public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@coritel.it>
To: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: added better file aio_read aio_write operations presence check
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:13:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48CF94DE.7020209@coritel.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea11fea30809160403x69df37cbn34135c40026f75e3@mail.gmail.com>

BUG_ON it was a way to say: "hey you've used the do_sync_read/write as
read/write operation but you don't specified an aio_read/write", but
your solutions it's good too.

Manish Katiyar ha scritto:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Marco Stornelli
> <marco.stornelli@coritel.it> wrote:
>> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
>>
>> If a filesystem in the file operations specifies for read and write operations only do_sync_read and do_sync_write without
>> init aio_read and aio_write, there will be a kernel oops, because the vfs code check the presence of (to read for example)
>> read OR aio_read method, then it calls read if it's pointer is not null. It's not sufficient because if the read function is
>> actually a do_sync_read, it calls aio_read but without checking the presence. I think a BUG_ON check can be more useful.
> 
> Instead of doing a BUG_ON() why can't we simply fall back to the
> generic_aio functions since most of the fs tend to do so as below.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
>  fs/read_write.c |   10 ++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index 9ba495d..5439bc4 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -225,7 +225,11 @@ ssize_t do_sync_read(struct file *filp, char
> __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *pp
>  	kiocb.ki_left = len;
> 
>  	for (;;) {
> -		ret = filp->f_op->aio_read(&kiocb, &iov, 1, kiocb.ki_pos);
> +		if (filp->f_op->aio_read)
> +			ret = filp->f_op->aio_read(&kiocb, &iov, 1, kiocb.ki_pos);
> +		else
> +			ret = generic_file_aio_read(&kiocb, &iov, 1, kiocb.ki_pos);
>  		if (ret != -EIOCBRETRY)
>  			break;
>  		wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb(&kiocb);
> @@ -280,7 +284,10 @@ ssize_t do_sync_write(struct file *filp, const
> char __user *buf, size_t len, lof
>  	kiocb.ki_left = len;
> 
>  	for (;;) {
> -		ret = filp->f_op->aio_write(&kiocb, &iov, 1, kiocb.ki_pos);
> +		if (filp->f_op->aio_write)
> +			ret = filp->f_op->aio_write(&kiocb, &iov, 1, kiocb.ki_pos);
> +		else
> +			ret = generic_file_aio_write(&kiocb, &iov, 1, kiocb.ki_pos);
>  		if (ret != -EIOCBRETRY)
>  			break;
>  		wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb(&kiocb);


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-16 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-16  9:29 [PATCH] vfs: added better file aio_read aio_write operations presence check Marco Stornelli
2008-09-16 11:03 ` Manish Katiyar
2008-09-16 11:13   ` Marco Stornelli [this message]
2008-09-16 11:31     ` Manish Katiyar
2008-09-16 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found] <bcF2N-29W-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <bcGBv-4eJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-09-16 15:36   ` Bodo Eggert
2008-09-16 15:41     ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48CF94DE.7020209@coritel.it \
    --to=marco.stornelli@coritel.it \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkatiyar@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox