m
# CONFIG_USB_SL811_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_R8A66597_HCD is not set
#
# Enable Host or Gadget support to see Inventra options
#
#
# USB Device Class drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_ACM is not set
CONFIG_USB_PRINTER=m
# CONFIG_USB_WDM is not set
#
# NOTE: USB_STORAGE enables SCSI, and 'SCSI disk support'
#
#
# may also be needed; see USB_STORAGE Help for more information
#
# CONFIG_USB_STORAGE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LIBUSUAL is not set
#
# USB Imaging devices
#
# CONFIG_USB_MDC800 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_MICROTEK is not set
#
# USB port drivers
#
CONFIG_USB_USS720=m
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL is not set
#
# USB Miscellaneous drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_EMI62 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_EMI26 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ADUTUX is not set
# CONFIG_USB_RIO500 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LEGOTOWER is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_BERRY_CHARGE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LED is not set
# CONFIG_USB_CYPRESS_CY7C63 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_CYTHERM is not set
# CONFIG_USB_PHIDGET is not set
# CONFIG_USB_IDMOUSE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_FTDI_ELAN is not set
# CONFIG_USB_APPLEDISPLAY is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SISUSBVGA is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_TRANCEVIBRATOR is not set
# CONFIG_USB_IOWARRIOR is not set
# CONFIG_USB_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ISIGHTFW is not set
# CONFIG_USB_GADGET is not set
# CONFIG_MMC is not set
# CONFIG_MEMSTICK is not set
CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y
CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=m
#
# LED drivers
#
# CONFIG_LEDS_PCA9532 is not set
# CONFIG_LEDS_CLEVO_MAIL is not set
# CONFIG_LEDS_PCA955X is not set
#
# LED Triggers
#
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=m
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_IDE_DISK=y
# CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT is not set
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=y
# CONFIG_ACCESSIBILITY is not set
# CONFIG_INFINIBAND is not set
# CONFIG_EDAC is not set
CONFIG_RTC_LIB=m
CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=m
#
# RTC interfaces
#
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_PROC=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV=y
# CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV_UIE_EMUL is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_TEST is not set
#
# I2C RTC drivers
#
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1374=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1672=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX6900=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RS5C372=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL1208=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_X1205=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8563=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8583=m
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M41T80 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_S35390A is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_FM3130 is not set
#
# SPI RTC drivers
#
#
# Platform RTC drivers
#
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS=m
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1511 is not set
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1553=m
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1742=m
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_STK17TA8 is not set
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M48T86=m
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M48T59 is not set
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_V3020=m
#
# on-CPU RTC drivers
#
# CONFIG_DMADEVICES is not set
# CONFIG_AUXDISPLAY is not set
# CONFIG_UIO is not set
#
# Firmware Drivers
#
CONFIG_EDD=m
# CONFIG_EDD_OFF is not set
CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP=y
CONFIG_DELL_RBU=m
CONFIG_DCDBAS=m
CONFIG_DMIID=y
# CONFIG_ISCSI_IBFT_FIND is not set
#
# File systems
#
CONFIG_EXT2_FS=m
CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y
# CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP is not set
CONFIG_EXT3_FS=m
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y
# CONFIG_EXT4DEV_FS is not set
CONFIG_JBD=m
# CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_FS_MBCACHE=m
# CONFIG_REISERFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_JFS_FS is not set
CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
# CONFIG_XFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_GFS2_FS is not set
# CONFIG_OCFS2_FS is not set
CONFIG_DNOTIFY=y
CONFIG_INOTIFY=y
CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER=y
CONFIG_QUOTA=y
# CONFIG_QUOTA_NETLINK_INTERFACE is not set
CONFIG_PRINT_QUOTA_WARNING=y
CONFIG_QFMT_V1=m
CONFIG_QFMT_V2=m
CONFIG_QUOTACTL=y
CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS=m
CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS=m
CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m
CONFIG_GENERIC_ACL=y
#
# CD-ROM/DVD Filesystems
#
CONFIG_ISO9660_FS=m
CONFIG_JOLIET=y
CONFIG_ZISOFS=y
CONFIG_UDF_FS=m
CONFIG_UDF_NLS=y
#
# DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems
#
CONFIG_FAT_FS=m
CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=m
CONFIG_VFAT_FS=m
CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_CODEPAGE=437
CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET="iso8859-1"
CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m
# CONFIG_NTFS_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y
#
# Pseudo filesystems
#
CONFIG_PROC_FS=y
CONFIG_PROC_KCORE=y
CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_TMPFS=y
CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL=y
# CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is not set
# CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set
CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS=y
#
# Miscellaneous filesystems
#
# CONFIG_ADFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_AFFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_ECRYPT_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_BEFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_BFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_JFFS2_FS is not set
# CONFIG_UBIFS_FS is not set
CONFIG_CRAMFS=y
# CONFIG_VXFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_MINIX_FS is not set
# CONFIG_OMFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HPFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_QNX4FS_FS is not set
CONFIG_ROMFS_FS=m
# CONFIG_SYSV_FS is not set
# CONFIG_UFS_FS is not set
CONFIG_NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS=y
CONFIG_NFS_FS=m
CONFIG_NFS_V3=y
CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y
CONFIG_NFS_V4=y
# CONFIG_NFSD is not set
CONFIG_LOCKD=m
CONFIG_LOCKD_V4=y
CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m
CONFIG_NFS_COMMON=y
CONFIG_SUNRPC=m
CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS=m
CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5=m
CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_SPKM3=m
# CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
CONFIG_CIFS=m
# CONFIG_CIFS_STATS is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not set
# CONFIG_NCP_FS is not set
# CONFIG_CODA_FS is not set
# CONFIG_AFS_FS is not set
#
# Partition Types
#
CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y
# CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_OSF_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_AMIGA_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_ATARI_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION is not set
CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION=y
# CONFIG_BSD_DISKLABEL is not set
# CONFIG_MINIX_SUBPARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_UNIXWARE_DISKLABEL is not set
CONFIG_LDM_PARTITION=y
# CONFIG_LDM_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_SGI_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_ULTRIX_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_SUN_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_KARMA_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_SYSV68_PARTITION is not set
CONFIG_NLS=y
CONFIG_NLS_DEFAULT="iso8859-1"
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_437=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_737=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_775=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_850=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_852=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_855=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_857=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_860=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_861=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_862=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_863=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_864=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_865=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_866=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_869=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_936=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_950=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_932=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_949=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_874=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_8=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1250=m
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1251=m
CONFIG_NLS_ASCII=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_1=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_2=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_3=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_4=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_5=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_6=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_7=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_9=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_13=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_14=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_15=m
CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_R=m
CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_U=m
CONFIG_NLS_UTF8=m
CONFIG_DLM=m
CONFIG_DLM_DEBUG=y
#
# Kernel hacking
#
CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=y
# CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME is not set
CONFIG_ENABLE_WARN_DEPRECATED=y
CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK=y
CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=1024
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
# CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ is not set
CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP=y
# CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC is not set
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE=0
CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y
CONFIG_TIMER_STATS=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES is not set
# CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is not set
# CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not set
# CONFIG_LOCK_STAT is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS is not set
CONFIG_STACKTRACE=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_WRITECOUNT is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SG is not set
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y
# CONFIG_BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY is not set
# CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION is not set
CONFIG_LATENCYTOP=y
CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL_CHECK=y
CONFIG_HAVE_FTRACE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y
# CONFIG_FTRACE is not set
# CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER is not set
# CONFIG_SYSPROF_TRACER is not set
# CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER is not set
# CONFIG_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER is not set
# CONFIG_PROVIDE_OHCI1394_DMA_INIT is not set
# CONFIG_FIREWIRE_OHCI_REMOTE_DMA is not set
# CONFIG_SAMPLES is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KGDB=y
# CONFIG_KGDB is not set
CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM=y
CONFIG_X86_VERBOSE_BOOTUP=y
CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is not set
# CONFIG_X86_PTDUMP is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_NX_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set
CONFIG_DOUBLEFAULT=y
# CONFIG_MMIOTRACE is not set
CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_0X80=0
CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_0XED=1
CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_UDELAY=2
CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_NONE=3
CONFIG_IO_DELAY_0X80=y
# CONFIG_IO_DELAY_0XED is not set
# CONFIG_IO_DELAY_UDELAY is not set
# CONFIG_IO_DELAY_NONE is not set
CONFIG_DEFAULT_IO_DELAY_TYPE=0
# CONFIG_DEBUG_BOOT_PARAMS is not set
# CONFIG_CPA_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is not set
#
# Security options
#
CONFIG_KEYS=y
# CONFIG_KEYS_DEBUG_PROC_KEYS is not set
CONFIG_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM=y
# CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES is not set
CONFIG_SECURITY_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR=0
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=0
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DEVELOP=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_AVC_STATS=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_CHECKREQPROT_VALUE=1
# CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_ENABLE_SECMARK_DEFAULT is not set
# CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_POLICYDB_VERSION_MAX is not set
CONFIG_XOR_BLOCKS=m
CONFIG_ASYNC_CORE=m
CONFIG_ASYNC_MEMCPY=m
CONFIG_ASYNC_XOR=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO=y
#
# Crypto core or helper
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ALGAPI=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEAD=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLKCIPHER=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_GF128MUL=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_NULL=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRYPTD is not set
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AUTHENC=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEST=m
#
# Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data
#
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_CCM is not set
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_GCM is not set
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_SEQIV is not set
#
# Block modes
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CBC=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_CTR is not set
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_CTS is not set
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ECB=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_LRW=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PCBC=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS=m
#
# Hash modes
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_XCBC=m
#
# Digest
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD4=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MICHAEL_MIC=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD128 is not set
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD160 is not set
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD256 is not set
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD320 is not set
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TGR192=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_WP512=m
#
# Ciphers
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_586=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ANUBIS=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARC4=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLOWFISH=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAMELLIA=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST5=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST6=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DES=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_FCRYPT=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_KHAZAD=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_SALSA20 is not set
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_SALSA20_586 is not set
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SEED=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SERPENT=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEA=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH_COMMON=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH_586=m
#
# Compression
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEFLATE=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZO is not set
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HW=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_AES=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_SHA=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_GEODE=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_HIFN_795X is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_KVM=y
# CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION is not set
#
# Library routines
#
CONFIG_BITREVERSE=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT=y
CONFIG_CRC_CCITT=m
CONFIG_CRC16=m
CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=m
CONFIG_CRC_ITU_T=m
CONFIG_CRC32=y
# CONFIG_CRC7 is not set
CONFIG_LIBCRC32C=m
CONFIG_AUDIT_GENERIC=y
CONFIG_ZLIB_INFLATE=y
CONFIG_ZLIB_DEFLATE=m
CONFIG_REED_SOLOMON=m
CONFIG_REED_SOLOMON_DEC16=y
CONFIG_TEXTSEARCH=y
CONFIG_TEXTSEARCH_KMP=m
CONFIG_TEXTSEARCH_BM=m
CONFIG_TEXTSEARCH_FSM=m
CONFIG_PLIST=y
CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM=y
CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT=y
CONFIG_HAS_DMA=y
CONFIG_CHECK_SIGNATURE=y
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread* Re: [bisected][resend] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages @ 2008-09-20 23:49 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-20 23:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2008-09-20 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Rene Herman, linux-kernel, Rene Herman, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Jesse Barnes [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1192 bytes --] On Thursday 18 September 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tuesday 09 September 2008 12:31:09 pm Rene Herman wrote: > > On 09-09-08 19:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > If the PCI device isn't fully initialized, it doesn't seem right to > > > check it for resource conflicts. But I don't know how to tell > > > that. > > > > His pci_resource_start() values are 0. How about just checking for > > that? > > Frans, can you test Rene's patch? I think it will solve the problem > you're seeing, and if so, we should put it in for 2.6.27. But I'd like > to have your "Tested-by" first. Tested against current git (v2.6.27-rc6-158-g9824b8f) and looks good. Attached the patch with Rene's Signed-off and my Tested-by for convenience. I had not tested earlier as you said you wanted to better understand the cause first. Did you get anything more about why things happen as they do from the info I sent? Attached also a dmesg diff for boots with the two different BIOS settings with this kernel (with Rene's patch having filtered out the "io resource overlap" messages). It still clearly shows the difference in how some devices get enabled and how their resources get assigned. Cheers, FJP [-- Attachment #2: quirk_system_pci_resources.diff --] [-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 745 bytes --] From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com> PNP: avoid checking unitialized BARs for conflicts Avoid checking a PCI BAR for conflicts if the BIOS left it unitialized. Reported-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Signed-off-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com> Tested-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> diff --git a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c index 0bdf9b8..d0120a5 100644 --- a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c +++ b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c @@ -253,6 +253,9 @@ static void quirk_system_pci_resources(struct pnp_dev *dev) continue; pci_start = pci_resource_start(pdev, i); + if (!pci_start) + continue; + pci_end = pci_resource_end(pdev, i); for (j = 0; (res = pnp_get_resource(dev, type, j)); j++) { [-- Attachment #3: dmesg.diff --] [-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 25197 bytes --] --- rc6_setup-by-os.dmesg 2008-09-21 01:12:27.000000000 +0200 +++ rc6_all-devices.dmesg 2008-09-21 01:28:00.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,472 +1,466 @@ Linux version 2.6.27-rc6 (root@faramir) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1) ) #12 SMP Sun Sep 21 01:04:33 CEST 2008 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000eee00 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000eee00 - 00000000000ef000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001ef40000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000001ef40000 - 000000001ef50000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 000000001ef50000 - 000000001f000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec10000 - 00000000fec20000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000feda0000 - 00000000fedc0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffb00000 - 00000000ffc00000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffe80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) PAT support disabled. last_pfn = 0x1ef40 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000 kernel direct mapping tables up to 1ef40000 @ 7000-d000 RAMDISK: 1ebb2000 - 1ef2faad DMI 2.3 present. ACPI: RSDP 000F0180, 0014 (r0 TOSHIB) -ACPI: RSDT 1EF40000, 0038 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) +ACPI: RSDT 1EF40000, 0034 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: FACP 1EF40060, 0084 (r2 TOSHIB 750 20030101 TASM 4010000) ACPI: DSDT 1EF40558, 4B72 (r1 TOSHIB A000C 20031216 MSFT 100000E) ACPI: FACS 000EEE00, 0040 ACPI: SSDT 1EF402CA, 0082 (r1 TOSHIB A000C 20030917 MSFT 100000E) ACPI: DBGP 1EF400E4, 0034 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) -ACPI: BOOT 1EF40038, 0028 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: APIC 1EF40118, 0062 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: DMI detected: Toshiba 0MB HIGHMEM available. 495MB LOWMEM available. mapped low ram: 0 - 1ef40000 low ram: 00000000 - 1ef40000 bootmap 00002000 - 00005de8 (9 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 001ef40000] #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000] #1 [0000001000 - 0000002000] EX TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000001000 - 0000002000] #2 [0000006000 - 0000007000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000007000] #3 [0000100000 - 00004561fc] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000100000 - 00004561fc] #4 [001ebb2000 - 001ef2faad] RAMDISK ==> [001ebb2000 - 001ef2faad] #5 [0000457000 - 000045a000] INIT_PG_TABLE ==> [0000457000 - 000045a000] #6 [000009fc00 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009fc00 - 0000100000] #7 [0000007000 - 0000009000] PGTABLE ==> [0000007000 - 0000009000] #8 [0000002000 - 0000006000] BOOTMAP ==> [0000002000 - 0000006000] Zone PFN ranges: DMA 0x00000000 -> 0x00001000 Normal 0x00001000 -> 0x0001ef40 HighMem 0x0001ef40 -> 0x0001ef40 Movable zone start PFN for each node early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges 0: 0x00000000 -> 0x0000009f 0: 0x00000100 -> 0x0001ef40 On node 0 totalpages: 126687 free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c0399200, node_mem_map c1000000 DMA zone: 3967 pages, LIFO batch:0 Normal zone: 121729 pages, LIFO batch:31 ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0xd808 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] disabled) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1]) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information SMP: Allowing 2 CPUs, 1 hotplug CPUs mapped APIC to ffffb000 (fee00000) mapped IOAPIC to ffffa000 (fec00000) PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000000009f000 - 00000000000a0000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000a0000 - 00000000000e0000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000ee000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000ee000 - 00000000000ef000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000 Allocating PCI resources starting at 20000000 (gap: 1f000000:dfc00000) PERCPU: Allocating 36828 bytes of per cpu data NR_CPUS: 8, nr_cpu_ids: 2, nr_node_ids 1 Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 125696 Kernel command line: root=/dev/mapper/strider-root nopat ro vga=791 quiet Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done. Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes) TSC: PIT calibration confirmed by PMTIMER. TSC: using PMTIMER calibration value -Detected 2792.987 MHz processor. +Detected 2792.990 MHz processor. Console: colour dummy device 80x25 console [tty0] enabled Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Memory: 495084k/507136k available (1765k kernel code, 11492k reserved, 955k data, 232k init, 0k highmem) virtual kernel memory layout: fixmap : 0xfff51000 - 0xfffff000 ( 696 kB) pkmap : 0xff800000 - 0xffc00000 (4096 kB) vmalloc : 0xdf800000 - 0xff7fe000 ( 511 MB) lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xdef40000 ( 495 MB) .init : 0xc03b1000 - 0xc03eb000 ( 232 kB) .data : 0xc02b94a2 - 0xc03a8208 ( 955 kB) .text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc02b94a2 (1765 kB) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok. CPA: page pool initialized 1 of 1 pages preallocated -Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 5585.97 BogoMIPS (lpj=11171948) +Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 5585.98 BogoMIPS (lpj=11171960) Security Framework initialized SELinux: Disabled at boot. Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K CPU: L2 cache: 512K CPU: Hyper-Threading is disabled Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU0: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (12) available CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. ACPI: Core revision 20080609 ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs ..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1 CPU0: Intel Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz stepping 09 Brought up 1 CPUs -Total of 1 processors activated (5585.97 BogoMIPS). +Total of 1 processors activated (5585.98 BogoMIPS). CPU0 attaching sched-domain: domain 0: span 0 level CPU groups: 0 net_namespace: 816 bytes NET: Registered protocol family 16 ACPI: bus type pci registered PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd2fe, last bus=3 PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT ACPI Warning (dsobject-0501): Package List length (F) larger than NumElements count (2), truncated [20080609] ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) PCI: 0000:00:02.0 reg 10 32bit mmio: [d8000000, dfffffff] PCI: 0000:00:02.0 reg 14 32bit mmio: [d0000000, d007ffff] PCI: 0000:00:02.0 reg 18 io port: [eff8, efff] pci 0000:00:02.0: supports D1 -PCI: 0000:00:02.1 reg 10 32bit mmio: [20000000, 27ffffff] -PCI: 0000:00:02.1 reg 14 32bit mmio: [2c000000, 2c07ffff] +PCI: 0000:00:02.1 reg 10 32bit mmio: [0, 7ffffff] +PCI: 0000:00:02.1 reg 14 32bit mmio: [0, 7ffff] pci 0000:00:02.1: supports D1 PCI: 0000:00:1d.0 reg 20 io port: [cfe0, cfff] PCI: 0000:00:1d.1 reg 20 io port: [cf80, cf9f] -PCI: 0000:00:1d.7 reg 10 32bit mmio: [0, 3ff] +PCI: 0000:00:1d.7 reg 10 32bit mmio: [cffffc00, cfffffff] pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# disabled HPET not enabled in BIOS. You might try hpet=force boot option pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region d800-d87f claimed by ICH4 ACPI/GPIO/TCO pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region eec0-eeff claimed by ICH4 GPIO PCI: 0000:00:1f.1 reg 10 io port: [bff8, bfff] PCI: 0000:00:1f.1 reg 14 io port: [bff4, bff7] PCI: 0000:00:1f.1 reg 18 io port: [bfe8, bfef] PCI: 0000:00:1f.1 reg 1c io port: [bfe4, bfe7] PCI: 0000:00:1f.1 reg 20 io port: [bfa0, bfaf] -PCI: 0000:00:1f.1 reg 24 32bit mmio: [2c080400, 2c0807ff] -PCI: 0000:00:1f.5 reg 10 io port: [0, ff] -PCI: 0000:00:1f.5 reg 14 io port: [0, 3f] -PCI: 0000:00:1f.5 reg 18 32bit mmio: [0, 1ff] -PCI: 0000:00:1f.5 reg 1c 32bit mmio: [0, ff] +PCI: 0000:00:1f.1 reg 24 32bit mmio: [0, 3ff] +PCI: 0000:00:1f.5 reg 10 io port: [be00, beff] +PCI: 0000:00:1f.5 reg 14 io port: [bdc0, bdff] +PCI: 0000:00:1f.5 reg 18 32bit mmio: [cfdffe00, cfdfffff] +PCI: 0000:00:1f.5 reg 1c 32bit mmio: [cfdffd00, cfdffdff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1f.5: PME# disabled -PCI: 0000:00:1f.6 reg 10 io port: [0, ff] -PCI: 0000:00:1f.6 reg 14 io port: [0, 7f] +PCI: 0000:00:1f.6 reg 10 io port: [ba00, baff] +PCI: 0000:00:1f.6 reg 14 io port: [b980, b9ff] pci 0000:00:1f.6: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1f.6: PME# disabled -PCI: 0000:01:08.0 reg 10 32bit mmio: [cffff000, cfffffff] +PCI: 0000:01:08.0 reg 10 32bit mmio: [cfeff000, cfefffff] PCI: 0000:01:08.0 reg 14 io port: [cf40, cf7f] pci 0000:01:08.0: supports D1 pci 0000:01:08.0: supports D2 pci 0000:01:08.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:01:08.0: PME# disabled PCI: 0000:01:0b.0 reg 10 32bit mmio: [0, fff] pci 0000:00:1e.0: transparent bridge PCI: bridge 0000:00:1e.0 io port: [c000, cfff] -PCI: bridge 0000:00:1e.0 32bit mmio: [cff00000, cfffffff] +PCI: bridge 0000:00:1e.0 32bit mmio: [cfe00000, cfefffff] bus 00 -> node 0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIB._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *10) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: Power Resource [PFAN] (off) Linux Plug and Play Support v0.97 (c) Adam Belay pnp: PnP ACPI init ACPI: bus type pnp registered pnp: PnP ACPI: found 10 devices ACPI: ACPI bus type pnp unregistered PnPBIOS: Disabled by ACPI PNP PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing pci 0000:00:1d.0: BAR 4: can't allocate resource pci 0000:00:1d.1: BAR 4: can't allocate resource ACPI: RTC can wake from S4 system 00:00: iomem range 0x0-0x9ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xe0000-0xeffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xf0000-0xfffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x100000-0x1ef3ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x1ef40000-0x1ef4ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x1ef50000-0x1effffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfec10000-0xfec1ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfeda0000-0xfedbffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec00fff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee00fff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xffe80000-0xffffffff could not be reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x1e0-0x1ef has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x480-0x48f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x680-0x6ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd800-0xd87f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd880-0xd89f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd8a0-0xd8bf has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe000-0xe07f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe080-0xe0ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe400-0xe47f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe480-0xe4ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe800-0xe87f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe880-0xe8ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xec00-0xec7f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xec80-0xecff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeeac-0xeeac has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeeb0-0xeebf has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeec0-0xeeff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved pci 0000:01:0b.0: CardBus bridge, secondary bus 0000:02 pci 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c000-0x00c0ff pci 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c400-0x00c4ff pci 0000:01:0b.0: PREFETCH window: 0x28000000-0x2bffffff pci 0000:01:0b.0: MEM window: 0x30000000-0x33ffffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:01 pci 0000:00:1e.0: IO window: 0xc000-0xcfff -pci 0000:00:1e.0: MEM window: 0xcff00000-0xcfffffff +pci 0000:00:1e.0: MEM window: 0xcfe00000-0xcfefffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: PREFETCH window: 0x00000028000000-0x0000002bffffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: setting latency timer to 64 pci 0000:01:0b.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) pci 0000:01:0b.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 bus: 00 index 0 io port: [0, ffff] bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [0, ffffffff] bus: 01 index 0 io port: [c000, cfff] -bus: 01 index 1 mmio: [cff00000, cfffffff] +bus: 01 index 1 mmio: [cfe00000, cfefffff] bus: 01 index 2 mmio: [28000000, 2bffffff] bus: 01 index 3 io port: [0, ffff] bus: 01 index 4 mmio: [0, ffffffff] bus: 02 index 0 io port: [c000, c0ff] bus: 02 index 1 io port: [c400, c4ff] bus: 02 index 2 mmio: [28000000, 2bffffff] bus: 02 index 3 mmio: [30000000, 33ffffff] NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP route cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) TCP established hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) TCP bind hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 16384) TCP reno registered NET: Registered protocol family 1 checking if image is initramfs... it is Freeing initrd memory: 3574k freed -Simple Boot Flag at 0x7c set to 0x1 audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled) -type=2000 audit(1221952098.428:1): initialized +type=2000 audit(1221953191.428:1): initialized VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1 Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes) msgmni has been set to 974 io scheduler noop registered io scheduler anticipatory registered io scheduler deadline registered io scheduler cfq registered (default) pci 0000:00:02.0: Boot video device pci 0000:01:08.0: Firmware left e100 interrupts enabled; disabling vesafb: framebuffer at 0xd8000000, mapped to 0xdf880000, using 3072k, total 16192k vesafb: mode is 1024x768x16, linelength=2048, pages=9 vesafb: scrolling: redraw vesafb: Truecolor: size=0:5:6:5, shift=0:11:5:0 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 fb0: VESA VGA frame buffer device isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards... Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0 isapnp: No Plug & Play device found Serial: 8250/16550 driver4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled serial 0000:00:1f.6: power state changed by ACPI to D0 -serial 0000:00:1f.6: enabling device (0000 -> 0001) serial 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 serial 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B disabled brd: module loaded e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.23-k4-NAPI e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation e100 0000:01:08.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 e100 0000:01:08.0: PME# disabled -e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xcffff000, irq 20, MAC addr 00:08:0d:17:bf:f5 +e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xcfeff000, irq 20, MAC addr 00:08:0d:17:bf:f5 console [netcon0] enabled netconsole: network logging started PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:KBC,PNP0f13:PS2M] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12 serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice cpuidle: using governor ladder cpuidle: using governor menu TCP bic registered NET: Registered protocol family 17 Using IPI No-Shortcut mode Freeing unused kernel memory: 232k freed input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input0 ACPI: Transitioning device [FAN] to D3 fan PNP0C0B:00: registered as cooling_device0 ACPI: Fan [FAN] (off) ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3]) processor ACPI0007:00: registered as cooling_device1 thermal LNXTHERM:01: registered as thermal_zone0 -ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (61 C) +ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (44 C) usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs usbcore: registered new interface driver hub usbcore: registered new device driver usb -ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: PCI INT D -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 23 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: setting latency timer to 64 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: EHCI Host Controller ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: debug port 1 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: cache line size of 128 is not supported -ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: irq 23, io mem 0x2c080000 +ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: irq 23, io mem 0xcffffc00 USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v3.0 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004 usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 1-0:1.0: 6 ports detected Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: setting latency timer to 64 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 -uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: irq 16, io base 0x000018c0 +uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: irq 16, io base 0x00001000 usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected Marking TSC unstable due to TSC halts in idle uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: setting latency timer to 64 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3 -uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: irq 19, io base 0x000018e0 +uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: irq 19, io base 0x00001020 usb usb3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 3-0:1.0: 2 ports detected piix 0000:00:1f.1: IDE controller (0x8086:0x24ca rev 0x03) PIIX_IDE 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 piix 0000:00:1f.1: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide0: BM-DMA at 0xbfa0-0xbfa7 ide1: BM-DMA at 0xbfa8-0xbfaf Probing IDE interface ide0... hda: HTS541080G9AT00, ATA DISK drive hda: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4 hda: UDMA/100 mode selected Probing IDE interface ide1... -Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -245158847 ns) +Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -239288271 ns) hdc: TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-R6112, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive hdc: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4 hdc: UDMA/33 mode selected ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 No dock devices found. SCSI subsystem initialized libata version 3.00 loaded. hda: max request size: 512KiB hda: 156301488 sectors (80026 MB) w/7539KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63 hda: cache flushes supported hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4 < hda5 hda6 hda7 > hdc: ATAPI 24X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 device-mapper: ioctl: 4.14.0-ioctl (2008-04-23) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. udevd version 125 started input: PC Speaker as /class/input/input1 -rtc_cmos 00:07: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 -rtc0: alarms up to one year Linux agpgart interface v0.103 agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: Intel 855GM Chipset agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: detected 16252K stolen memory agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xd8000000 -input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input2 -ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF] -input: Lid Switch as /class/input/input3 iTCO_wdt: Intel TCO WatchDog Timer Driver v1.03 (30-Apr-2008) iTCO_wdt: Found a ICH4-M TCO device (Version=1, TCOBASE=0xd860) iTCO_wdt: initialized. heartbeat=30 sec (nowayout=0) +pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5 +shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4 +rtc_cmos 00:07: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 +rtc0: alarms up to one year +input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input2 +ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF] +input: Lid Switch as /class/input/input3 ACPI: Lid Switch [LID] input: Power Button (CM) as /class/input/input4 +parport_pc 00:09: reported by Plug and Play ACPI +parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 3 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA] ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB] -ACPI: AC Adapter [ADP1] (on-line) -pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5 ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present) -shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4 +ACPI: AC Adapter [ADP1] (on-line) acpi device:0f: registered as cooling_device2 input: Video Bus as /class/input/input5 -ACPI: Video Device [VGA] (multi-head: yes rom: yes post: no) Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:01:0b.0 [1179:0001] -Yenta: ISA IRQ mask 0x0cb8, PCI irq 18 +ACPI: Video Device [VGA] (multi-head: yes rom: yes post: no) +Yenta: ISA IRQ mask 0x0c38, PCI irq 18 Socket status: 30000020 pcmcia: parent PCI bridge I/O window: 0xc000 - 0xcfff cs: IO port probe 0xc000-0xcfff: clean. -pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0xcff00000 - 0xcfffffff +pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0xcfe00000 - 0xcfefffff pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0x28000000 - 0x2bffffff Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: power state changed by ACPI to D0 -Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: setting latency timer to 64 input: PS/2 Mouse as /class/input/input6 -input: AlpsPS/2 ALPS GlidePoint as /class/input/input7 -parport_pc 00:09: activated -parport_pc 00:09: reported by Plug and Play ACPI -parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 1 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA] pccard: CardBus card inserted into slot 0 PCI: 0000:02:00.0 reg 10 32bit mmio: [0, ffff] +input: AlpsPS/2 ALPS GlidePoint as /class/input/input7 cs: IO port probe 0x100-0x3af: clean. cs: IO port probe 0x3e0-0x4ff: clean. cs: IO port probe 0x820-0x8ff: clean. cs: IO port probe 0xc00-0xcf7: clean. cs: IO port probe 0xa00-0xaff: clean. -intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 55239 usecs +intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 53133 usecs intel8x0: clocking to 48000 Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: setting latency timer to 64 ath5k_pci 0000:02:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) ath5k_pci 0000:02:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 ath5k_pci 0000:02:00.0: registered as 'phy0' phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid' ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5213A chip found (MAC: 0x59, PHY: 0x43) ath5k phy0: RF2112A 2GHz radio found (0x46) udev: renamed network interface wlan0 to ath0 EXT3 FS on dm-1, internal journal padlock: VIA PadLock not detected. padlock: VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected. loop: module loaded NET: Registered protocol family 10 lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions toshiba_acpi: Toshiba Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.18 toshiba_acpi: HCI method: \_SB_.VALZ.GHCI kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-7, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-5, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-2, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-3, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Adding 1048568k swap on /dev/mapper/strider-swap_crypt. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1048568k ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ath0: link is not ready ath0: authenticate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 ath0: authenticated ath0: associate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 ath0: RX AssocResp from 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1) ath0: associated ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ath0: link becomes ready lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven). ppdev: user-space parallel port driver ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready ath0: no IPv6 routers present ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [bisected][resend] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-20 23:49 ` Frans Pop @ 2008-09-20 23:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2008-09-26 21:40 ` [Bug #11550] " Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2008-09-20 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop Cc: Rene Herman, linux-kernel, Rene Herman, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Jesse Barnes On Saturday 20 September 2008 05:49:05 pm Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 18 September 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 September 2008 12:31:09 pm Rene Herman wrote: > > > On 09-09-08 19:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > If the PCI device isn't fully initialized, it doesn't seem right to > > > > check it for resource conflicts. But I don't know how to tell > > > > that. > > > > > > His pci_resource_start() values are 0. How about just checking for > > > that? > > > > Frans, can you test Rene's patch? I think it will solve the problem > > you're seeing, and if so, we should put it in for 2.6.27. But I'd like > > to have your "Tested-by" first. > > Tested against current git (v2.6.27-rc6-158-g9824b8f) and looks good. > Attached the patch with Rene's Signed-off and my Tested-by for > convenience. > > I had not tested earlier as you said you wanted to better understand the > cause first. Did you get anything more about why things happen as they do > from the info I sent? Thanks for testing this. We're looking at some other issues in the same area, or at least, where the fix might be in the same area: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10231 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9904 I am still not 100% comfortable with this because I think we really want to know whether the BAR value is zero, not whether the CPU address is zero, and pci_resource_start() gives us the CPU address. Bus and CPU addresses are currently identical on x86, but I expect that will change someday. They're already different on ia64 and some other architectures. Bottom line, I think we should tweak the patch to check the BAR address before we put it in. Bjorn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-20 23:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas @ 2008-09-26 21:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2008-09-27 15:16 ` Frans Pop ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2008-09-26 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop Cc: Rene Herman, linux-kernel, Rene Herman, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Jesse Barnes, Matthew Wilcox, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Rafael J. Wysocki, bugme-daemon http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 On Saturday 20 September 2008 05:56:24 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Tuesday 09 September 2008 12:31:09 pm Rene Herman wrote: > > > > On 09-09-08 19:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > If the PCI device isn't fully initialized, it doesn't seem right to > > > > > check it for resource conflicts. But I don't know how to tell > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > His pci_resource_start() values are 0. How about just checking for > > > > that? > ... > I am still not 100% comfortable with this because I think we really > want to know whether the BAR value is zero, not whether the CPU > address is zero, and pci_resource_start() gives us the CPU address. > > Bus and CPU addresses are currently identical on x86, but I expect > that will change someday. They're already different on ia64 and > some other architectures. The problem seems to be that Frans has some PCI devices that are not configured by the BIOS, and their BARs contain zero. A PNP quirk checks for overlaps of PCI devices and PNP devices, and those zero- valued BARs of course conflict with the PNP motherboard devices that describe legacy hardware. Here's another approach based on section 3.5 of the PCI Firmware spec. It says: Since not all devices may be configured prior to the operating system handoff, the operating system needs to know whether a specific BAR register has been configured by firmware. The operating system makes the determination by checking the I/O Enable, and Memory Enable bits in the device's command register, and Expansion