From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753386AbYIMUQR (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:16:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752681AbYIMUQI (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:16:08 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:34873 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752625AbYIMUQH (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:16:07 -0400 Message-ID: <48CC1F7C.7050908@garzik.org> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:15:56 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Jesse Barnes , Alessandro Guido , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pm list Subject: Re: [PATCH] e100: Use pci_pme_active to clear PME_Status and disable PME# References: <200808051730.27599.alessandro.guido@gmail.com> <200808080000.07156.rjw@sisk.pl> <200808080014.25493.rjw@sisk.pl> <200808080018.05887.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200808080018.05887.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > e100: Use pci_pme_active to clear PME_Status and disable PME# > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > --- > drivers/net/e100.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/e100.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e100.c > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/e100.c > @@ -2738,9 +2738,7 @@ static int __devinit e100_probe(struct p > nic->flags |= wol_magic; > > /* ack any pending wake events, disable PME */ > - err = pci_enable_wake(pdev, 0, 0); > - if (err) > - DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "Error clearing wake event\n"); > + pci_pme_active(pdev, false); Since I am rusty on my PCI... why is this needed?