Re: [PATCH 3/3] [MTD] physmap.c: Add a dummy release function

[Zev Weiss <zevweiss@gmail.com>]

Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:33:08PM -0700, Zev Weiss wrote:
> 
>> Adding a dummy release function to the physmap device so as to silence a log
>> warning on initialization.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zevweiss@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c |    5 +++++
>>   1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c
>> index 49e2039..73a8d3c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c
>> @@ -277,11 +277,16 @@ static struct resource physmap_flash_resource = {
>>   	.flags		= IORESOURCE_MEM,
>>   };
>>
>> +static void physmap_dummy_release(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>>   static struct platform_device physmap_flash = {
>>   	.name		= "physmap-flash",
>>   	.id		= 0,
>>   	.dev		= {
>>   		.platform_data	= &physmap_flash_data,
>> +		.release	= &physmap_dummy_release,
>>   	},
>>   	.num_resources	= 1,
>>   	.resource	= &physmap_flash_resource,
> 
> Isn't that just papering over the issue?
> 

Quite possibly -- is there something it *should* be doing?  (I don't mean to suggest 
I particularly think there's not, honest question.)  I had figured it was a minor 
oversight and the warning was sort of a "spurious" one, though I'm admittedly well 
out of my depth here, so perhaps I shouldn't be doing such things (though I suppose 
it's one way to learn).