ROM BAR enable bits. If the enable bit is set, then the corresponding resource register has been configured. So instead of checking whether the BAR contains zero, the patch below checks the I/O, Mem, and ROM BAR enable bits to determine whether a BAR is enabled. Frans, I'm sorry to trouble you again, but could you test this and make sure it takes care of the "resource overlap" messages you saw? diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c index 1a5fc83..26195c3 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c @@ -26,6 +26,28 @@ #include "pci.h" +int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) +{ + u16 command = 0; + u32 addr = 0; + + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &command); + + if (pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) & IORESOURCE_IO) + return command & PCI_COMMAND_IO; + + if (command & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY) { + if (bar == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) { + pci_read_config_dword(dev, dev->rom_base_reg, &addr); + return addr & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE; + } + + return 1; + } + + return 0; +} + void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, struct resource *res, int resno) { struct pci_bus_region region; diff --git a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c index 0bdf9b8..ef5ed99 100644 --- a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c +++ b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c @@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ static void quirk_system_pci_resources(struct pnp_dev *dev) for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) { unsigned int type; + if (!pci_resource_enabled(pdev, i)) + continue; + type = pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & (IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM); if (!type || pci_resource_len(pdev, i) == 0) diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index c0e1400..28ec520 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -796,6 +796,8 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) } #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ +extern int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar); + #else /* CONFIG_PCI is not enabled */ /* @@ -976,6 +978,9 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn) { return NULL; } +static inline int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) +{ return 0; } + #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */ /* Include architecture-dependent settings and functions */ ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-26 21:40 ` [Bug #11550] " Bjorn Helgaas @ 2008-09-27 15:16 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-27 20:53 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-03-04 20:17 ` Frans Pop 2 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2008-09-27 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Rene Herman, linux-kernel, Rene Herman, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Jesse Barnes, Matthew Wilcox, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Rafael J. Wysocki, bugme-daemon On Friday 26 September 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Here's another approach based on section 3.5 of the PCI Firmware spec. > It says: > > Since not all devices may be configured prior to the operating > system handoff, the operating system needs to know whether a > specific BAR register has been configured by firmware. The operating > system makes the determination by checking the I/O Enable, and > Memory Enable bits in the device's command register, and Expansion > ROM BAR enable bits. If the enable bit is set, then the corresponding > resource register has been configured. > > So instead of checking whether the BAR contains zero, the patch below > checks the I/O, Mem, and ROM BAR enable bits to determine whether a > BAR is enabled. That seems to nicely match what the BIOS setting does on my laptop. > Frans, I'm sorry to trouble you again, but could you test this and > make sure it takes care of the "resource overlap" messages you saw? No problem at all. Works correctly (applied on top of current git). I don't see any unexpected changes in the dmesg output, so: Tested-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Cheers, FJP ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-26 21:40 ` [Bug #11550] " Bjorn Helgaas 2008-09-27 15:16 ` Frans Pop @ 2008-09-27 20:53 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-03-04 20:17 ` Frans Pop 2 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-09-27 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Frans Pop, Rene Herman, linux-kernel, Rene Herman, Thomas Gleixner, Jesse Barnes, Matthew Wilcox, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Rafael J. Wysocki, bugme-daemon * Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote: > The problem seems to be that Frans has some PCI devices that are not > configured by the BIOS, and their BARs contain zero. A PNP quirk > checks for overlaps of PCI devices and PNP devices, and those zero- > valued BARs of course conflict with the PNP motherboard devices that > describe legacy hardware. > > Here's another approach based on section 3.5 of the PCI Firmware spec. > It says: > > Since not all devices may be configured prior to the operating > system handoff, the operating system needs to know whether a > specific BAR register has been configured by firmware. The operating > system makes the determination by checking the I/O Enable, and > Memory Enable bits in the device's command register, and Expansion > ROM BAR enable bits. If the enable bit is set, then the corresponding > resource register has been configured. > > So instead of checking whether the BAR contains zero, the patch below > checks the I/O, Mem, and ROM BAR enable bits to determine whether a > BAR is enabled. cool! Looks like a pretty significant fix, for all sorts of legacy devices. Worth backporting? Ingo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-26 21:40 ` [Bug #11550] " Bjorn Helgaas 2008-09-27 15:16 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-27 20:53 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-04 20:17 ` Frans Pop 2009-03-04 21:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2009-03-04 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Jesse Barnes, Matthew Wilcox, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Rene Herman [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4374 bytes --] On Friday 26 September 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Sorry for having to revive this old thread. In November 2008 I reported that this issue had been solved for me as a result of 1f98757776ea, but I now find that was due to faulty testing. (I suspect that changing the BIOS setting that affects this issue on my Toshiba laptop only takes effect after a cold boot, not a normal reboot.) The problem was that with the BIOS setting for "Device config" set to "Setup by OS", I get 78 messages like: pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling If the BIOS setting is set to "All Devices", the problem does not occur. The origin of these messages was bisected to: commit aee3ad815dd291a7193ab01da0f1a30c84d00061 Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Date: Fri Jun 27 16:56:57 2008 -0600 PNP: replace pnp_resource_table with dynamically allocated resources Last analysis from Bjorn was: > The problem seems to be that Frans has some PCI devices that are not > configured by the BIOS, and their BARs contain zero. A PNP quirk > checks for overlaps of PCI devices and PNP devices, and those zero- > valued BARs of course conflict with the PNP motherboard devices that > describe legacy hardware. > > Here's another approach based on section 3.5 of the PCI Firmware spec. > It says: > > Since not all devices may be configured prior to the operating > system handoff, the operating system needs to know whether a > specific BAR register has been configured by firmware. The operating > system makes the determination by checking the I/O Enable, and > Memory Enable bits in the device's command register, and Expansion > ROM BAR enable bits. If the enable bit is set, then the corresponding > resource register has been configured. > > So instead of checking whether the BAR contains zero, the patch below > checks the I/O, Mem, and ROM BAR enable bits to determine whether a > BAR is enabled. Below the then proposed patch from Bjorn, rediffed against 2.6.29-rc7. I've verified that the patch still solves the issue for me. Attached dmesg output for 2.6.29-rc7 without and with the patch. Bjorn, could you please consider this patch for inclusion again? Original thread: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 TIA and sorry for the confusion, FJP diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c index 32e8d88..e63f800 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c @@ -26,6 +26,28 @@ #include "pci.h" +int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) +{ + u16 command = 0; + u32 addr = 0; + + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &command); + + if (pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) & IORESOURCE_IO) + return command & PCI_COMMAND_IO; + + if (command & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY) { + if (bar == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) { + pci_read_config_dword(dev, dev->rom_base_reg, &addr); + return addr & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE; + } + + return 1; + } + + return 0; +} + void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno) { struct pci_bus_region region; diff --git a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c index 8473fe5..1f37988 100644 --- a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c +++ b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c @@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ static void quirk_system_pci_resources(struct pnp_dev *dev) for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) { unsigned long type; + if (!pci_resource_enabled(pdev, i)) + continue; + type = pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & (IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM); if (!type || pci_resource_len(pdev, i) == 0) diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index c927ae9..9848ac2 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -870,6 +870,8 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) } #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ +extern int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar); + #else /* CONFIG_PCI is not enabled */ /* @@ -1050,6 +1052,9 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn) { return NULL; } +static inline int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) +{ return 0; } + #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */ /* Include architecture-dependent settings and functions */ [-- Attachment #2: 2.6.29-rc7 --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 30943 bytes --] Linux version 2.6.29-rc7 (root@aragorn) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-5) ) #25 SMP Wed Mar 4 13:04:29 CET 2009 KERNEL supported cpus: Intel GenuineIntel AMD AuthenticAMD NSC Geode by NSC Cyrix CyrixInstead Centaur CentaurHauls Transmeta GenuineTMx86 Transmeta TransmetaCPU UMC UMC UMC UMC BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000eee00 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000eee00 - 00000000000ef000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001ef40000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000001ef40000 - 000000001ef50000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 000000001ef50000 - 000000001f000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec10000 - 00000000fec20000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000feda0000 - 00000000fedc0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffb00000 - 00000000ffc00000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffe80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) DMI 2.3 present. last_pfn = 0x1ef40 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000 x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7010600070106, new 0x7010600070106 kernel direct mapping tables up to 1ef40000 @ 7000-c000 RAMDISK: 1eb65000 - 1ef2f4b4 ACPI: RSDP 000F0180, 0014 (r0 TOSHIB) ACPI: RSDT 1EF40000, 0038 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: FACP 1EF40060, 0084 (r2 TOSHIB 750 20030101 TASM 4010000) FADT: X_PM1a_EVT_BLK.bit_width (16) does not match PM1_EVT_LEN (4) ACPI: DSDT 1EF40558, 4B72 (r1 TOSHIB A000C 20031216 MSFT 100000E) ACPI: FACS 000EEE00, 0040 ACPI: SSDT 1EF402CA, 0082 (r1 TOSHIB A000C 20030917 MSFT 100000E) ACPI: DBGP 1EF400E4, 0034 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: BOOT 1EF40038, 0028 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: APIC 1EF40118, 0062 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 0MB HIGHMEM available. 495MB LOWMEM available. mapped low ram: 0 - 1ef40000 low ram: 00000000 - 1ef40000 bootmap 00002000 - 00005de8 (9 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 001ef40000] #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000] #1 [0000001000 - 0000002000] EX TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000001000 - 0000002000] #2 [0000006000 - 0000007000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000007000] #3 [0000100000 - 0000498804] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000100000 - 0000498804] #4 [001eb65000 - 001ef2f4b4] RAMDISK ==> [001eb65000 - 001ef2f4b4] #5 [0000499000 - 000049c000] INIT_PG_TABLE ==> [0000499000 - 000049c000] #6 [000009fc00 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009fc00 - 0000100000] #7 [0000007000 - 0000008000] PGTABLE ==> [0000007000 - 0000008000] #8 [0000002000 - 0000006000] BOOTMAP ==> [0000002000 - 0000006000] Zone PFN ranges: DMA 0x00000000 -> 0x00001000 Normal 0x00001000 -> 0x0001ef40 HighMem 0x0001ef40 -> 0x0001ef40 Movable zone start PFN for each node early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges 0: 0x00000000 -> 0x0000009f 0: 0x00000100 -> 0x0001ef40 On node 0 totalpages: 126687 free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c03cf520, node_mem_map c1000000 DMA zone: 32 pages used for memmap DMA zone: 0 pages reserved DMA zone: 3967 pages, LIFO batch:0 Normal zone: 959 pages used for memmap Normal zone: 121729 pages, LIFO batch:31 ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0xd808 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] disabled) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1]) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information SMP: Allowing 2 CPUs, 1 hotplug CPUs nr_irqs_gsi: 24 PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000000009f000 - 00000000000a0000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000a0000 - 00000000000e0000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000ee000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000ee000 - 00000000000ef000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000 Allocating PCI resources starting at 20000000 (gap: 1f000000:dfc00000) NR_CPUS:8 nr_cpumask_bits:8 nr_cpu_ids:2 nr_node_ids:1 PERCPU: Allocating 32768 bytes of per cpu data Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 125696 Kernel command line: root=/dev/mapper/strider-root ro vga=791 quiet Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done. Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes) TSC: PIT calibration matches PMTIMER. 1 loops Detected 2793.043 MHz processor. Console: colour dummy device 80x25 console [tty0] enabled Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Memory: 494568k/507136k available (1860k kernel code, 12052k reserved, 1112k data, 268k init, 0k highmem) virtual kernel memory layout: fixmap : 0xfff51000 - 0xfffff000 ( 696 kB) pkmap : 0xff800000 - 0xffc00000 (4096 kB) vmalloc : 0xdf740000 - 0xff7fe000 ( 512 MB) lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xdef40000 ( 495 MB) .init : 0xc03ef000 - 0xc0432000 ( 268 kB) .data : 0xc02d127d - 0xc03e75ec (1112 kB) .text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc02d127d (1860 kB) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok. Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 5586.08 BogoMIPS (lpj=11172172) Security Framework initialized SELinux: Disabled at boot. Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K CPU: L2 cache: 512K [ds] using Netburst configuration CPU: Hyper-Threading is disabled Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU0: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (12) available CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. SMP alternatives: switching to UP code ACPI: Core revision 20081204 ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1 CPU0: Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz stepping 09 Brought up 1 CPUs Total of 1 processors activated (5586.08 BogoMIPS). CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. net_namespace: 996 bytes NET: Registered protocol family 16 ACPI: bus type pci registered PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd2fe, last bus=3 PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0 ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT ACPI Warning (dsobject-0502): Package List length (F) larger than NumElements count (2), truncated [20081204] ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI: No dock devices found. ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xd8000000-0xdfffffff] pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0xd0000000-0xd007ffff] pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 18 io port: [0xeff8-0xefff] pci 0000:00:02.0: supports D1 pci 0000:00:02.1: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0x20000000-0x27ffffff] pci 0000:00:02.1: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0x2c000000-0x2c07ffff] pci 0000:00:02.1: supports D1 pci 0000:00:1d.0: reg 20 io port: [0xcfe0-0xcfff] pci 0000:00:1d.1: reg 20 io port: [0xcf80-0xcf9f] pci 0000:00:1d.7: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x0003ff] pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# disabled HPET not enabled in BIOS. You might try hpet=force boot option pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region d800-d87f claimed by ICH4 ACPI/GPIO/TCO pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region eec0-eeff claimed by ICH4 GPIO pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 10 io port: [0xbff8-0xbfff] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 14 io port: [0xbff4-0xbff7] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 18 io port: [0xbfe8-0xbfef] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 1c io port: [0xbfe4-0xbfe7] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 20 io port: [0xbfa0-0xbfaf] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 24 32bit mmio: [0x2c080400-0x2c0807ff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: reg 10 io port: [0x00-0xff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: reg 14 io port: [0x00-0x3f] pci 0000:00:1f.5: reg 18 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x0001ff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: reg 1c 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x0000ff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1f.5: PME# disabled pci 0000:00:1f.6: reg 10 io port: [0x00-0xff] pci 0000:00:1f.6: reg 14 io port: [0x00-0x7f] pci 0000:00:1f.6: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1f.6: PME# disabled pci 0000:01:08.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xcffff000-0xcfffffff] pci 0000:01:08.0: reg 14 io port: [0xcf40-0xcf7f] pci 0000:01:08.0: supports D1 D2 pci 0000:01:08.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:01:08.0: PME# disabled pci 0000:01:0b.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x000fff] pci 0000:00:1e.0: transparent bridge pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge io port: [0xc000-0xcfff] pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xcff00000-0xcfffffff] pci_bus 0000:00: on NUMA node 0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIB._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *10) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: Power Resource [PFAN] (off) PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing pci 0000:00:1d.0: BAR 4: can't allocate resource pci 0000:00:1d.1: BAR 4: can't allocate resource pnp: PnP ACPI init ACPI: bus type pnp registered pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1d.0 BAR 4 (0x0-0x1f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1d.1 BAR 4 (0x0-0x1f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x62-0x62) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x66-0x66) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x80-0x80) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x84-0x86) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x88-0x88) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x8c-0x8e) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xe0-0xef) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x24-0x25) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x28-0x29) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2c-0x2d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x30-0x31) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x34-0x35) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x38-0x39) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x3c-0x3d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x50-0x53) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x63-0x63) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x65-0x65) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x72-0x77) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x90-0x9f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xa4-0xa5) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xa8-0xa9) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xac-0xad) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xb0-0xb5) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xb8-0xb9) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xbc-0xbd) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x24-0x25) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x28-0x29) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2c-0x2d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x30-0x31) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x34-0x35) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x38-0x39) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x3c-0x3d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 1 (0x0-0x3f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x62-0x62) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x66-0x66) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x80-0x80) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x84-0x86) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x88-0x88) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x8c-0x8e) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xe0-0xef) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x24-0x25) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x28-0x29) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2c-0x2d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x30-0x31) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x34-0x35) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x38-0x39) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x3c-0x3d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x50-0x53) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x63-0x63) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x65-0x65) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x72-0x77) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x90-0x9f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xa4-0xa5) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xa8-0xa9) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xac-0xad) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xb0-0xb5) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xb8-0xb9) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0xbc-0xbd) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x62-0x62) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x66-0x66) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x24-0x25) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x28-0x29) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2c-0x2d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x30-0x31) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x34-0x35) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x38-0x39) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x3c-0x3d) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x50-0x53) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x63-0x63) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x65-0x65) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x72-0x77) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 1 (0x0-0x7f), disabling pnp: PnP ACPI: found 10 devices ACPI: ACPI bus type pnp unregistered PnPBIOS: Disabled by ACPI PNP system 00:00: iomem range 0x0-0x9ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xe0000-0xeffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xf0000-0xfffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x100000-0x1ef3ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x1ef40000-0x1ef4ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x1ef50000-0x1effffff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfec10000-0xfec1ffff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfeda0000-0xfedbffff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec00fff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee00fff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xffe80000-0xffffffff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x1e0-0x1ef has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x480-0x48f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x680-0x6ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd800-0xd87f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd880-0xd89f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd8a0-0xd8bf has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe000-0xe07f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe080-0xe0ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe400-0xe47f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe480-0xe4ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe800-0xe87f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe880-0xe8ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xec00-0xec7f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xec80-0xecff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeeac-0xeeac has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeeb0-0xeebf has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeec0-0xeeff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved pci 0000:01:0b.0: CardBus bridge, secondary bus 0000:02 pci 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c000-0x00c0ff pci 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c400-0x00c4ff pci 0000:01:0b.0: PREFETCH window: 0x28000000-0x2bffffff pci 0000:01:0b.0: MEM window: 0x30000000-0x33ffffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:01 pci 0000:00:1e.0: IO window: 0xc000-0xcfff pci 0000:00:1e.0: MEM window: 0xcff00000-0xcfffffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: PREFETCH window: 0x00000028000000-0x0000002bffffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: setting latency timer to 64 pci 0000:01:0b.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) pci 0000:01:0b.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 pci_bus 0000:00: resource 0 io: [0x00-0xffff] pci_bus 0000:00: resource 1 mem: [0x000000-0xffffffff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 0 io: [0xc000-0xcfff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 1 mem: [0xcff00000-0xcfffffff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 2 mem: [0x28000000-0x2bffffff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 3 io: [0x00-0xffff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 4 mem: [0x000000-0xffffffff] pci_bus 0000:02: resource 0 io: [0xc000-0xc0ff] pci_bus 0000:02: resource 1 io: [0xc400-0xc4ff] pci_bus 0000:02: resource 2 mem: [0x28000000-0x2bffffff] pci_bus 0000:02: resource 3 mem: [0x30000000-0x33ffffff] NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP route cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) TCP established hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) TCP bind hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 16384) TCP reno registered NET: Registered protocol family 1 checking if image is initramfs... it is Freeing initrd memory: 3881k freed Simple Boot Flag at 0x7c set to 0x1 audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled) type=2000 audit(1236175417.524:1): initialized VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.2 Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes) msgmni has been set to 973 alg: No test for stdrng (krng) io scheduler noop registered io scheduler anticipatory registered io scheduler deadline registered io scheduler cfq registered (default) pci 0000:00:02.0: Boot video device pci 0000:01:08.0: Firmware left e100 interrupts enabled; disabling vesafb: framebuffer at 0xd8000000, mapped to 0xdf780000, using 3072k, total 16192k vesafb: mode is 1024x768x16, linelength=2048, pages=9 vesafb: scrolling: redraw vesafb: Truecolor: size=0:5:6:5, shift=0:11:5:0 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 fb0: VESA VGA frame buffer device isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards... Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0 isapnp: No Plug & Play device found Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled serial 0000:00:1f.6: power state changed by ACPI to D0 serial 0000:00:1f.6: enabling device (0000 -> 0001) serial 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 serial 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B disabled brd: module loaded e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.23-k6-NAPI e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation e100 0000:01:08.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 e100 0000:01:08.0: PME# disabled e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xcffff000, irq 20, MAC addr 00:08:0d:17:bf:f5 console [netcon0] enabled netconsole: network logging started PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:KBC,PNP0f13:PS2M] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12 serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice cpuidle: using governor ladder cpuidle: using governor menu TCP bic registered NET: Registered protocol family 17 Using IPI No-Shortcut mode Freeing unused kernel memory: 268k freed input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input0 fan PNP0C0B:00: registered as cooling_device0 ACPI: Fan [FAN] (off) ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3]) processor ACPI_CPU:00: registered as cooling_device1 thermal LNXTHERM:01: registered as thermal_zone0 ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (58 C) usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs usbcore: registered new interface driver hub usbcore: registered new device driver usb ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: PCI INT D -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 23 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: setting latency timer to 64 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: EHCI Host Controller ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: debug port 1 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: cache line size of 128 is not supported ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: irq 23, io mem 0x2c080000 uhci_hcd: USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00 usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 1-0:1.0: 6 ports detected uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: setting latency timer to 64 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: irq 16, io base 0x000018c0 usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: setting latency timer to 64 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: irq 19, io base 0x000018e0 usb usb3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 3-0:1.0: 2 ports detected Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver piix 0000:00:1f.1: IDE controller (0x8086:0x24ca rev 0x03) PIIX_IDE 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 piix 0000:00:1f.1: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide0: BM-DMA at 0xbfa0-0xbfa7 ide1: BM-DMA at 0xbfa8-0xbfaf Probing IDE interface ide0... Marking TSC unstable due to TSC halts in idle hda: HTS541080G9AT00, ATA DISK drive hda: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4 hda: UDMA/100 mode selected Probing IDE interface ide1... Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -496610873 ns) hdc: TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-R6112, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive hdc: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4 hdc: UDMA/33 mode selected ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 SCSI subsystem initialized libata version 3.00 loaded. ide-gd driver 1.18 hda: max request size: 512KiB ide-cd driver 5.00 hda: 156301488 sectors (80026 MB) w/7539KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63 hda: cache flushes supported hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4 < hda5 hda6 hda7 > ide-cd: hdc: ATAPI 24X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 device-mapper: ioctl: 4.14.0-ioctl (2008-04-23) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. udevd version 125 started input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input1 ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF] input: Lid Switch as /class/input/input2 ACPI: Lid Switch [LID] input: Power Button (CM) as /class/input/input3 ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB] ACPI Warning (nspredef-0940): \_SB_.BAT1._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 12 - found Integer, expected String/Buffer [20081204] ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present) ACPI: AC Adapter [ADP1] (on-line) Linux agpgart interface v0.103 acpi device:0f: registered as cooling_device2 input: Video Bus as /class/input/input4 ACPI: Video Device [VGA] (multi-head: yes rom: yes post: no) parport_pc 00:09: activated parport_pc 00:09: reported by Plug and Play ACPI parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 1 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA] iTCO_wdt: Intel TCO WatchDog Timer Driver v1.05 iTCO_wdt: Found a ICH4-M TCO device (Version=1, TCOBASE=0xd860) iTCO_wdt: initialized. heartbeat=30 sec (nowayout=0) input: PC Speaker as /class/input/input5 agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: Intel 855GM Chipset agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: detected 16252K stolen memory agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xd8000000 pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5 shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4 rtc_cmos 00:07: RTC can wake from S4 rtc_cmos 00:07: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 rtc0: alarms up to one year, 114 bytes nvram toshiba_acpi: Toshiba Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.19 toshiba_acpi: HCI method: \_SB_.VALZ.GHCI yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: CardBus bridge found [1179:0001] yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: ISA IRQ mask 0x0c38, PCI irq 18 yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: Socket status: 30000020 yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge I/O window: 0xc000 - 0xcfff pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0xc000-0xcfff: clean. yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0xcff00000 - 0xcfffffff yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0x28000000 - 0x2bffffff Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: setting latency timer to 64 input: PS/2 Mouse as /class/input/input6 input: AlpsPS/2 ALPS GlidePoint as /class/input/input7 pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: pccard: CardBus card inserted into slot 0 pci 0000:02:00.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x00ffff] cfg80211: Using static regulatory domain info cfg80211: Regulatory domain: EU (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp) (2402000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2000 mBm) (5170000 KHz - 5190000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm) (5190000 KHz - 5210000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm) (5210000 KHz - 5230000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm) (5230000 KHz - 5330000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2000 mBm) (5490000 KHz - 5710000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 3000 mBm) pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0x100-0x3af: clean. pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0x3e0-0x4ff: clean. pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0x820-0x8ff: clean. pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0xc00-0xcf7: clean. pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0xa00-0xaff: clean. ath5k 0000:02:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) ath5k 0000:02:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 ath5k 0000:02:00.0: registered as 'phy0' wmaster0 (ath5k): not using net_device_ops yet phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'minstrel' wlan0 (ath5k): not using net_device_ops yet ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5213A chip found (MAC: 0x59, PHY: 0x43) ath5k phy0: RF2112B 2GHz radio found (0x46) udev: renamed network interface wlan0 to ath0 intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 55377 usecs intel8x0: clocking to 48000 Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: setting latency timer to 64 EXT3 FS on dm-1, internal journal loop: module loaded NET: Registered protocol family 10 lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-7, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-5, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-2, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-3, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Adding 1048568k swap on /dev/mapper/strider-swap_crypt. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1048568k ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ath0: link is not ready ath0: authenticate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 ath0: authenticated ath0: associate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 ath0: RX AssocResp from 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=2) ath0: associated ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ath0: link becomes ready lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven). ppdev: user-space parallel port driver ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready ath0: no IPv6 routers present ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. [-- Attachment #3: 2.6.29-rc7.patched --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 24300 bytes --] Linux version 2.6.29-rc7 (root@aragorn) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-5) ) #10 SMP Wed Mar 4 20:32:19 CET 2009 KERNEL supported cpus: Intel GenuineIntel AMD AuthenticAMD NSC Geode by NSC Cyrix CyrixInstead Centaur CentaurHauls Transmeta GenuineTMx86 Transmeta TransmetaCPU UMC UMC UMC UMC BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000eee00 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000eee00 - 00000000000ef000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001ef40000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000001ef40000 - 000000001ef50000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 000000001ef50000 - 000000001f000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec10000 - 00000000fec20000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000feda0000 - 00000000fedc0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffb00000 - 00000000ffc00000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffe80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) DMI 2.3 present. last_pfn = 0x1ef40 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000 x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106 kernel direct mapping tables up to 1ef40000 @ 7000-c000 RAMDISK: 1eb65000 - 1ef2f40f ACPI: RSDP 000F0180, 0014 (r0 TOSHIB) ACPI: RSDT 1EF40000, 0038 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: FACP 1EF40060, 0084 (r2 TOSHIB 750 20030101 TASM 4010000) FADT: X_PM1a_EVT_BLK.bit_width (16) does not match PM1_EVT_LEN (4) ACPI: DSDT 1EF40558, 4B72 (r1 TOSHIB A000C 20031216 MSFT 100000E) ACPI: FACS 000EEE00, 0040 ACPI: SSDT 1EF402CA, 0082 (r1 TOSHIB A000C 20030917 MSFT 100000E) ACPI: DBGP 1EF400E4, 0034 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: BOOT 1EF40038, 0028 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: APIC 1EF40118, 0062 (r1 TOSHIB 750 970814 TASM 4010000) ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 0MB HIGHMEM available. 495MB LOWMEM available. mapped low ram: 0 - 1ef40000 low ram: 00000000 - 1ef40000 bootmap 00002000 - 00005de8 (9 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 001ef40000] #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000] #1 [0000001000 - 0000002000] EX TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000001000 - 0000002000] #2 [0000006000 - 0000007000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000007000] #3 [0000100000 - 0000498804] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000100000 - 0000498804] #4 [001eb65000 - 001ef2f40f] RAMDISK ==> [001eb65000 - 001ef2f40f] #5 [0000499000 - 000049c000] INIT_PG_TABLE ==> [0000499000 - 000049c000] #6 [000009fc00 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009fc00 - 0000100000] #7 [0000007000 - 0000008000] PGTABLE ==> [0000007000 - 0000008000] #8 [0000002000 - 0000006000] BOOTMAP ==> [0000002000 - 0000006000] Zone PFN ranges: DMA 0x00000000 -> 0x00001000 Normal 0x00001000 -> 0x0001ef40 HighMem 0x0001ef40 -> 0x0001ef40 Movable zone start PFN for each node early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges 0: 0x00000000 -> 0x0000009f 0: 0x00000100 -> 0x0001ef40 On node 0 totalpages: 126687 free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c03cf520, node_mem_map c1000000 DMA zone: 32 pages used for memmap DMA zone: 0 pages reserved DMA zone: 3967 pages, LIFO batch:0 Normal zone: 959 pages used for memmap Normal zone: 121729 pages, LIFO batch:31 ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0xd808 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] disabled) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1]) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information SMP: Allowing 2 CPUs, 1 hotplug CPUs nr_irqs_gsi: 24 PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000000009f000 - 00000000000a0000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000a0000 - 00000000000e0000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000ee000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000ee000 - 00000000000ef000 PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000 Allocating PCI resources starting at 20000000 (gap: 1f000000:dfc00000) NR_CPUS:8 nr_cpumask_bits:8 nr_cpu_ids:2 nr_node_ids:1 PERCPU: Allocating 32768 bytes of per cpu data Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 125696 Kernel command line: root=/dev/mapper/strider-root rootdelay=10 ro vga=791 quiet Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done. Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes) Fast TSC calibration using PIT Detected 2793.051 MHz processor. Console: colour dummy device 80x25 console [tty0] enabled Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Memory: 494568k/507136k available (1860k kernel code, 12052k reserved, 1112k data, 268k init, 0k highmem) virtual kernel memory layout: fixmap : 0xfff51000 - 0xfffff000 ( 696 kB) pkmap : 0xff800000 - 0xffc00000 (4096 kB) vmalloc : 0xdf740000 - 0xff7fe000 ( 512 MB) lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xdef40000 ( 495 MB) .init : 0xc03ef000 - 0xc0432000 ( 268 kB) .data : 0xc02d130d - 0xc03e75ec (1112 kB) .text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc02d130d (1860 kB) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok. Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 5586.10 BogoMIPS (lpj=11172204) Security Framework initialized SELinux: Disabled at boot. Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K CPU: L2 cache: 512K [ds] using Netburst configuration CPU: Hyper-Threading is disabled Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU0: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (12) available CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. SMP alternatives: switching to UP code ACPI: Core revision 20081204 ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1 CPU0: Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz stepping 09 Brought up 1 CPUs Total of 1 processors activated (5586.10 BogoMIPS). CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. net_namespace: 996 bytes NET: Registered protocol family 16 ACPI: bus type pci registered PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd2fe, last bus=3 PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0 ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT ACPI Warning (dsobject-0502): Package List length (F) larger than NumElements count (2), truncated [20081204] ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI: No dock devices found. ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xd8000000-0xdfffffff] pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0xd0000000-0xd007ffff] pci 0000:00:02.0: reg 18 io port: [0xeff8-0xefff] pci 0000:00:02.0: supports D1 pci 0000:00:02.1: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x7ffffff] pci 0000:00:02.1: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x07ffff] pci 0000:00:02.1: supports D1 pci 0000:00:1d.0: reg 20 io port: [0xcfe0-0xcfff] pci 0000:00:1d.1: reg 20 io port: [0xcf80-0xcf9f] pci 0000:00:1d.7: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x0003ff] pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# disabled HPET not enabled in BIOS. You might try hpet=force boot option pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region d800-d87f claimed by ICH4 ACPI/GPIO/TCO pci 0000:00:1f.0: quirk: region eec0-eeff claimed by ICH4 GPIO pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 10 io port: [0xbff8-0xbfff] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 14 io port: [0xbff4-0xbff7] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 18 io port: [0xbfe8-0xbfef] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 1c io port: [0xbfe4-0xbfe7] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 20 io port: [0xbfa0-0xbfaf] pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 24 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x0003ff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: reg 10 io port: [0x00-0xff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: reg 14 io port: [0x00-0x3f] pci 0000:00:1f.5: reg 18 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x0001ff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: reg 1c 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x0000ff] pci 0000:00:1f.5: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1f.5: PME# disabled pci 0000:00:1f.6: reg 10 io port: [0x00-0xff] pci 0000:00:1f.6: reg 14 io port: [0x00-0x7f] pci 0000:00:1f.6: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:00:1f.6: PME# disabled pci 0000:01:08.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xcffff000-0xcfffffff] pci 0000:01:08.0: reg 14 io port: [0xcf40-0xcf7f] pci 0000:01:08.0: supports D1 D2 pci 0000:01:08.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot D3cold pci 0000:01:08.0: PME# disabled pci 0000:01:0b.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x000fff] pci 0000:00:1e.0: transparent bridge pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge io port: [0xc000-0xcfff] pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xcff00000-0xcfffffff] pci_bus 0000:00: on NUMA node 0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIB._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs *10) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *11) ACPI: Power Resource [PFAN] (off) PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing pci 0000:00:1d.0: BAR 4: can't allocate resource pci 0000:00:1d.1: BAR 4: can't allocate resource pnp: PnP ACPI init ACPI: bus type pnp registered pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1d.0 BAR 4 (0x0-0x1f), disabling pnp 00:08: io resource (0x10-0x1f) overlaps 0000:00:1d.1 BAR 4 (0x0-0x1f), disabling pnp: PnP ACPI: found 10 devices ACPI: ACPI bus type pnp unregistered PnPBIOS: Disabled by ACPI PNP system 00:00: iomem range 0x0-0x9ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xe0000-0xeffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xf0000-0xfffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x100000-0x1ef3ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x1ef40000-0x1ef4ffff could not be reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0x1ef50000-0x1effffff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfec10000-0xfec1ffff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfeda0000-0xfedbffff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfec00000-0xfec00fff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee00fff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff has been reserved system 00:00: iomem range 0xffe80000-0xffffffff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x1e0-0x1ef has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x480-0x48f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x680-0x6ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd800-0xd87f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd880-0xd89f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xd8a0-0xd8bf has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe000-0xe07f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe080-0xe0ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe400-0xe47f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe480-0xe4ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe800-0xe87f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xe880-0xe8ff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xec00-0xec7f has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xec80-0xecff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeeac-0xeeac has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeeb0-0xeebf has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0xeec0-0xeeff has been reserved system 00:08: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved pci 0000:01:0b.0: CardBus bridge, secondary bus 0000:02 pci 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c000-0x00c0ff pci 0000:01:0b.0: IO window: 0x00c400-0x00c4ff pci 0000:01:0b.0: PREFETCH window: 0x28000000-0x2bffffff pci 0000:01:0b.0: MEM window: 0x30000000-0x33ffffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:01 pci 0000:00:1e.0: IO window: 0xc000-0xcfff pci 0000:00:1e.0: MEM window: 0xcff00000-0xcfffffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: PREFETCH window: 0x00000028000000-0x0000002bffffff pci 0000:00:1e.0: setting latency timer to 64 pci 0000:01:0b.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) pci 0000:01:0b.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 pci_bus 0000:00: resource 0 io: [0x00-0xffff] pci_bus 0000:00: resource 1 mem: [0x000000-0xffffffff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 0 io: [0xc000-0xcfff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 1 mem: [0xcff00000-0xcfffffff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 2 mem: [0x28000000-0x2bffffff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 3 io: [0x00-0xffff] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 4 mem: [0x000000-0xffffffff] pci_bus 0000:02: resource 0 io: [0xc000-0xc0ff] pci_bus 0000:02: resource 1 io: [0xc400-0xc4ff] pci_bus 0000:02: resource 2 mem: [0x28000000-0x2bffffff] pci_bus 0000:02: resource 3 mem: [0x30000000-0x33ffffff] NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP route cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) TCP established hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) TCP bind hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 16384) TCP reno registered NET: Registered protocol family 1 checking if image is initramfs... it is Freeing initrd memory: 3881k freed Simple Boot Flag at 0x7c set to 0x1 audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled) type=2000 audit(1236195728.528:1): initialized VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.2 Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes) msgmni has been set to 973 alg: No test for stdrng (krng) io scheduler noop registered io scheduler anticipatory registered io scheduler deadline registered io scheduler cfq registered (default) pci 0000:00:02.0: Boot video device pci 0000:01:08.0: Firmware left e100 interrupts enabled; disabling vesafb: framebuffer at 0xd8000000, mapped to 0xdf780000, using 3072k, total 16192k vesafb: mode is 1024x768x16, linelength=2048, pages=9 vesafb: scrolling: redraw vesafb: Truecolor: size=0:5:6:5, shift=0:11:5:0 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 fb0: VESA VGA frame buffer device isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards... Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0 isapnp: No Plug & Play device found Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled serial 0000:00:1f.6: power state changed by ACPI to D0 serial 0000:00:1f.6: enabling device (0000 -> 0001) serial 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 serial 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B disabled brd: module loaded e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.23-k6-NAPI e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation e100 0000:01:08.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 20 e100 0000:01:08.0: PME# disabled e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xcffff000, irq 20, MAC addr 00:08:0d:17:bf:f5 console [netcon0] enabled netconsole: network logging started PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:KBC,PNP0f13:PS2M] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12 serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice cpuidle: using governor ladder cpuidle: using governor menu TCP bic registered NET: Registered protocol family 17 Using IPI No-Shortcut mode Freeing unused kernel memory: 268k freed input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input0 fan PNP0C0B:00: registered as cooling_device0 ACPI: Fan [FAN] (off) ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3]) processor ACPI_CPU:00: registered as cooling_device1 thermal LNXTHERM:01: registered as thermal_zone0 ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (33 C) usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs usbcore: registered new interface driver hub usbcore: registered new device driver usb ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: PCI INT D -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 23 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: setting latency timer to 64 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: EHCI Host Controller ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: debug port 1 ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: cache line size of 128 is not supported ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: irq 23, io mem 0x2c080000 uhci_hcd: USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00 usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 1-0:1.0: 6 ports detected uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: setting latency timer to 64 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: irq 16, io base 0x000018c0 usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: setting latency timer to 64 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.1: irq 19, io base 0x000018e0 usb usb3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 3-0:1.0: 2 ports detected Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver piix 0000:00:1f.1: IDE controller (0x8086:0x24ca rev 0x03) PIIX_IDE 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 piix 0000:00:1f.1: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide0: BM-DMA at 0xbfa0-0xbfa7 ide1: BM-DMA at 0xbfa8-0xbfaf Probing IDE interface ide0... Marking TSC unstable due to TSC halts in idle hda: HTS541080G9AT00, ATA DISK drive hda: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4 hda: UDMA/100 mode selected Probing IDE interface ide1... Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -496546074 ns) hdc: TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-R6112, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive hdc: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4 hdc: UDMA/33 mode selected ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 SCSI subsystem initialized libata version 3.00 loaded. ide-gd driver 1.18 hda: max request size: 512KiB ide-cd driver 5.00 hda: 156301488 sectors (80026 MB) w/7539KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63 hda: cache flushes supported hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4 < hda5 hda6 hda7 > ide-cd: hdc: ATAPI 24X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 device-mapper: ioctl: 4.14.0-ioctl (2008-04-23) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. udevd version 125 started Linux agpgart interface v0.103 input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input1 ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF] input: Lid Switch as /class/input/input2 ACPI: Lid Switch [LID] input: Power Button (CM) as /class/input/input3 ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB] ACPI: AC Adapter [ADP1] (on-line) ACPI Warning (nspredef-0940): \_SB_.BAT1._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 12 - found Integer, expected String/Buffer [20081204] ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present) agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: Intel 855GM Chipset agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: detected 16252K stolen memory agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xd8000000 acpi device:0f: registered as cooling_device2 input: Video Bus as /class/input/input4 ACPI: Video Device [VGA] (multi-head: yes rom: yes post: no) parport_pc 00:09: activated parport_pc 00:09: reported by Plug and Play ACPI parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 1 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA] rtc_cmos 00:07: RTC can wake from S4 rtc_cmos 00:07: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 rtc0: alarms up to one year, 114 bytes nvram pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5 shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4 input: PC Speaker as /class/input/input5 iTCO_wdt: Intel TCO WatchDog Timer Driver v1.05 iTCO_wdt: Found a ICH4-M TCO device (Version=1, TCOBASE=0xd860) iTCO_wdt: initialized. heartbeat=30 sec (nowayout=0) toshiba_acpi: Toshiba Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.19 toshiba_acpi: HCI method: \_SB_.VALZ.GHCI yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: CardBus bridge found [1179:0001] yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: ISA IRQ mask 0x0c38, PCI irq 18 yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: Socket status: 30000020 yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge I/O window: 0xc000 - 0xcfff pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0xc000-0xcfff: clean. yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0xcff00000 - 0xcfffffff yenta_cardbus 0000:01:0b.0: pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0x28000000 - 0x2bffffff Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Intel ICH Modem 0000:00:1f.6: setting latency timer to 64 Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Intel ICH 0000:00:1f.5: setting latency timer to 64 input: PS/2 Mouse as /class/input/input6 input: AlpsPS/2 ALPS GlidePoint as /class/input/input7 pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: pccard: CardBus card inserted into slot 0 pci 0000:02:00.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x00ffff] cfg80211: Using static regulatory domain info cfg80211: Regulatory domain: EU (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp) (2402000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2000 mBm) (5170000 KHz - 5190000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm) (5190000 KHz - 5210000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm) (5210000 KHz - 5230000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm) (5230000 KHz - 5330000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2000 mBm) (5490000 KHz - 5710000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 3000 mBm) pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0x100-0x3af: clean. pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0x3e0-0x4ff: clean. pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0x820-0x8ff: clean. pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0xc00-0xcf7: clean. pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: cs: IO port probe 0xa00-0xaff: clean. ath5k 0000:02:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) ath5k 0000:02:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 ath5k 0000:02:00.0: registered as 'phy0' wmaster0 (ath5k): not using net_device_ops yet phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'minstrel' wlan0 (ath5k): not using net_device_ops yet ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5213A chip found (MAC: 0x59, PHY: 0x43) ath5k phy0: RF2112B 2GHz radio found (0x46) udev: renamed network interface wlan0 to ath0 intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 55358 usecs intel8x0: clocking to 48000 EXT3 FS on dm-1, internal journal loop: module loaded NET: Registered protocol family 10 lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-7, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-5, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-2, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS on dm-3, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Adding 1048568k swap on /dev/mapper/strider-swap_crypt. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1048568k ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ath0: link is not ready ath0: authenticate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 ath0: authenticated ath0: associate with AP 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 ath0: RX AssocResp from 00:14:c1:38:e5:15 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=2) ath0: associated ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ath0: link becomes ready lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven). ppdev: user-space parallel port driver ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready ath0: no IPv6 routers present CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2009-03-04 20:17 ` Frans Pop @ 2009-03-04 21:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2009-03-20 2:07 ` Jesse Barnes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2009-03-04 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Jesse Barnes, Matthew Wilcox, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Rene Herman On Wednesday 04 March 2009 01:17:15 pm Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 26 September 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 > > Sorry for having to revive this old thread. In November 2008 I reported > that this issue had been solved for me as a result of 1f98757776ea, but I > now find that was due to faulty testing. (I suspect that changing the BIOS > setting that affects this issue on my Toshiba laptop only takes effect > after a cold boot, not a normal reboot.) > > The problem was that with the BIOS setting for "Device config" set to > "Setup by OS", I get 78 messages like: > pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.5 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling > pnp 00:08: io resource (0x2e-0x2f) overlaps 0000:00:1f.6 BAR 0 (0x0-0xff), disabling > > If the BIOS setting is set to "All Devices", the problem does not occur. > > The origin of these messages was bisected to: > commit aee3ad815dd291a7193ab01da0f1a30c84d00061 > Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > Date: Fri Jun 27 16:56:57 2008 -0600 > PNP: replace pnp_resource_table with dynamically allocated resources > > Last analysis from Bjorn was: > > The problem seems to be that Frans has some PCI devices that are not > > configured by the BIOS, and their BARs contain zero. A PNP quirk > > checks for overlaps of PCI devices and PNP devices, and those zero- > > valued BARs of course conflict with the PNP motherboard devices that > > describe legacy hardware. > > > > Here's another approach based on section 3.5 of the PCI Firmware spec. > > It says: > > > > Since not all devices may be configured prior to the operating > > system handoff, the operating system needs to know whether a > > specific BAR register has been configured by firmware. The operating > > system makes the determination by checking the I/O Enable, and > > Memory Enable bits in the device's command register, and Expansion > > ROM BAR enable bits. If the enable bit is set, then the corresponding > > resource register has been configured. > > > > So instead of checking whether the BAR contains zero, the patch below > > checks the I/O, Mem, and ROM BAR enable bits to determine whether a > > BAR is enabled. > > Below the then proposed patch from Bjorn, rediffed against 2.6.29-rc7. > I've verified that the patch still solves the issue for me. Attached > dmesg output for 2.6.29-rc7 without and with the patch. > > Bjorn, could you please consider this patch for inclusion again? > > Original thread: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Seems like we do need something, but this patch is kind of a klunky approach, so I'd like to come up with a better proposal. I don't have any better ideas yet, though. Bjorn > diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > index 32e8d88..e63f800 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > @@ -26,6 +26,28 @@ > #include "pci.h" > > > +int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) > +{ > + u16 command = 0; > + u32 addr = 0; > + > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &command); > + > + if (pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) & IORESOURCE_IO) > + return command & PCI_COMMAND_IO; > + > + if (command & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY) { > + if (bar == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) { > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, dev->rom_base_reg, &addr); > + return addr & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE; > + } > + > + return 1; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno) > { > struct pci_bus_region region; > diff --git a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > index 8473fe5..1f37988 100644 > --- a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > +++ b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > @@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ static void quirk_system_pci_resources(struct pnp_dev *dev) > for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) { > unsigned long type; > > + if (!pci_resource_enabled(pdev, i)) > + continue; > + > type = pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & > (IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM); > if (!type || pci_resource_len(pdev, i) == 0) > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index c927ae9..9848ac2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -870,6 +870,8 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) > } > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ > > +extern int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar); > + > #else /* CONFIG_PCI is not enabled */ > > /* > @@ -1050,6 +1052,9 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, > unsigned int devfn) > { return NULL; } > > +static inline int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) > +{ return 0; } > + > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */ > > /* Include architecture-dependent settings and functions */ > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2009-03-04 21:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas @ 2009-03-20 2:07 ` Jesse Barnes 2009-03-23 15:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 134+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2009-03-20 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Frans Pop, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Matthew Wilcox, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Rene Herman On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:53:51 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 01:17:15 pm Frans Pop wrote: > > Original thread: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 > > Seems like we do need something, but this patch is kind of a klunky > approach, so I'd like to come up with a better proposal. I don't > have any better ideas yet, though. Patch actually seems pretty reasonable to me, though like we discussed at kernel summit last year, there are places where a 0 resource is assumed to mean "not assigned". And clearly we need to do something here... Anyone else have better ideas than Bjorn's patch below? > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > > index 32e8d88..e63f800 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > > @@ -26,6 +26,28 @@ > > #include "pci.h" > > > > > > +int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) > > +{ > > + u16 command = 0; > > + u32 addr = 0; > > + > > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &command); > > + > > + if (pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) & IORESOURCE_IO) > > + return command & PCI_COMMAND_IO; > > + > > + if (command & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY) { > > + if (bar == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) { > > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, > > dev->rom_base_reg, &addr); > > + return addr & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE; > > + } > > + > > + return 1; > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno) > > { > > struct pci_bus_region region; > > diff --git a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > > index 8473fe5..1f37988 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > > +++ b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > > @@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ static void quirk_system_pci_resources(struct > > pnp_dev *dev) for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) { > > unsigned long type; > > > > + if (!pci_resource_enabled(pdev, i)) > > + continue; > > + > > type = pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & > > (IORESOURCE_IO | > > IORESOURCE_MEM); if (!type || pci_resource_len(pdev, i) == 0) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > > index c927ae9..9848ac2 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > > @@ -870,6 +870,8 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct > > pci_bus *bus) } > > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ > > > > +extern int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar); > > + > > #else /* CONFIG_PCI is not enabled */ > > > > /* > > @@ -1050,6 +1052,9 @@ static inline struct pci_dev > > *pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn) > > { return NULL; } > > > > +static inline int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int > > bar) +{ return 0; } > > + > > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */ > > > > /* Include architecture-dependent settings and functions */ > > > > > > > -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2009-03-20 2:07 ` Jesse Barnes @ 2009-03-23 15:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 134+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2009-03-23 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Frans Pop, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Matthew Wilcox, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Rene Herman On Thursday 19 March 2009 08:07:51 pm Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:53:51 -0700 > Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 01:17:15 pm Frans Pop wrote: > > > Original thread: > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 > > > > Seems like we do need something, but this patch is kind of a klunky > > approach, so I'd like to come up with a better proposal. I don't > > have any better ideas yet, though. > > Patch actually seems pretty reasonable to me, though like we discussed > at kernel summit last year, there are places where a 0 resource is > assumed to mean "not assigned". And clearly we need to do something > here... Anyone else have better ideas than Bjorn's patch below? IIRC, Linus complained that it was ugly and slow to do all those config space reads, and I have to agree with him. I'd like it better if we had some sort of pci_dev "enabled" flag or if we could make it so the pci_dev resources were invalid when the device is disabled. Bjorn > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > > > index 32e8d88..e63f800 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > > > @@ -26,6 +26,28 @@ > > > #include "pci.h" > > > > > > > > > +int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) > > > +{ > > > + u16 command = 0; > > > + u32 addr = 0; > > > + > > > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &command); > > > + > > > + if (pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) & IORESOURCE_IO) > > > + return command & PCI_COMMAND_IO; > > > + > > > + if (command & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY) { > > > + if (bar == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) { > > > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, > > > dev->rom_base_reg, &addr); > > > + return addr & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE; > > > + } > > > + > > > + return 1; > > > + } > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno) > > > { > > > struct pci_bus_region region; > > > diff --git a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > > > index 8473fe5..1f37988 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pnp/quirks.c > > > @@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ static void quirk_system_pci_resources(struct > > > pnp_dev *dev) for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) { > > > unsigned long type; > > > > > > + if (!pci_resource_enabled(pdev, i)) > > > + continue; > > > + > > > type = pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & > > > (IORESOURCE_IO | > > > IORESOURCE_MEM); if (!type || pci_resource_len(pdev, i) == 0) > > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > > > index c927ae9..9848ac2 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > > > @@ -870,6 +870,8 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct > > > pci_bus *bus) } > > > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ > > > > > > +extern int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar); > > > + > > > #else /* CONFIG_PCI is not enabled */ > > > > > > /* > > > @@ -1050,6 +1052,9 @@ static inline struct pci_dev > > > *pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn) > > > { return NULL; } > > > > > > +static inline int pci_resource_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev, int > > > bar) +{ return 0; } > > > + > > > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */ > > > > > > /* Include architecture-dependent settings and functions */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 134+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-23 15:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 134+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 18:59 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD " Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11276] build error: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y causes gcc 4.2 to do stupid things Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 20:46 ` Randy Dunlap 2008-09-12 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-17 14:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 8:47 ` Jaswinder Singh 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-16 15:25 ` Jaswinder Singh 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11336] 2.6.27-rc2:stall while mounting root fs Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 22:05 ` Christoph Lameter 2008-09-13 11:44 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-13 11:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-14 6:24 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-14 7:02 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-14 14:18 ` Christoph Lameter 2008-09-14 19:51 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-15 10:44 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-16 12:28 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-16 14:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-17 4:39 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 10:40 ` Ingo Molnar 2008-09-17 11:41 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar 2008-09-17 13:11 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 13:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-17 13:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-17 17:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-18 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-18 7:25 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-18 7:58 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2008-09-17 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet 2008-09-17 14:50 ` Eric Dumazet 2008-09-17 18:16 ` Mike Galbraith 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11343] SATA Cold Boot Problems with 2.6.27-rc[23] on nVidia 680i Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11358] net: forcedeth call restore mac addr in nv_shutdown path Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 7:37 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-13 17:23 ` Takashi Iwai 2008-09-15 0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 20:50 ` Vegard Nossum 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11463] sshd hangs on close Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11471] GPE storm detected, kernel freezes Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-16 5:50 ` Zhang Rui 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11485] 2.6.27-rc xen pvops regression? Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 22:14 ` James Morris 2008-09-12 22:24 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-13 0:15 ` James Morris 2008-09-13 19:37 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-15 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-15 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-15 13:42 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-17 19:50 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 21:24 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-17 22:11 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 21:48 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 22:12 ` Paul Moore 2008-09-17 22:24 ` Andrew Morton 2008-09-17 22:53 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-17 22:32 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-18 12:38 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-18 13:03 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-18 18:34 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-19 16:58 ` david 2008-09-19 17:07 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-29 16:49 ` Stephen Smalley 2008-09-17 22:23 ` David Miller 2008-09-17 21:56 ` Eric W. Biederman 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-19 16:17 ` Marcin Slusarz 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 20:56 ` Chris Mason 2008-09-12 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11547] build issue #565 for v2.6.27-rc5 : undefined reference to `ei_interrupt' in hp-plus.c Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 22:52 ` Rene Herman 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11553] Strange looking line from "ps aux" Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 8:51 ` Alan Jenkins 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11554] Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 23:37 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski 2008-09-15 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 3:24 ` Justin Mattock 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11557] Controlling backlight on thinkpad x60 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-13 15:13 ` Matthew Garrett 2008-09-14 10:18 ` Pavel Machek 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11559] 2.6.27-rc6: nohz + s2ram = need to press keys to get progress Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11556] e100: PCI wake-up handling rework causes "Error clearing wake event" Rafael J. Wysocki -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2008-11-02 16:47 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-11-02 16:49 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-25 21:04 2.6.28-rc1-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop 2008-10-04 17:28 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-04 17:32 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-07 22:34 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-27 15:54 2.6.27-rc7-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-27 15:56 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-09 10:50 [bisected][resend] " Frans Pop 2008-09-20 23:49 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-20 23:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2008-09-26 21:40 ` [Bug #11550] " Bjorn Helgaas 2008-09-27 15:16 ` Frans Pop 2008-09-27 20:53 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-03-04 20:17 ` Frans Pop 2009-03-04 21:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2009-03-20 2:07 ` Jesse Barnes 2009-03-23 15:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox